{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,9]],"date-time":"2026-06-09T00:54:31Z","timestamp":1780966471836,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,1]],"date-time":"2019-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1575158400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","jshoulderelbow.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,16]],"date-time":"2019-07-16T20:22:49Z","timestamp":1563308569000},"page":"2308-2316","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":46,"title":["Clinical and radiographic comparison of a hybrid cage glenoid to a cemented polyethylene glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Richard J.","family":"Friedman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emilie","family":"Cheung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sean G.","family":"Grey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pierre-Henri","family":"Flurin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas W.","family":"Wright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph D.","family":"Zuckerman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher P.","family":"Roche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib1","first-page":"2279","article-title":"Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty","volume":"88","author":"Bohsali","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2002.125807","article-title":"Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study","volume":"11","author":"Boileau","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(08)80092-7","article-title":"Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing","volume":"5","author":"Boyd","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1289","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198971090-00003","article-title":"Survivorship of unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty","volume":"71","author":"Brenner","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"709","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2012.07.001","article-title":"A biomechanical analysis of initial fixation options for porous-tantalum-backed glenoid components","volume":"22","author":"Budge","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2012.06.001","article-title":"Results of total shoulder arthroplasty with a monoblock porous tantalum glenoid component: a prospective minimum 2-year follow-up study","volume":"22","author":"Budge","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1410","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.92B10.23578","article-title":"Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement","volume":"92","author":"Castagna","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.12.022","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of a partially cemented glenoid implant: five-year minimum follow-up","volume":"19","author":"Churchill","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198466060-00010","article-title":"Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis","volume":"66","author":"Cofield","year":"1984","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib10","first-page":"6208294","article-title":"Acute failure of a glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty","volume":"2016","author":"Daner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Case Rep Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.15.00410","article-title":"Early debris formation with a porous tantalum glenoid component: radiographic analysis with 2-year minimum follow-up","volume":"98","author":"Endrizzi","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1097\/BTE.0000000000000094","article-title":"Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty using a hybrid glenoid component with a central porous titanium post","volume":"18","author":"Ford","year":"2017","journal-title":"Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2008.11.020","article-title":"Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty","volume":"18","author":"Fox","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.12.021","article-title":"Total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented soft-metal-backed glenoid component","volume":"19","author":"Fucentese","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib15","first-page":"S86","article-title":"Preliminary results of a novel hybrid cage glenoid compared to an all-polyethylene glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty","volume":"73","author":"Grey","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3918","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4558-5","article-title":"No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant","volume":"473","author":"Gulotta","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2078","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2017.07.016","article-title":"Radiographic and clinical comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: midterm results of a prospective randomized study","volume":"26","author":"Kilian","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1174","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200207000-00013","article-title":"The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion","volume":"84-A","author":"Lazarus","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198264030-00001","article-title":"Recent experience in total shoulder replacement","volume":"64","author":"Neer","year":"1982","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1462","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.01.012","article-title":"Five-year minimum clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty using a hybrid glenoid component with a central porous titanium post","volume":"27","author":"Nelson","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199607000-00014","article-title":"Modern cement technique and the survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty","author":"Norris","year":"1996","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.03.017","article-title":"Cementless versus cemented glenoid components in conventional total shoulder joint arthroplasty: analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry","volume":"27","author":"Page","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib23","first-page":"S57","article-title":"Analysis of glenoid fixation with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in an extreme cyclic loading scenario","volume":"73","author":"Roche","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2017.09.013","article-title":"Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference","volume":"27","author":"Simovitch","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.01613","article-title":"Long-term results of cemented metal-backed glenoid components for osteoarthritis of the shoulder","volume":"91","author":"Tammachote","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2009.10.018","article-title":"Pegged versus keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty","volume":"19","author":"Throckmorton","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199904000-00008","article-title":"Resurfacing of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. A comparison, at a mean of five years, of prostheses inserted with and without cement","volume":"81","author":"Wallace","year":"1999","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2017.09.036","article-title":"Outcomes of trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty","volume":"27","author":"Watson","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1058274619303192?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1058274619303192?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,21]],"date-time":"2025-10-21T00:44:17Z","timestamp":1761007457000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1058274619303192"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S1058274619303192"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049","relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-2746"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-2746","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Clinical and radiographic comparison of a hybrid cage glenoid to a cemented polyethylene glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jse.2019.04.049","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}