{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T06:43:59Z","timestamp":1790664239224,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,1]],"date-time":"2016-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1477958400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["jurology.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Urology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,7]],"date-time":"2016-06-07T17:09:19Z","timestamp":1465319359000},"page":"1458-1466","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":35,"title":["Does Omission of Ureteral Stents Increase Risk of Unplanned Return Visit? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"196","author":[{"given":"Vernon M.","family":"Pais","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire"},{"name":"Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rebecca E.","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth A.","family":"Stedina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cody M.","family":"Rissman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(01)01644-2","article-title":"Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents","volume":"59","author":"Joshi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-011-0697-9","article-title":"Is ureteral stenting really necessary after ureteroscopic lithotripsy with balloon dilatation of ureteral orifice? A multi-institutional randomized controlled study","volume":"29","author":"Ba\u015feskio\u011flu","year":"2011","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1263","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2009.0153","article-title":"Is stent placement necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for removal of impacted ureteral stones?","volume":"24","author":"Cevik","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib4","first-page":"892","article-title":"Ureteral stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"2014","author":"El Harrech","year":"2014","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2007.09.026","article-title":"Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review","volume":"179","author":"Haleblian","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib6","first-page":"1276","article-title":"A prospective randomized trial comparing non-stented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy","volume":"30","author":"Xu","year":"2009","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/S0094-0143(03)00091-0","article-title":"Stenting after ureteroscopy: pros and cons","volume":"31","author":"Knudsen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Urol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39119.595081.55","article-title":"Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"334","author":"Nabi","year":"2007","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1904","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.06.066","article-title":"The results of ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Pengfei","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1287","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0038","article-title":"Practice patterns of ureteral stenting after routine ureteroscopic stone surgery: a survey of practicing urologists","volume":"21","author":"Auge","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.20.383","article-title":"Use of stents after ureteroscopic stone removal","volume":"20","author":"Gerber","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.10.073","article-title":"The effect of ureteral stent placement on post-ureteroscopy complications: a meta-analysis","volume":"71","author":"Makarov","year":"2008","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"151","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.05.085","article-title":"Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2012","volume":"194","author":"Corbyons","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)66320-3","article-title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy","volume":"165","author":"Denstedt","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-009-0175-7","article-title":"Indications of stented uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomized controlled study","volume":"37","author":"Wang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Urol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib17","unstructured":"Wells GA, Shea B, O\u2019Connell D et\u00a0al: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the\u00a0quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available at http:\/\/www.ohri.ca\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/oxford.htm. Accessed May 24, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib18","series-title":"Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.3","year":"2014"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib19","unstructured":"Higgins JPT and Green S: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Updated March 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available at http:\/\/handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed May 24, 2016."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1651","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65646-7","article-title":"Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications","volume":"166","author":"Borboroglu","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib21","first-page":"43","article-title":"Short-time ureteral catheterization after operative ureteroscopic lithotripsy: an alternative to stent versus no stent evaluated in a retrospective study","volume":"81","author":"Canepa","year":"2009","journal-title":"Arch Ital Urol Androl"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1089\/08927790050152140","article-title":"Outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy: selective internal stenting and factors enhancing success","volume":"14","author":"Cheung","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"886","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2006.01434.x","article-title":"Stenting versus non-stenting after non-complicated ureteroscopic manipulation of stones in bilharzial ureters","volume":"13","author":"Hussein","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib24","first-page":"121","article-title":"Is DJ stenting still needed after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"5","author":"Zaki","year":"2010","journal-title":"Pak J Med Health Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1977","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65066-5","article-title":"Is ureteral\u00a0stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial","volume":"167","author":"Chen","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000053763.30693.ef","article-title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial on ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy","volume":"169","author":"Cheung","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2004.04.004","article-title":"Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open","volume":"46","author":"Damiano","year":"2004","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.05.030","article-title":"Role of ureteral stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones: a randomized, controlled trial","volume":"180","author":"Ibrahim","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-008-0136-6","article-title":"Is routine ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm?","volume":"36","author":"Isen","year":"2008","journal-title":"Urol Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"993","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.0236","article-title":"Ureteral access sheath use and stenting in ureteroscopy: effect on unplanned emergency room visits and cost","volume":"21","author":"Rapoport","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(01)00917-7","article-title":"Routine placement of ureteral stents is unnecessary after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi","volume":"57","author":"Hollenbeck","year":"2001","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"580","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.197","article-title":"Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery","volume":"189","author":"Traxer","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022534716305614?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022534716305614?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.jurology.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,29]],"date-time":"2022-04-29T04:40:22Z","timestamp":1651207222000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.jurology.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-5347","1527-3792"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-5347","type":"print"},{"value":"1527-3792","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Does Omission of Ureteral Stents Increase Risk of Unplanned Return Visit? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Journal of Urology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2016.05.109","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 by AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, INC.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}