{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T23:48:15Z","timestamp":1790120895920,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630454400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,17]],"date-time":"2021-12-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1639699200000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":107,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,17]],"date-time":"2020-11-17T12:57:06Z","timestamp":1605617826000},"page":"101996","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Induction of labour with unfavourable local conditions for suspected fetal growth restriction after 36 weeks of gestation: Factors associated with the risk of caesarean"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"50","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7407-0683","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anne","family":"Pinton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Camille","family":"Lemaire Tomzack","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hilde","family":"Merckelbagh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fran\u00e7ois","family":"Goffinet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00602.x","article-title":"Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death","volume":"83","author":"Froen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.09.023","article-title":"Retard de croissance intra-ut\u00e9rin\u2009: recommandations pour la pratique clinique","volume":"42","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1392-7","article-title":"Evidence of lower oxygen reserves during labour in the growth restricted human foetus: a retrospective study","volume":"17","author":"Parisi","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0025","first-page":"287","article-title":"Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates","volume":"102","author":"Heffner","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2014A prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10028","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","article-title":"Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial","volume":"387","author":"Ten Eikelder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c7087","article-title":"Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)","volume":"341","author":"Boers","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2014.11.018","article-title":"Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction","volume":"129","author":"Chavakula","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.12.038","article-title":"A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress","volume":"191","author":"Rozenberg","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1159\/000491784","article-title":"Labor induction in late-onset fetal growth restriction: Foley balloon versus vaginal dinoprostone","volume":"46","author":"Villalain","year":"2019","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"18","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2131","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2014.980807","article-title":"Fetal growth restriction: risk factors for unplanned primary cesarean delivery","volume":"28","author":"Horowitz","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0065","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook\u2019s balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term","author":"Duro-G\u00f3mez","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2014A prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.08.009","article-title":"Courbes de croissance in utero ajust\u00e9es et non ajust\u00e9es adapt\u00e9es \u00e0 la population fran\u00e7aise. I \u2013 M\u00e9thodes de construction","volume":"45","author":"Ego","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Biol Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sagf.2016.11.006","article-title":"Recommandations pour l\u2019administration d\u2019oxytocine au cours du travail spontan\u00e9. Texte court des recommandations","volume":"16","author":"Dupont","year":"2017","journal-title":"Rev Sage-Femme"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0085","series-title":"Protocoles cliniques de Port Royal en obst\u00e9trique","author":"Goffinet","year":"2017"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994679","article-title":"Uteroplacental doppler flow velocity waveform indices in normal pregnancy: a statistical exercise and the development of appropriate reference values","volume":"9","author":"Kofinas","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/0301-5629(87)90166-9","article-title":"Exploration of the fetal cerebral blood flow by duplex doppler\u2014Linear array system in normal and pathological pregnancies","volume":"13","author":"Arbeille","year":"1987","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0100","unstructured":"AUDIPOG (Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatis\u00e9s en P\u00e9diatrie, Obst\u00e9trique et Gyn\u00e9cologie) n.d. http:\/\/www.audipog.net\/index.php."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/293516","article-title":"Labour and neonatal outcome in small for gestational age babies delivered beyond 36+0 weeks: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"2011","author":"Boers","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pregnancy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0110","first-page":"1","article-title":"Prostaglandins and cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in patients delivering small-for-gestational age neonates at term","author":"Rosenbloom","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2016.1174824","article-title":"Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy - is the caesarean section rate really lower?","volume":"36","author":"Mahomed","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"l344","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l344","article-title":"Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"364","author":"Keulen","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1716","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2012.663018","article-title":"Induction at 41 weeks increases the risk of caesarean section in a hospital with a low rate of caesarean sections","volume":"25","author":"Burgos","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"17","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2874","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1450861","article-title":"Postdates induction with an unfavorable cervix and risk of cesarean","volume":"32","author":"McCoy","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34241-4","article-title":"Does routine induction of labour at 41 weeks really reduce the rate of caesarean section compared with expectant management?","volume":"31","author":"Pavicic","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001083","article-title":"Predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor among nulliparous women at term","volume":"126","author":"Tolcher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2001.00415.x","article-title":"A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics: evidence for Doppler velocimetry in pregnancy","volume":"17","author":"Westergaard","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784720303664?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784720303664?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T09:57:30Z","timestamp":1762855050000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468784720303664"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468784720303664"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7847"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7847","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Induction of labour with unfavourable local conditions for suspected fetal growth restriction after 36 weeks of gestation: Factors associated with the risk of caesarean","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101996","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101996"}}