{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,13]],"date-time":"2025-05-13T19:51:28Z","timestamp":1747165888344,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":4,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","jpeds.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Pediatrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.07.033","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,11]],"date-time":"2016-08-11T05:19:31Z","timestamp":1470892771000},"page":"309","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Chicken or egg? Dangers in the interpretation of retrospective studies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"178","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9111-5027","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Calum T.","family":"Roberts","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Louise S.","family":"Owen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peter G.","family":"Davis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bradley A.","family":"Yoder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brett J.","family":"Manley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.07.033_bib0010","article-title":"High-flow support in very preterm infants in Australia and New Zealand","author":"Roberts","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.07.033_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.02.051","article-title":"High flow nasal cannula use is associated with increased morbidity and length of hospitalization in extremely low birth weight infants","volume":"173","author":"Taha","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.07.033_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006405.pub3","article-title":"High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.07.033_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1425","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1300071","article-title":"High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation","volume":"369","author":"Manley","year":"2013","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Pediatrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022347616305704?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022347616305704?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,9]],"date-time":"2018-09-09T04:58:42Z","timestamp":1536469122000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0022347616305704"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":4,"alternative-id":["S0022347616305704"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.07.033","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3476"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-3476"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Chicken or egg? Dangers in the interpretation of retrospective studies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Journal of Pediatrics","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.07.033","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpeds.2016.02.051","name":"associatedlink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to the associated document"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}