{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T02:39:22Z","timestamp":1740105562047,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,1]],"date-time":"2017-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1493596800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004085","name":"Ministry of Education, Science and Technology","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2015R1A2A2A01005153"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2015R1A2A2A01005153"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004085","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003725","name":"National Research Foundation of Korea","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003725","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","journalofsurgicalresearch.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Surgical Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,30]],"date-time":"2017-01-30T07:01:05Z","timestamp":1485759665000},"page":"122-129","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Pain after single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a propensity-matched analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"212","author":[{"given":"Geun Joo","family":"Choi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2844-5880","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hyun","family":"Kang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Beom Gyu","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yoo Shin","family":"Choi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jin Yun","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sangseok","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2787","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-012-1749-z","article-title":"Examining a common disease with unknown etiology: trends in epidemiology and surgical management of appendicitis in California, 1995-2009","volume":"36","author":"Anderson","year":"2012","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-1021466","article-title":"Endoscopic appendectomy","volume":"15","author":"Semm","year":"1983","journal-title":"Endoscopy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib3","first-page":"588","article-title":"Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy)","volume":"37","author":"Pelosi","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E89","DOI":"10.1503\/cjs.023812","article-title":"Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in 688 patients: a retrospective comparative analysis","volume":"57","author":"Liang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Can J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3416-y","article-title":"Single port\/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"Ahmed","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1709","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9296","article-title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy","volume":"100","author":"Markar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001064","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: experiences from 1208 cases of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Experiences from 1208 cases of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy","volume":"262","author":"Kim","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"822","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3735-z","article-title":"Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"29","author":"Xu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4968","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-4840-y","article-title":"Single-port laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis: retrospective comparative analysis for 618 patients","volume":"30","author":"Kang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-013-2328-9","article-title":"Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"18","author":"Hua","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X","article-title":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","volume":"370","author":"von Elm","year":"2007","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-1557(200003\/04)9:2<93::AID-PDS474>3.0.CO;2-I","article-title":"The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research","volume":"9","author":"Perkins","year":"2000","journal-title":"Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwj149","article-title":"Variable selection for propensity score models","volume":"163","author":"Brookhart","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2037","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3150","article-title":"A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003","volume":"27","author":"Austin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.12118","article-title":"Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in children","volume":"7","author":"Miyauchi","year":"2014","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31823003b5","article-title":"Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial","volume":"254","author":"St Peter","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e3182311bd9","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective case series at a single centre in Singapore","volume":"21","author":"Goel","year":"2011","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2220","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-015-3105-6","article-title":"Efficacy of intravenous Lidocaine for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis","volume":"39","author":"Ventham","year":"2015","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-200203000-00019","article-title":"The role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of pain after ambulatory surgery","volume":"94","author":"White","year":"2002","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-013-3219-6","article-title":"Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution","volume":"28","author":"Buckley","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Journal of Surgical Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022480417300422?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022480417300422?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,16]],"date-time":"2022-06-16T00:56:05Z","timestamp":1655340965000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0022480417300422"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"references-count":20,"alternative-id":["S0022480417300422"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-4804"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0022-4804"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Pain after single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a propensity-matched analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Surgical Research","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2017.01.023","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}