{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:49:24Z","timestamp":1761666564949,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]],"date-time":"2022-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,13]],"date-time":"2022-09-13T05:05:43Z","timestamp":1663045543000},"page":"1159-1166","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Elective Induction of Labour at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Persons Delivering in a Community Hospital"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"44","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6869-4078","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adelaide","family":"Burrows","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kristin","family":"Finkenzeller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessica","family":"Pudwell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Graeme","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30842-2","article-title":"Induction of labour","volume":"35","author":"Leduc","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"F1000","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.17587.1","article-title":"Recent advances in the induction of labor","volume":"8","author":"Marconi","year":"2019","journal-title":"F1000Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"New Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.09.020","article-title":"No. 375-Clinical practice guideline on the use of first trimester ultrasound","volume":"41","author":"Van den Hof","year":"2019","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820caf12","article-title":"Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"117","author":"Osmundson","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.03.016","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies","volume":"211","author":"Gibson","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e2838","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e2838","article-title":"Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population-based study","volume":"344","author":"Stock","year":"2012","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.09.019","article-title":"Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes","volume":"207","author":"Cheng","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0","article-title":"Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes","volume":"122","author":"Darney","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib13","first-page":"1","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor","volume":"176","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00007","article-title":"Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy","volume":"151","author":"Caughey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.048","article-title":"Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery","volume":"217","author":"Kawakita","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.09.095","article-title":"A\u00a0risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies","volume":"214","author":"Gibson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.223","article-title":"Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term","volume":"220","author":"Souter","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117","article-title":"Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older","volume":"374","author":"Walker","year":"2016","journal-title":"New Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"I344","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l344","article-title":"Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"364","author":"Keulen","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib20","first-page":"25","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor","volume":"56","author":"Vardo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34372-9","article-title":"Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"31","author":"Dunne","year":"2009","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.08.061226","article-title":"Elective induction versus spontaneous labour in Latin America","volume":"89","author":"Guerra","year":"2011","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1159\/000073771","article-title":"Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort study","volume":"56","author":"van Gemund","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib26","first-page":"600","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women","volume":"94","author":"Seyb","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70265-6","article-title":"Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions","volume":"180","author":"Yeast","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.458","article-title":"Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"188","author":"Johnson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70153-4","article-title":"Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil","volume":"177","author":"Chyu","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216322006144?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216322006144?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:40:32Z","timestamp":1761666032000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216322006144"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216322006144"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1701-2163"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Elective Induction of Labour at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Persons Delivering in a Community Hospital","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.09.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}