{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T19:01:22Z","timestamp":1789671682083,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,1]],"date-time":"2017-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1512086400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,22]],"date-time":"2017-09-22T19:00:30Z","timestamp":1506106830000},"page":"737-742","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a matched controlled study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"J.","family":"Boujenah","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Fleury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Bonneau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"I.","family":"Pharisien","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Tigaizin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Carbillon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","article-title":"The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study","volume":"166","author":"Hickok","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13524","article-title":"The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies","volume":"123","author":"Berhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13535","article-title":"The term breech trial results are generalisable","volume":"123","author":"Thornton","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"21","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade","article-title":"External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis","volume":"112","author":"Grootscholten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0185","first-page":"CD000083","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation at term","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000295","article-title":"Mode of delivery after successful external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"123","author":"De Hundt","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.056","article-title":"Caesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study","volume":"190","author":"V\u00e9zina","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08150.x","article-title":"A comparison of fetal behaviour in breech and cephalic presentations at term","volume":"106","author":"Kean","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2005","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1072160","article-title":"Risk factors for caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery after successful external cephalic version","volume":"29","author":"De Hundt","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000129240.54949.d2","article-title":"Intrapartum caesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version: a meta-analysis","volume":"104","author":"Chan","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12162","article-title":"The Impact of an ECV service is limited by antenatal breech detection: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"42","author":"Hemelaar","year":"2015","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2008.00889.x","article-title":"Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland","volume":"48","author":"Wise","year":"2008","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-35609","article-title":"Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version","volume":"19","author":"Ben-Haroush","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.3109\/01443610903383341","article-title":"Labor outcome of women with successful external cephalic version: a prospective study","volume":"30","author":"Jain","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)80040-3","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term","volume":"176","author":"Lau","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2008.227","article-title":"Caesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis","volume":"29","author":"Clock","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3643-z","article-title":"Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of caesarean delivery","volume":"292","author":"Hants","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.07.019","article-title":"Obstetric outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term","volume":"127","author":"Theron","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2015.220","article-title":"Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version","volume":"36","author":"Basu","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0260","first-page":"771","article-title":"Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version","volume":"83","author":"Egge","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.900749","article-title":"Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery","volume":"28","author":"Salzer","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30809-4","article-title":"Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery","volume":"35","author":"Kuppens","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12219","article-title":"Independent uterine contractions in simultaneous twin pregnancy in each horn of the uterus didelphys","volume":"40","author":"Maki","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90071-P","article-title":"Predicting success of external cephalic version","volume":"169","author":"Newman","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0285","first-page":"201","article-title":"Predicting the success of external cephalic version with a scoring system. A prospective, two-phase study","volume":"45","author":"Wong","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0290","first-page":"122","article-title":"Labor and delivery in nulliparous women who present with an unengaged fetal head","volume":"18","author":"Murphy","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822545a9","article-title":"Timing of delivery after external cephalic version and the risk for caesarean delivery","volume":"118","author":"Kabiri","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.2700","article-title":"Prediction of intrapartum caesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery","volume":"27","author":"Leung","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1096-8628(19971219)73:3<276::AID-AJMG9>3.0.CO;2-Q","article-title":"Increase in fetal breech presentation in female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy","volume":"19","author":"Geifman-Holtzman","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2016.03.007","article-title":"Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation","volume":"45","author":"Coppola","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"}],"container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784717301721?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784717301721?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,6]],"date-time":"2021-11-06T18:10:50Z","timestamp":1636222250000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468784717301721"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468784717301721"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7847"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7847","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a matched controlled study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}