{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T03:58:35Z","timestamp":1790049515197,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]],"date-time":"2020-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1585699200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]],"date-time":"2020-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1585699200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,20]],"date-time":"2021-03-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616198400000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":353,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,21]],"date-time":"2020-01-21T11:59:39Z","timestamp":1579607979000},"page":"101693","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes after successful external cephalic version relative to those after spontaneous cephalic presentations"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"49","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3933-9506","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J.","family":"Chevreau","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Foulon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Beuvin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Gondry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Sergent","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","article-title":"The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study","volume":"166","author":"Hickok","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2017-0127","article-title":"Neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 4 years according to the planned mode of delivery in term breech presentation: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study","volume":"46","author":"Macharey","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2018.03.001","article-title":"Management of breech and twin labor during registrarship: a two-year prospective, observational study","volume":"47","author":"Chevreau","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12119","article-title":"Maternal experiences of vaginal breech delivery","volume":"41","author":"Toivonen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade","article-title":"External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis","volume":"112","author":"Grootscholten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0030","article-title":"External cephalic version for breech presentation at term","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.07.002","article-title":"Predictors of success of external cephalic version: Bi-center study","volume":"45","author":"Dochez","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e54","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001312","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 161: external cephalic version","volume":"127","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists\u2019 Committee on Practice Bulletins\u2013Obstetrics","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1159\/000480013","article-title":"Comparison of fetomaternal outcome between 47 deliveries following successful external cephalic version for breech presentation and 7456 deliveries following spontaneous cephalic presentation","volume":"8","author":"de Gregorio","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2017.10.033","article-title":"Induction du travail apr\u00e8s une version par man\u0153uvres externes pour si\u00e8ge r\u00e9ussie : un sur-risque de c\u00e9sarienne?","volume":"40","author":"Boujenah","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0055","first-page":"1","article-title":"Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery","volume":"7","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13524","article-title":"The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies","volume":"123","author":"Berhan","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0070","first-page":"195","article-title":"CNGOF \u2013 mises \u00e0 jour en gyn\u00e9cologie et obst\u00e9trique et techniques chirurgicales","author":"D\u2019Ercole","year":"2011","journal-title":"Paris: Diffusion Vigot-Paris"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d","article-title":"Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"123","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0080","first-page":"632","article-title":"Comparison of obstetric prognosis of attempts of breech delivery: spontaneous labor versus induced labor","volume":"46","author":"Breton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.04.008","article-title":"Common determinants of breech presentation at birth in singletons: a population-based study","volume":"177","author":"Cammu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.04.022","article-title":"Uterine anomalies and pregnancy outcome following resectoscope metroplasty","volume":"98","author":"Zlopa\u0161a","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f7496d","article-title":"Leiomyomas at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination and adverse obstetric outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Stout","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2006.09.007","article-title":"How to reduce the incidence and complications of occiput posterior positions during delivery?","volume":"34","author":"Boog","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0105","first-page":"915","article-title":"Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes","volume":"101","author":"Ponkey","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2009.00380.x","article-title":"The fetal occiput posterior position: state of the science and a new perspective","volume":"37","author":"Simkin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0115","first-page":"41","article-title":"Maternal and fetal prognosis of occipito-posterior presentation","volume":"28","author":"Riethmuller","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500345428","article-title":"Obstetrical factors related to nuchal cord","volume":"85","author":"Ogueh","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"}],"container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784720300209?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784720300209?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:55:45Z","timestamp":1762854945000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468784720300209"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468784720300209"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7847"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7847","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes after successful external cephalic version relative to those after spontaneous cephalic presentations","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101693","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101693"}}