{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T03:15:43Z","timestamp":1790738143576,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,1]],"date-time":"2025-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764547200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,1]],"date-time":"2025-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764547200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,24]],"date-time":"2025-10-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761264000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","maturitas.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Maturitas"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T05:42:26Z","timestamp":1760852546000},"page":"108755","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"special_numbering":"C","title":["The uterus debate in vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Hysteropexy versus hysterectomy \u2013 A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"203","author":[{"given":"Alessandro Ferdinando","family":"Ruffolo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Salvatore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Torella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matteo","family":"Frigerio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Soligo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chrystele","family":"Rubod","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marine","family":"Lallemant","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michel","family":"Cosson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maurizio","family":"Serati","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Braga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)60462-0","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"369","author":"Jelovsek","year":"2007","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.300.11.1311","article-title":"Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women","volume":"300","author":"Nygaard","year":"2008","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000175832.13266.bb","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"106","author":"Weber","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0020","first-page":"CD004014","article-title":"Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women","volume":"4","author":"Maher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2023.2199926","article-title":"The transvaginal mesh: an overview of indications and contraindications for its use","volume":"20","author":"Ruffolo","year":"2023","journal-title":"Expert Rev. Med. Devices"},{"issue":"16","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4802","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13164802","article-title":"Robotic versus mini-laparoscopic colposacropexy to treat pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective observational cohort study and a medicolegal perspective","volume":"13","author":"Billone","year":"2024","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001396","article-title":"European Urogynaecological Association Position Statement: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery","volume":"29","author":"Padoa","year":"2023","journal-title":"Urogynecology (Phila)."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_rf0040","article-title":"Role of apical support defect: correction inwomen undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery","volume":"26","author":"Alas","year":"2014","journal-title":"Curr Opin ObstetGynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_rf0045","first-page":"CD012376","article-title":"Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse","volume":"10","author":"Maher","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.15343","article-title":"Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"166","author":"Porcari","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0050","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0055","article-title":"ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions","volume":"355","author":"Sterne","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"pt A","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2015.09.002","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited","volume":"45","author":"DerSimonian","year":"2015","journal-title":"Contemp. Clin. Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","article-title":"Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Higgins","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stat. Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","article-title":"Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses","volume":"327","author":"Higgins","year":"2003","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1111\/luts.12104","article-title":"Evaluation of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy vs. Uterosacral Suspension for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Assessment","volume":"9","author":"Al-Badr","year":"2017","journal-title":"Low Urin Tract Symptoms."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2176","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12062176","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus prolapse hysterectomy with apical fixation: a retrospective comparison over an 18 year period","volume":"12","author":"Carlin","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"issue":"351","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0085","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial","volume":"23","author":"Detollenaere","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","article-title":"One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study","volume":"21","author":"Dietz","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001449","article-title":"Subjective Long-Term Outcomes After Vaginal Native Tissue Hysteropexy: Cohort Study","volume":"30","author":"Lange","year":"2024","journal-title":"Urogynecology (Phila)."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920170017","article-title":"Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?","volume":"12","author":"Maher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1867","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04206-2","article-title":"Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study","volume":"31","author":"Milani","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1555","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04641-6","article-title":"Short-term outcomes of sacrospinous hysteropexy through an anterior approach","volume":"32","author":"Plair","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1635-5","article-title":"Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ?","volume":"23","author":"Romanzi","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0120","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in womenwith uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow- up ofa multicentre randomised trial","volume":"366","author":"Schulten","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-024-05750-2","article-title":"Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher","volume":"35","author":"Stoter","year":"2024","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.5213\/inj.2244076.038","article-title":"Bilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy versus bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for apical uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"26","author":"Wang","year":"2022","journal-title":"Int. Neurourol. J."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000001011","article-title":"Perioperative Adverse Events in Women Undergoing Vaginal Prolapse Repair With Uterine Preservation Versus Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Matched Cohort Study","volume":"27","author":"Yuan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.75","article-title":"Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept","volume":"188","author":"Hefni","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-003-1084-x","article-title":"Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms","volume":"14","author":"van Brummen","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.07.006","article-title":"Effects of uterine preservation on long- term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixa tion for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"240","author":"Ng","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","article-title":"Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"de Oliveira","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","article-title":"Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial","volume":"311","author":"Barber","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2329","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05496-3","article-title":"The anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament: how to avoid complications related to the sacrospinous fixation procedure for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"34","author":"Giraudet","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102975","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2025.102975","article-title":"The autologous vaginal patch plastron associated with the anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse: technical note with video demonstration","volume":"54","author":"Ruffolo","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3305","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04863-2","article-title":"How we do an anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse","volume":"32","author":"Declas","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1479","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04149-8","article-title":"How we perform a posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation by the vaginal route","volume":"31","author":"Declas","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","article-title":"Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines","volume":"219","author":"Meriwether","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2548","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12072548","article-title":"Hysteropexy and Anterior Vaginal Native Tissue Repair in Women with Anterior and Central Compartment Prolapse: A Long Term Follow-Up","volume":"12","author":"Serati","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0195","first-page":"683","article-title":"Iliococcygeus fixation for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"76","author":"Braga","year":"2024","journal-title":"Minerva Urol Nephrol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.12863","article-title":"Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: initial experience from a tertiary care hospital","volume":"14","author":"Alay","year":"2021","journal-title":"Asian J. Endosc. Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1111\/ases.13333","article-title":"Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension in patients who had concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for subtotal uterine prolapse","volume":"17","author":"Ekin","year":"2024","journal-title":"Asian J Endosc Surg."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2024.09.007","article-title":"Two-Year Follow-Up on Surgical Outcomes of vNOTES High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study","volume":"32","author":"Ilter","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_rf0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020","article-title":"Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the re -pair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the uterus, a systematic review","volume":"267","author":"Azadi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_rf0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1917","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9","article-title":"Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"33","author":"He","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2025.03.018","article-title":"Associations between hysterectomy and pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"233","author":"Chang","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05086-9","article-title":"Urodynamic profile of voiding in patients with pelvic organ prolapse after surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"Louren\u00e7o","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2518-3","article-title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse on sexual function","volume":"26","author":"Jha","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int. Urogynecol. J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gerinurse.2025.03.060","article-title":"Visit rates and risk factors of healthcare-seeking behavior for urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse among women: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"63","author":"Hou","year":"2025","journal-title":"Geriatr. Nurs."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755_bb0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.31486\/toj.19.0089","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse: a review of in vitro testing of pelvic support mechanisms","volume":"20","author":"Conway","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ochsner J."}],"container-title":["Maturitas"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0378512225005638?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0378512225005638?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,12]],"date-time":"2026-01-12T19:24:22Z","timestamp":1768245862000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0378512225005638"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"references-count":50,"alternative-id":["S0378512225005638"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755","relation":{},"ISSN":["0378-5122"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0378-5122","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The uterus debate in vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Hysteropexy versus hysterectomy \u2013 A systematic review and meta-analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Maturitas","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.maturitas.2025.108755","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"108755"}}