{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T07:28:00Z","timestamp":1792740480280,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,17]],"date-time":"2021-05-17T12:17:25Z","timestamp":1621253845000},"page":"1013-1021","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Committee Opinion No. 418: The Complete 11\u201314 Week Prenatal Sonographic Examination"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Natasha","family":"Simula","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Richard","family":"Brown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kimberly","family":"Butt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne-Maude","family":"Morency","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suzanne","family":"Demers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ariadna","family":"Grigoriu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ori","family":"Nevo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12342","article-title":"ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan","volume":"41","author":"Salomon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0002","first-page":"E13","article-title":"AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations","volume":"37","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0003","unstructured":"The Fetal Medicine Foundation. Certificates of competency: nuchal translucency scan. Available at: https:\/\/fetalmedicine.org\/fmf-certification\/certificates-of-competence\/nuchal-translucency-scan. Accessed on April 14, 2020."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0004","unstructured":"Fong K, Levi C, Mayer L, et al. CAR standard for performing diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. Available at: https:\/\/car.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ultrasound-Performing-Diagnostic-Obstetric-Ultrasound-Examinations-2010.pdf. Accessed on January 15, 2021."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.11.025","article-title":"WFUMB\/ISUOG statement on the safe use of doppler ultrasound during 11-14 week scans (or earlier in pregnancy)","volume":"39","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0006","unstructured":"American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM official statement: as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle. Available at: https:\/\/www.aium.org\/officialStatements\/39. Accessed on April 17, 2020."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8817","article-title":"Semi-automated adjusted measurement of nuchal translucency: feasibility and reproducibility","volume":"37","author":"Grang\u00e9","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4245","article-title":"Intra-operator and inter-operator reliability of manual and semiautomated measurement of fetal nuchal translucency: a cross sectional study","volume":"33","author":"Bakker","year":"2013","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1497","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.04.010","article-title":"Guideline No. 388-determination of gestational age by ultrasound","volume":"41","author":"Butt","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Canada"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001949","article-title":"Committee Opinion No. 688: Management of suboptimally dated pregnancies","volume":"129","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0011","first-page":"959","article-title":"Methods for estimating the due date. Committee opinion 700","volume":"129","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)11280-6","article-title":"UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation","volume":"352","author":"Snijders","year":"1998","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.992","article-title":"Likelihood ratio for trisomy 21 in fetuses with absent nasal bone at the 11-14-week scan","volume":"23","author":"Cicero","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.716","article-title":"Ductus venosus assessment at the time of nuchal translucency measurement in the detection of fetal aneuploidy","volume":"23","author":"Borrell","year":"2003","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.12060380.x","article-title":"Screening for chromosomal abnormalities at 10-14 weeks: the role of ductus venosus blood flow","volume":"12","author":"Matias","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6264","article-title":"Tricuspid regurgitation in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11\u202f+\u202f0 to 13\u202f+\u202f6 weeks of gestation","volume":"33","author":"Kagan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2013.12.008","article-title":"The nuchal translucency examination leading to early diagnosis of structural fetal anomalies","volume":"90","author":"Goldstein","year":"2014","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17246","article-title":"Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance","volume":"50","author":"Karim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20844","article-title":"Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11\u201313 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"54","author":"Syngelaki","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17487","article-title":"Effectiveness of 12\u201313-week scan for early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the cell-free DNA era","volume":"51","author":"Kenkhuis","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1127","article-title":"Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: a cross-sectional study","volume":"25","author":"Korenromp","year":"2005","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12489","article-title":"Improved detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using an extended examination protocol","volume":"42","author":"Iliescu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1002\/ajum.12109","article-title":"How to perform a sonographic morphological assessment of the fetus at 11-14 weeks of gestation","volume":"21","author":"Springhall","year":"2018","journal-title":"Australas J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.siny.2017.11.005","article-title":"First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies","volume":"23","author":"Edwards","year":"2018","journal-title":"Semin Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.21892","article-title":"Outcome of twin pregnancy with two live fetuses at 11\u201313 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"55","author":"Litwinska","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6396","article-title":"Relationship of intertwin crown-rump length discrepancy to chorionicity, fetal demise and birth-weight discordance","volume":"34","author":"Bhide","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11225","article-title":"First-trimester growth discordance and adverse pregnancy outcome in dichorionic twins","volume":"41","author":"Harper","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8956","article-title":"First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy","volume":"38","author":"Dias","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.04.023","article-title":"First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin gestations using the lambda sign: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"202","author":"Maruotti","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.037","article-title":"First-trimester risk assessment for trisomies 21 and 18 in twin pregnancy","volume":"197","author":"Chasen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2445","article-title":"First trimester aneuploidy screening in the presence of a vanishing twin: implications for maternal serum markers","volume":"30","author":"Spencer","year":"2010","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30588-0","article-title":"Hypertension Guideline Committee. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: executive summary","volume":"36","author":"Magee","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Canada"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5157","article-title":"Uterine artery Doppler at 11\u202f+\u202f0 to 13\u202f+\u202f6 weeks inthe prediction of pre-eclampsia","volume":"30","author":"Plasencia","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1704559","article-title":"Aspirin versus Placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia","volume":"377","author":"Rolnik","year":"2017","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0960-7692.2001.00594.x","article-title":"Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11\u201314 weeks of gestation","volume":"18","author":"Martin","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13275","article-title":"First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55 974 women","volume":"43","author":"Velauthar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7439","article-title":"Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by uterine artery Doppler imaging and blood pressure at 11-13 weeks","volume":"34","author":"Poon","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1159\/000341264","article-title":"Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers","volume":"33","author":"Akolekar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1159\/000341712","article-title":"Combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age at 11-13 weeks","volume":"33","author":"Poon","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19045","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound in detecting abnormally invasive placenta in high-risk women with placenta previa","volume":"52","author":"Cali","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20104","article-title":"Screening for morbidly adherent placenta in early pregnancy","volume":"53","author":"Panaiotova","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.12.004","article-title":"No. 383-screening, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders","volume":"41","author":"Hobson","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Canada"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.32","article-title":"Cervical length at 11-14 weeks \u2019 and 22-24 weeks\u2019 gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery","volume":"21","author":"Carvalho","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2909","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1111334","article-title":"Reference ranges for the uterine arteries Doppler and cervical length measurement at 11\u201313(+6) weeks of gestation in a Brazilian population","volume":"29","author":"Peixoto","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17556","article-title":"Transvaginal sonographic cervical length in first and second trimesters in a low-risk population: a prospective study","volume":"51","author":"Wulff","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0046","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.501124","article-title":"The role of cervical length measurement at 11-14 weeks for the prediction of preterm delivery","volume":"24","author":"Antsaklis","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Matern Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0047","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2640","article-title":"Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from endocervical length at 11 to 13 weeks","volume":"31","author":"Greco","year":"2011","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3181bea9d7","article-title":"Adnexal masses in pregnancy","volume":"52","author":"Schwartz","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.07.013","article-title":"The value of ultrasound visualization of the ovaries during the routine 11-14 weeks nuchal translucency scan","volume":"132","author":"Yazbek","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004_bib0050","article-title":"Investigation and management of adnexal masses in pregnancy","volume":"2016","author":"Cavaco-Gomes","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scientifica (Cairo)"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216321003753?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216321003753?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:39:27Z","timestamp":1761665967000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216321003753"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216321003753"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1701-2163","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Committee Opinion No. 418: The Complete 11\u201314 Week Prenatal Sonographic Examination","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2021.05.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}