{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T02:46:55Z","timestamp":1792118815908,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,8,1]],"date-time":"2012-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1343779200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Knee"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,6,19]],"date-time":"2011-06-19T10:32:06Z","timestamp":1308479526000},"page":"356-359","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":71,"title":["Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Daud T.S.","family":"Chou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Girish N.","family":"Swamy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James R.","family":"Lewis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nitin P.","family":"Badhe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.91B1.20899","article-title":"Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial","volume":"91","author":"Newman","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.00210","article-title":"Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement","volume":"89","author":"Furnes","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.3109\/17453671003667267","article-title":"The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (www.knee.se)","volume":"81","author":"Knutson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173020-00005","article-title":"Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement","volume":"73","author":"Padgett","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0025","first-page":"10","article-title":"Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy","volume":"321","author":"Gill","year":"1995","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-5403(96)80179-3","article-title":"Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty","volume":"11","author":"Levine","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0035","first-page":"49","article-title":"Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases","volume":"90","author":"Chatain","year":"2004","journal-title":"Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1016\/0883-5403(94)90102-3","article-title":"Revision total knee arthroplasty. Comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty","volume":"9","author":"Jackson","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0045","first-page":"694","article-title":"Revision in non-infected total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 69 consecutive cases","volume":"86","author":"Bonnin","year":"2000","journal-title":"Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2235","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200212000-00017","article-title":"Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study","volume":"84-A","author":"Argenson","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0055","article-title":"A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty","author":"Price","year":"2010","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0060","series-title":"National Joint Registry for England and Wales 7th Annual Report","year":"2010"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.93B2.25767","article-title":"Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases","volume":"93","author":"Pandit","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.83B1.10871","article-title":"The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty","volume":"83","author":"Robertsson","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1328","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198769090-00004","article-title":"Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty","volume":"69","author":"Barrett","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-008-0585-0","article-title":"Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results","volume":"33","author":"Saragaglia","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-198210000-00016","article-title":"Revision of total knee arthroplasty","volume":"170","author":"Insall","year":"1982","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198870050-00015","article-title":"Results of revision total knee arthroplasties using condylar prostheses. A review of fifty knees","volume":"70","author":"Rand","year":"1988","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2006.11.012","article-title":"The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements","volume":"14","author":"Johnson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Knee"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.92B4.22659","article-title":"Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry","volume":"92","author":"Pearse","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1353","DOI":"10.3928\/0147-7447-20021201-12","article-title":"The effect of implant constraint on results of conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty","volume":"25","author":"Miller","year":"2002","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.89B7.19091","article-title":"The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales","volume":"89","author":"Baker","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"649","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-009-0811-4","article-title":"The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8\u201317years follow-up study of 49 patients","volume":"34","author":"Jarvenpaa","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int Orthop"}],"container-title":["The Knee"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0968016011000780?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0968016011000780?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,25]],"date-time":"2021-11-25T21:35:21Z","timestamp":1637876121000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0968016011000780"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0968016011000780"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.knee.2011.05.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0968-0160"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0968-0160","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]}}}