{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,18]],"date-time":"2026-04-18T06:34:55Z","timestamp":1776494095781,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775001600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775001600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,19]],"date-time":"2025-09-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1758240000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jogc.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]],"date-time":"2025-09-23T04:28:31Z","timestamp":1758601711000},"page":"103128","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The Proportion of Birth Asphyxia Associated With Maternal Heart Rate Artifact During Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Labour"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"48","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1928-2880","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lawrence","family":"Oppenheimer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mariah","family":"Colussi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Laura","family":"Payant","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Liisa","family":"Honey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Kiely","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jun","family":"Ji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Qian","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"MacIntyre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Reem","family":"El Sherif","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Karen","family":"Young","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sue","family":"Woods","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gary","family":"Garber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2019.05.007","article-title":"No. 396-fetal health surveillance: intrapartum consensus guideline","volume":"42","author":"Dore","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003674","article-title":"Fetal heart rate Monitoring: still a mystery more than half a century later","volume":"135","author":"Andrews","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib3","article-title":"Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour","volume":"2","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"962","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30408-4","article-title":"The incidence of maternal artefact during intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring","volume":"36","author":"Paquette","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2660-5","article-title":"Unrecognized maternal heart rate artefact in cases of perinatal mortality reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration from 2009 to 2019: a critical patient safety issue","volume":"19","author":"Kiely","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib6","first-page":"373","article-title":"Role of maternal artifact in fetal heart rate pattern interpretation","volume":"44","author":"Klapholz","year":"1974","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1177\/0884217503261161","article-title":"Maternal or fetal heart rate? Avoiding intrapartum misidentification","volume":"33","author":"Murray","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.030","article-title":"Signal ambiguity resulting in unexpected outcome with external fetal heart rate monitoring","volume":"198","author":"Neilson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1002\/jhrm.21348","article-title":"Using medicolegal data to support safe medical care: a contributing factor coding framework","volume":"38","author":"McCleery","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Healthc Risk Manag"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.12.037","article-title":"Contributory factors and potentially avoidable neonatal encephalopathy associated with perinatal asphyxia","volume":"214","author":"Sadler","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1564","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2018.12.015","article-title":"Prediction of hypoxic acidemia in last 2 hours of labour in low-risk women","volume":"41","author":"Toomey","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"762","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1688998","article-title":"Acidemia can occur despite Category I tracing","volume":"37","author":"Bruno","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.026","article-title":"A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia","volume":"218","author":"Cahill","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2022.06.002","article-title":"Technical update no. 429: maternal heart rate artefact during intrapartum fetal health surveillance","volume":"44","author":"Kiely","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000032829","article-title":"Use of Delphi in health sciences research: a narrative review","volume":"102","author":"Shang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib16","first-page":"896","article-title":"neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy","volume":"123","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1411476","article-title":"Incidence of maternal tachycardia during the second stage of labor: a prospective observational cohort study","volume":"32","author":"Towers","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000664628.42748.8c","article-title":"Maternal heart rate in labor and the potential for confusion with fetal heart rate [20L]","volume":"135","author":"Oppenheimer","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib19","unstructured":"M. Magro, Five years of cerebral palsy claims; A thematic review of NHS resolution data, 2017. Available at: https:\/\/resolution.nhs.uk\/resources\/five-years-of-cerebral-palsy-claims\/. Accessed November 10, 2023"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","article-title":"FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography","volume":"131","author":"Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181aef106","article-title":"ACOG practice bulletin no. 106: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2024.01.011","article-title":"Intrapartum cardiotocography with simultaneous maternal heart rate registration improves neonatal outcome","volume":"230","author":"Tarvonen","year":"2024","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1428","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01511.x","article-title":"Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph","volume":"91","author":"Nurani","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib24","unstructured":"Fetal monitoring in labour, 2022, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London. Available at: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng229. Accessed February 2, 2025."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2019.21363","article-title":"Clinician identification of birth asphyxia using intrapartum cardiotocography among neonates with and without encephalopathy in New Zealand","volume":"3","author":"Farquhar","year":"2020","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14591","article-title":"Reliability and agreement in intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation: a systematic review","volume":"102","author":"Hernandez Engelhart","year":"2023","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.06.053","article-title":"Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy","volume":"197","author":"Larma","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.10.009","article-title":"The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia","volume":"216","author":"Clark","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216325003743?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1701216325003743?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T07:21:41Z","timestamp":1774941701000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1701216325003743"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S1701216325003743"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128","relation":{},"ISSN":["1701-2163"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1701-2163","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The Proportion of Birth Asphyxia Associated With Maternal Heart Rate Artifact During Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Labour","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogc.2025.103128","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada\/La Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des obst\u00e9triciens et gyn\u00e9cologues du Canada.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"103128"}}