{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T14:13:23Z","timestamp":1789136003176,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Scientific Scholar","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,1]],"date-time":"2025-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1746057600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,1]],"date-time":"2025-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1746057600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100016646","name":"HCA Healthcare Inc","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100016646","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]],"date-time":"2024-10-23T11:56:29Z","timestamp":1729684589000},"page":"43-47","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Plate, short nail, or long nail? Revision rates and complications of three different treatments for peritrochanteric femur fractures"],"prefix":"10.25259","volume":"63","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-0774-9280","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mason","family":"Poffenbarger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Neil","family":"Werthmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kisan","family":"Parikh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Riehl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10894","reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a008800","article-title":"Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly","volume":"143","author":"Karagas","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib2","first-page":"1","article-title":"Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970-2009","volume":"3","author":"Marks","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Graph Multimed"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0134.R1","article-title":"Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip","volume":"99-B","author":"Socci","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bone Joint Lett J"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1871","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.00041","article-title":"Extramedullary compared with intramedullary implants for intertrochanteric hip fractures: thirty-day outcomes of 4432 procedures from the ACS NSQIP database","volume":"96","author":"Bohl","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3647","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4469-5","article-title":"Which fixation device is preferred for surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the United States? A survey of orthopaedic surgeons","volume":"473","author":"Niu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib6","series-title":"American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults EvidenceBased Clinical Practice Guideline","year":"2021"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001553","article-title":"Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for pertrochanteric hip fractures: a randomized prospective study","volume":"33","author":"Shannon","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.7812\/TPP\/19.229","article-title":"Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures with long versus short cephalomedullary nails","volume":"24","author":"Sadeghi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Perm J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-018-2905-1","article-title":"Singapore orthopaedic research collaborative (SORCE). Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures:Classification, management and outcomes","volume":"138","author":"Chan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/s10195-016-0405-z","article-title":"Long versus short cephalomedullary nail for trochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Dunn","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e31826fc11f","article-title":"Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2) long versus short cephalomedullary nailing","volume":"27","author":"Hou","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-014-1557-2","article-title":"Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up","volume":"25","author":"Vaughn","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000036","article-title":"Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years","volume":"28","author":"Kleweno","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2020.09.037","article-title":"Biomechanical analysis of peri-implant fractures in short versus long cephalomedullary implants following pertrochanteric fracture consolidation","volume":"52","author":"Breceda","year":"2021","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20220511-03","article-title":"Risk of peri-implant fracture with long versus short cephalomedullary nailing for geriatric patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture","volume":"45","author":"Sop","year":"2022","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3715","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04193-4","article-title":"Peri-implant fracture: a rare complication after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fracture","volume":"142","author":"Halonen","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"845","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-16-00818","article-title":"Comparison of short-term complication rates between cephalomedullary hip screw devices and sliding hip screws: an analysis of the National surgical quality improvement Program database","volume":"26","author":"Pandarinath","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-016-1333-z","article-title":"Comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary fixation of stable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: a prospective randomised controlled trial exploring hidden perioperative blood loss","volume":"17","author":"Cai","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Muscoskel Disord"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e96","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e3182a7131c","article-title":"Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2)","volume":"28","author":"Boone","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib20","first-page":"e21","article-title":"Comparison of short, intermediate, and long cephalomedullary nail length outcomes in elderly intertrochanteric femur fractures","volume":"6","author":"Womble","year":"2022","journal-title":"JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e779","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-21-00657","article-title":"Comparison of extramedullary and intramedullary implants for stable intertrochanteric fractures: have we swung the pendulum too far the other way?","volume":"30","author":"Darbandi","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0972978X24003507?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0972978X24003507?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T14:04:28Z","timestamp":1789135468000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jortho.org\/plate-short-nail-or-long-nail-revision-rates-and-complications-of-three-different-treatments-for-peritrochanteric-femur-fractures\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["S0972978X24003507"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-978X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-978X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Plate, short nail, or long nail? Revision rates and complications of three different treatments for peritrochanteric femur fractures","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Orthopaedics","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jor.2024.10.022","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2024 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}