{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,22]],"date-time":"2026-09-22T14:56:43Z","timestamp":1790089003823,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,14]],"date-time":"2023-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684022400000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":347,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,1]],"date-time":"2022-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1654041600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,6]],"date-time":"2022-05-06T05:25:44Z","timestamp":1651814744000},"page":"102404","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Cervical maturation in breech presentation: Mechanical versus prostaglandin methods"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"51","author":[{"given":"M.","family":"Khobzaoui","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Ghesquiere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Drumez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V.","family":"Debarge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Subtil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Garabedian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599\u2011604","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.03.033","article-title":"Breech presentation: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)","volume":"252","author":"Sentilhes","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned KL caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864\u201171","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002\u201111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.10.817","article-title":"Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium","volume":"194","author":"Goffinet","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0005","first-page":"e60\u20113","article-title":"ACOG committee opinion no. 745: mode of term singleton breech delivery","volume":"132","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"The management of breech pregnancies in Australia and New Zealand Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43: 294\u2013297.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.0004-8666.2003.00078.x"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0007","first-page":"e151\u201177","article-title":"Management of breech presentation: green-top guideline no. 20b","volume":"124","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29\u201134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2015.12.001","article-title":"Effectiveness and safety of induction of labor for term breech presentations","volume":"46","author":"Bleu","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"597\u2011600","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.04.005","article-title":"Induced labour at term and breech presentation: experience of a level IIB French maternity","volume":"46","author":"Jarniat","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0010","first-page":"668\u201174","article-title":"Induction du travail et pr\u00e9sentation du si\u00e8ge\u00a0: exp\u00e9rience de la maternit\u00e9 de l'h\u00f4pital Robert-Debr\u00e9, Paris","volume":"40","author":"Marzouk","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Gyn\u00e9cologie Obst\u00e9trique Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891\u20119","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14256","article-title":"Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","volume":"124","author":"Du","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194\u20118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.05.003","article-title":"Evaluation of a decision protocol for type of delivery of infants in breech presentation at term","volume":"158","author":"Michel","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1336\u201144","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14083","article-title":"Induction of labor in breech presentations - a retrospective cohort study","volume":"100","author":"Welle-Strand","year":"2021","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137\u201145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017","article-title":"Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature","volume":"170","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.11.603","article-title":"A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"218","author":"Levine","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21\u20115","DOI":"10.3126\/kumj.v7i1.1760","article-title":"Indications for labour induction and predictors for failed induction at KMCTH","volume":"7","author":"Rayamajhi","year":"1970","journal-title":"Kathmandu Univ Med J."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483\u20117","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2015.07.013","article-title":"Failed induction of labor","volume":"39","author":"Schoen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"486.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.03.014","article-title":"Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort","volume":"206","author":"Laughon","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57\u201162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.11.006","article-title":"Labour induction practices in France: a population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units","volume":"47","author":"Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod."}],"container-title":["Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784722000873?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2468784722000873?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T10:01:26Z","timestamp":1762855286000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2468784722000873"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S2468784722000873"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-7847"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-7847","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Cervical maturation in breech presentation: Mechanical versus prostaglandin methods","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2022.102404","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"102404"}}