{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T18:44:37Z","timestamp":1792262677953,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":71,"publisher":"MDPI AG","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,25]],"date-time":"2018-01-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1516838400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":389,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medicina"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,9]],"date-time":"2018-02-09T13:24:39Z","timestamp":1518182679000},"page":"357-364","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Fetal biometry: Relevance in obstetrical practice"],"prefix":"10.3390","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"Bronius","family":"\u017dali\u016bnas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daiva","family":"Bartkevi\u010dien\u0117","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gra\u017eina","family":"Dr\u0105sutien\u0117","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Algirdas","family":"Utkus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Juozas","family":"Kurmanavi\u010dius","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1968","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0360","series-title":"Mosby's Medical Dictionary","author":"A-mode","year":"2009"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0365","series-title":"Medical Dictionary for the Health Professions and Nursing","author":"B-mode","year":"2012"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3182446e9b","article-title":"Fetal biometry: relevance in obstetrical practice","volume":"55","author":"March","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0375","first-page":"213","article-title":"A Short history of sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"5","author":"Campbell","year":"2013","journal-title":"Facts Views Vis ObGyn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0380","series-title":"History of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology [Internet]","article-title":"A short history of the development of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology","author":"Woo","year":"2008"},{"issue":"7032","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1188","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(58)91905-6","article-title":"Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound","volume":"1","author":"Donald","year":"1958","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0390","volume":"vol. 5","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1964.tb04236.x","article-title":"Foetal cephalometry by ultrasound","volume":"71","author":"Willocks","year":"1964","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1968.tb00161.x","article-title":"An improved method of fetal cephalometry by ultrasound","volume":"75","author":"Campbell","year":"1968","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00708.x","article-title":"Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight","volume":"82","author":"Campbell","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7789","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(72)92273-8","article-title":"Anencephaly: early ultrasonic diagnosis and active management","volume":"2","author":"Campbell","year":"1972","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1159\/000020840","article-title":"Debate about ultrasound screening policies","volume":"13","author":"Antsaklis","year":"1998","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01346.x","article-title":"Quality of controlled clinical trials. The case of imaging ultrasound in obstetrics: a review","volume":"92","author":"Thacker","year":"1985","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-200103000-00023","article-title":"Fetal biometry: clinical, pathological, and technical considerations","volume":"56","author":"Degani","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90274-U","article-title":"Embryonic ultrasonographic measurements: crown-rump length revisited","volume":"165","author":"Goldstein","year":"1991","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)91196-1","article-title":"A comparison of the reliability of the estimated date of confinement predicted by crown-rump length and biparietal diameter","volume":"145","author":"Kopta","year":"1983","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5225","article-title":"New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study","volume":"31","author":"Verburg","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x","article-title":"A critical evaluation of sonar \u201ccrown-rump length\u201d measurements","volume":"82","author":"Robinson","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8884","article-title":"Clinical implications of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown-rump length at 6\u20139 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"38","author":"Pexsters","year":"2011","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(12)90842-X","article-title":"Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement","volume":"168","author":"Daya","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0460","series-title":"Liet aku\u0161 ir ginekol [Internet]","article-title":"Ultragarsin\u0117 biometrija. I. Gestacinio am\u017eiaus nustatymas","author":"Kurmanavi\u010dius","year":"2010"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.138.5.871","article-title":"Fetal biparietal diameter: rational choice of plane of section for sonographic measurement","volume":"138","author":"Hadlock","year":"1982","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08212.x","article-title":"Fetal ultrasound biometry: 1. Head reference values","volume":"106","author":"Kurmanavicius","year":"1999","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0475","first-page":"7","article-title":"Sonar BPD and fetal age. Definition of the relationship","volume":"43","author":"Sabbagha","year":"1974","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1991.10.10.557","article-title":"How accurate is second trimester fetal dating?","volume":"10","author":"Hadlock","year":"1991","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-3782(97)01881-1","article-title":"Transvaginal fetal biometry in early pregnancy","volume":"49","author":"Rosati","year":"1997","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0490","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(76)90643-8","article-title":"Sonar biparietal diameter. I. Analysis of percentile growth differences in two normal populations using same methodology","volume":"126","author":"Sabbagha","year":"1976","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12550.x","article-title":"Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation","volume":"84","author":"Campbell","year":"1977","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.03.047","article-title":"Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation","volume":"178","author":"Schmidt","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0505","series-title":"Obstetric measurements and gestational age. Textbook of diagnostic sonography","first-page":"1147","author":"Hagen-Ansert","year":"2012"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0510","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70477-6","article-title":"How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?","volume":"178","author":"Chervenak","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0515","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1982.1.9.359","article-title":"An evaluation of two methods for measuring fetal head and body circumferences","volume":"1","author":"Hadlock","year":"1982","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0520","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.4103\/0971-3026.76055","article-title":"Pictorial essay: the many faces of craniosynostosis","volume":"21","author":"Khanna","year":"2011","journal-title":"Indian J Radiol Imaging"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0525","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.5507\/bp.2007.055","article-title":"Discrepancy in ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC \u2013 head circumference, BPD \u2013 biparietal diameter) in breech presented fetuses","volume":"151","author":"Lubusky","year":"2007","journal-title":"Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0530","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.10.004","article-title":"Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur","volume":"127","author":"Johnsen","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0535","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1987.6.8.437","article-title":"Significance of ultrasound measurements of the head of the breech fetus","volume":"6","author":"Bader","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0540","first-page":"154","article-title":"The \u201cbreech head\u201d and its relevance","volume":"133","author":"Haberkern","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Dis Child"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0545","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb04674.x","article-title":"The breech head and its ultrasound significance","volume":"89","author":"Kasby","year":"1982","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0550","series-title":"Human malformations and related anomalies","first-page":"257","author":"Stevenson","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0555","series-title":"Ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Donald school textbook of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology","first-page":"168","author":"Kurjak","year":"2008"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0560","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1985.4.10.525","article-title":"A comparison of sector and linear array scanners for the measurement of the fetal femur","volume":"4","author":"Jeanty","year":"1985","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0565","first-page":"69","article-title":"Fetal femur length: a critical reevaluation of the relationship to menstrual age","volume":"66","author":"Warda","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0570","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90713-4","article-title":"Growth of the ultrasound fetal femur length during normal pregnancy. Part I","volume":"141","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0575","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00691.x","article-title":"Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10\u201325 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios","volume":"84","author":"Johnsen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0580","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1179\/174227104225011731","article-title":"Anomalies in fetal dating","volume":"12","author":"Dudley","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0585","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","article-title":"Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements \u2013 a prospective study","volume":"151","author":"Hadlock","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0590","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.4137\/CMPed.S40070","article-title":"Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects","volume":"10","author":"Sharma","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Med Insights Pediatr"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0595","first-page":"663","article-title":"Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis","volume":"65","author":"Kramer","year":"1987","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0600","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2002-25313","article-title":"Diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of ultrasound parameters","volume":"19","author":"Ott","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0605","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3476(67)80066-0","article-title":"A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age","volume":"71","author":"Battaglia","year":"1967","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0610","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.141.5.979","article-title":"A date-independent predictor of intrauterine growth retardation: femur length\/abdominal circumference ratio","volume":"141","author":"Hadlock","year":"1983","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0615","first-page":"631","article-title":"Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus","volume":"69","author":"Brown","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0620","first-page":"584","article-title":"Value of fetal ponderal index in predicting growth retardation","volume":"67","author":"Vintzileos","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0625","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199203000-00015","article-title":"Intrauterine growth retardation: definition, classification, and etiology","volume":"35","author":"Pollack","year":"1992","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0630","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(77)90464-1","article-title":"Prediction of intrauterine growth retardation by determination of total intrauterine volume","volume":"127","author":"Gohari","year":"1977","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0635","first-page":"501","article-title":"The sonographic assessment of twin growth discordancy","volume":"84","author":"Hill","year":"1994","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0640","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1901","article-title":"The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry","volume":"25","author":"Salomon","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0645","first-page":"62","article-title":"Reference interval for fetal biometry in Italian population","volume":"3","author":"Giorlandino","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Prenat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0650","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-3782(99)00049-3","article-title":"Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups","volume":"57","author":"Jacquemyn","year":"2000","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0655","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/23.1.119","article-title":"Differences in gestational age-specific birthweight among Chinese, Japanese and White Americans","volume":"23","author":"Wang","year":"1994","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0660","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-8-1","article-title":"Does one size fit all? The case for ethnic-specific standards of fetal growth","volume":"8","author":"Kierans","year":"2008","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0665","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2002.21.7.719","article-title":"Maternal ethnicity and variation of fetal femur length calculations when screening for Down syndrome","volume":"21","author":"Kovac","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0670","first-page":"746","article-title":"Fetal biometry between 20\u201342 weeks of gestation for Polish population","volume":"79","author":"Dubiel","year":"2008","journal-title":"Ginekol Pol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 2","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0675","first-page":"593","article-title":"Fetal biometric data obtained in a sole population with emphasis to sex differences","volume":"1","author":"Levi","year":"1983","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0680","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0096(199811\/12)26:9<433::AID-JCU3>3.0.CO;2-O","article-title":"Ultrasound fetal biometry charts for a North American Caucasian population","volume":"26","author":"Lessoway","year":"1998","journal-title":"J Clin Ultrasound"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0685","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.966","article-title":"Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15\u201340 weeks of gestation","volume":"23","author":"Schw\u00e4rzler","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0690","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2013.32.1.35","article-title":"Fetal sex and intrauterine growth patterns","volume":"32","author":"Melamed","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0695","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.942","article-title":"Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound","volume":"23","author":"Schild","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0700","first-page":"11","article-title":"Analysis of fetal biometric measurements in the last 30 years","volume":"2","author":"Buscicchio","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Prenat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0705","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.11010030.x","article-title":"How to construct \u201cnormal ranges\u201d for fetal variables","volume":"11","author":"Royston","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004_bib0710","series-title":"Prenatal diagnosis of fetal hypotrophy","author":"Alisauskas","year":"1980"}],"container-title":["Medicina"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1010660X18300077?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1010660X18300077?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,7]],"date-time":"2018-05-07T20:07:32Z","timestamp":1525723652000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1010660X18300077"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"references-count":71,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"alternative-id":["S1010660X18300077"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.medici.2018.01.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["1010-660X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1010-660X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}