{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,4]],"date-time":"2026-06-04T19:45:01Z","timestamp":1780602301734,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,1]],"date-time":"2018-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1541030400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","jpedsurg.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Pediatric Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,7]],"date-time":"2018-06-07T07:02:54Z","timestamp":1528354974000},"page":"2250-2255","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"Abdrabuh M","family":"Abdrabuh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elsayed M","family":"Salih","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mahmoud","family":"Aboelnasr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hussein","family":"Galal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abdelbasset","family":"El-Emam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tarek","family":"El-Zayat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)64446-X","article-title":"The operative management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction","volume":"158","author":"Rohrmann","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(17)55166-6","article-title":"Management of initial pyeloplasty failure","volume":"125","author":"Persky","year":"1981","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2008.09.001","article-title":"Surgical management of failed pyeloplasty in children: single-center experience","volume":"5","author":"Helmy","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Pediatr Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2363","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000180420.11915.31","article-title":"Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review","volume":"174","author":"Thomas","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S0094-0143(05)70008-2","article-title":"Endourologic options for management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the pediatric patient","volume":"25","author":"Figenshau","year":"1998","journal-title":"Urol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.10.021","article-title":"Econdary endoscopic pyelotomy in children with failed pyeloplasty","volume":"77","author":"Veenboer","year":"2011","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)65801-4","article-title":"Management of the failed pyeloplasty","volume":"156","author":"Lim","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02012459","article-title":"Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology","volume":"23","author":"Fernbach","year":"1993","journal-title":"Pediatr Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2010.09566.x","article-title":"Long-term functional and morphological outcome after pyeloplasty for huge renal pelvis","volume":"107","author":"Sarhan","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJU"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)66819-8","article-title":"Outcome analysis of pediatric pyeloplasty as a function of patient age, presentation and differential renal function","volume":"154","author":"Salem","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0055","first-page":"596","article-title":"Difference in results of ultrasonography and diuretic renograms after pyeloplasty in children with unilateral","volume":"50","author":"Park","year":"2009","journal-title":"KJU"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1150","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2007.07033.x","article-title":"Prolonged follow-up after paediatric pyeloplasty: are repeat scans necessary?","volume":"100","author":"Van den Hoek","year":"2007","journal-title":"BJU"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.06.049","article-title":"Failed pyeloplasty in children: revisiting the unknown","volume":"82","author":"Romao","year":"2013","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2571","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.08.050","article-title":"Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analyses of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty","volume":"178","author":"Braga","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.01.046","article-title":"Holmium laser ureteroscopic treatment of various pathologic features in pediatrics","volume":"69","author":"Sofer","year":"2007","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1809","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000055040.19568.ea","article-title":"Long-term followup of pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty: how long is long enough?","volume":"169","author":"Psooy","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1177\/1756287210362070","article-title":"Minimally-invasive correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: do retrograde endo-incision techniques still have a role in the era of laparoscopic pyeloplasty?","volume":"1","author":"Elabd","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ther Adv Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1538","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)64274-5","article-title":"The role of endourological techniques in the treatment of the pediatric ureteropelvic junction","volume":"158","author":"Docimo","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1643","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)62368-1","article-title":"Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction","volume":"160","author":"Tawfiek","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1534","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)64273-3","article-title":"Long-term results of percutaneous endopyelotomy in the treatment of children with failed open pyeloplasty","volume":"158","author":"Capolicchio","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pediatric Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022346818303749?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022346818303749?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,7]],"date-time":"2024-07-07T09:47:44Z","timestamp":1720345664000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0022346818303749"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022346818303749"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3468"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3468","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}