{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T11:33:19Z","timestamp":1784633599176,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,1]],"date-time":"2023-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682899200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,25]],"date-time":"2023-05-25T15:15:05Z","timestamp":1685027705000},"page":"338-341.e1","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Technical Update No. 436: Classification of Cesarean Deliveries in Canada: The Modified Robson Criteria"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Karen T.","family":"Wong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kirsten M.","family":"Niles","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib1","author":"Canadian Institute of Health Information"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","article-title":"The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014","volume":"11","author":"Betran","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib3","first-page":"436","article-title":"Appropriate technology for birth","volume":"2","author":"Moore","year":"1985","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.15553","article-title":"Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality","volume":"314","author":"Molina","year":"2015","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13592","article-title":"Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data","volume":"123","author":"Ye","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"o446","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.o446","article-title":"Hospitals in England are told to stop using caesarean rates to assess performance","volume":"376","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0014566","article-title":"Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Torloni","year":"2011","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.10.017","article-title":"No. 281-classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the modified Robson criteria","volume":"39","author":"Farine","year":"2017","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rhm.2015.07.007","article-title":"WHO statement on caesarean section rates","volume":"23","author":"World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme A","year":"2015","journal-title":"Reprod Health Matters"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0097769","article-title":"A\u00a0systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it","volume":"9","author":"Betran","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539501000122","article-title":"Classification of caesarean sections","volume":"12","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.09.009","article-title":"Examining cesarean section rates in Canada using the modified Robson classification","volume":"42","author":"Gu","year":"2020","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30992-0","article-title":"Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system","volume":"35","author":"Kelly","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14774","article-title":"Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review","volume":"125","author":"Boatin","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0251141","article-title":"Variation between hospital caesarean delivery rates when Robson's classification is considered: an observational study from a French perinatal network","volume":"16","author":"Quibel","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLoS One"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216323001548?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216323001548?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T15:43:17Z","timestamp":1761666197000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216323001548"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216323001548"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1701-2163","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Technical Update No. 436: Classification of Cesarean Deliveries in Canada: The Modified Robson Criteria","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.03.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}