{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,13]],"date-time":"2026-10-13T15:41:07Z","timestamp":1791906067763,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,1]],"date-time":"2018-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1533081600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["jurology.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Urology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,3]],"date-time":"2018-03-03T23:21:27Z","timestamp":1520119287000},"page":"389-396","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["What Impacts the All Cause Risk of Reoperation after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair? A Comparison of Mesh and Native Tissue Approaches in 110,329 Women"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"200","author":[{"given":"Kai B.","family":"Dallas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lisa","family":"Rogo-Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher S.","family":"Elliott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1299","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.119081","article-title":"Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques","volume":"185","author":"Weber","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2043-9","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse","volume":"24","author":"Jonsson Funk","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31826ebcc2","article-title":"Trends in surgical mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse from 2000 to 2010","volume":"120","author":"Rogo-Gupta","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1459","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31823ed1d9","article-title":"Committee on Gynecologic Practice: Committee Opinion no. 513: vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"118","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e3283648cfb","article-title":"Current trends in surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"25","author":"Rogo-Gupta","year":"2013","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.08.016","article-title":"A multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal mesh in the treatment of post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse","volume":"207","author":"Halaska","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib8","first-page":"83.e81","article-title":"Surgical intervention after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair: retrospective single-center study including 524 patients with 3 years\u2019 median follow-up","volume":"206","author":"De Landsheere","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182479283","article-title":"Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants","volume":"119","author":"Nguyen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822ada95","article-title":"Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure","volume":"118","author":"Withagen","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2015.10.004","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse\u2013vaginal and laparoscopic mesh: the evidence","volume":"43","author":"Richter","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0b013e32835459bb","article-title":"Native tissue repairs in anterior vaginal prolapse surgery: examining definitions of surgical success in the mesh era","volume":"22","author":"Lee","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr Opin Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2016.4200","article-title":"Association between the amount of vaginal mesh used with mesh erosions and repeated surgery after repairing pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence","volume":"152","author":"Chughtai","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31596-3","article-title":"Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT)","volume":"389","author":"Glazener","year":"2017","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib16","first-page":"2092","article-title":"Where there's smoke there's fire: the silicone breast implant controversy continues to flicker: a new disease that needs to be defined","volume":"30","author":"Vasey","year":"2003","journal-title":"Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1666","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199506223322502","article-title":"Breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases and symptoms","volume":"332","author":"S\u00e1nchez-Guerrero","year":"1995","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022534718424159?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022534718424159?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/www.jurology.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,29]],"date-time":"2022-04-29T05:49:08Z","timestamp":1651211348000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.jurology.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-5347","1527-3792"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-5347","type":"print"},{"value":"1527-3792","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"What Impacts the All Cause Risk of Reoperation after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair? A Comparison of Mesh and Native Tissue Approaches in 110,329 Women","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Journal of Urology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2018.02.3093","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 by AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, INC.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}