{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T15:06:54Z","timestamp":1789139214748,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Scientific Scholar","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,1]],"date-time":"2026-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,27]],"date-time":"2025-11-27T16:09:47Z","timestamp":1764259787000},"page":"332-339","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"C","title":["A meta-analysis of the outcomes of semi-constrained, unconstrained, and constrained cervical artificial disc designs"],"prefix":"10.25259","volume":"72","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-7681-5778","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thomas","family":"Cho","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nipun U.","family":"Jayatissa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Yatsonsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hossein","family":"Elgafy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5895-8276","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jiayong","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10894","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1007\/s12178-017-9398-3","article-title":"Cervical disc replacement surgery: indications, technique, and technical pearls","volume":"10","author":"Leven","year":"2017","journal-title":"Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2024.11.008","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty is safe across various obesity levels","volume":"25","author":"Singh","year":"2025","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1858","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2024.05.016","article-title":"Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"24","author":"Zavras","year":"2024","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib4","article-title":"Cervical and lumbar disc arthroplasty: a review of current implant design and outcomes","volume":"9","author":"Wellington","year":"2022","journal-title":"Bioengineering (Basel)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semss.2006.03.013","article-title":"Kinematics of cervical and lumbar total disc replacement","volume":"18","author":"Sears","year":"2006","journal-title":"Semin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"s2","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S14","DOI":"10.14444\/7087","article-title":"Biomechanics of cervical disc Arthroplasty-A review of concepts and current technology","volume":"14","author":"Patwardhan","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","article-title":"The cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"343","author":"Higgins","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib9","series-title":"Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine","article-title":"The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta- analyses","author":"Wells","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib10","series-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.5","article-title":"Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses","author":"Deeks","year":"2024"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E469","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000866","article-title":"Incidence of fusion across total disc replacement with heterotopic ossification: are ball and socket disk replacements fusing with and without radiographic evidence","volume":"32","author":"Chin","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.5.SPINE09852","article-title":"Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article","volume":"13","author":"Coric","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04813-5","article-title":"Pretic-I was a safe and effective artificial cervical disc prosthesis--a retrospective and comparative study with 5-year follow-up","volume":"22","author":"Guo","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMC Muscoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"26","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2223","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000060","article-title":"Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site","volume":"38","author":"Hacker","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.09.27","article-title":"Comparison of M6-C and Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement for cervical degenerative disc disease in adults","volume":"5","author":"Hui","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.8.SPINE11273","article-title":"Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and prestige LP disc","volume":"15","author":"Kowalczyk","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-024-05316-4","article-title":"Kinematic status of bryan and Mobi-C artificial cervical discs post cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study","volume":"19","author":"Ma","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.08.078","article-title":"Heterotopic ossification in cervical disk surgery is still a problem. What are the key factors for a solution?","volume":"96","author":"Noriega","year":"2016","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E291","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318288a923","article-title":"X-Ray-based kinematic analysis of cervical spine according to prosthesis designs: analysis of the mobi C, bryan, PCM, and prestige LP","volume":"28","author":"Park","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.SPINE09445","article-title":"Radiological changes of the operated and adjacent segments following cervical arthroplasty after a minimum 24-month follow-up: comparison between the bryan and Prodisc-C devices","volume":"13","author":"Ryu","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"852","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyab298","article-title":"Risk factors for high-grade heterotopic ossification after total disc replacement: a single-center experience of 394 cases","volume":"89","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318201855f","article-title":"Sagittal alignment comparison of bryan disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"24","author":"Yanbin","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"19","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1329","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003537","article-title":"Comparing heterotopic ossification in two cervical disc prostheses","volume":"45","author":"Yang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1556","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c6526b","article-title":"Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement","volume":"35","author":"Yi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-014-2149-7","article-title":"Comparison of bryan versus ProDisc-C total disk replacement as treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disk disease","volume":"135","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.032","article-title":"Artificial discs in cervical disc replacement: a meta-analysis for comparison of long-term outcomes","volume":"134","author":"Wahood","year":"2020","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2631","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06113-y","article-title":"Unique biomechanical signatures of bryan, prodisc C, and prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study","volume":"29","author":"Choi","year":"2020","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.09.075","article-title":"Comparison of heterotopic ossification after Fixed- and mobile-core cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"120","author":"Zeng","year":"2018","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1093\/milmed\/usy395","article-title":"A comparative in vivo study of semi-constrained and unconstrained cervical artificial disc prostheses","volume":"184","author":"Choi","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mil Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2020.0117","article-title":"A comparison study of four cervical disk arthroplasty devices using finite element models","volume":"15","author":"Purushothaman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nec.2021.05.008","article-title":"Biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty devices","volume":"32","author":"Patwardhan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Neurosurg Clin"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E469","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000818","article-title":"Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics?","volume":"40","author":"Mo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.esas.2010.09.001","article-title":"Results at 24 months from the prospective, randomized, multicenter investigational device exemption trial of ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with 4-year follow-up and continued access patients","volume":"4","author":"Delamarter","year":"2010","journal-title":"SAS J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-008-0571-6","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up","volume":"33","author":"Yang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0692-1","article-title":"Cervical arthroplasty for traumatic disc herniation: an Age- and sex-matched comparison with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"16","author":"Chang","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Muscoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.14444\/6030","article-title":"Quality of life following prestige LP cervical disc arthroplasty in a prospective multicountry study","volume":"13","author":"Stulik","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0972978X25004581?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0972978X25004581?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T14:09:14Z","timestamp":1789135754000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jortho.org\/a-meta-analysis-of-the-outcomes-of-semi-constrained-unconstrained-and-constrained-cervical-artificial-disc-designs\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"references-count":36,"alternative-id":["S0972978X25004581"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030","relation":{},"ISSN":["0972-978X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0972-978X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A meta-analysis of the outcomes of semi-constrained, unconstrained, and constrained cervical artificial disc designs","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Orthopaedics","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jor.2025.11.030","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}