{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T16:14:58Z","timestamp":1783440898240,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788220800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780358400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Midwifery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T23:24:10Z","timestamp":1780356250000},"page":"104884","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Predictive models for estimating the duration of labour induction: A systematic review and critical appraisal"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"160","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-9872-4516","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Toni","family":"Gouaz\u00e9","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexandra","family":"Musso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J\u00e9r\u00f4me","family":"Delotte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sandra","family":"Maccagnan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aur\u00e9lie","family":"Autret","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sara","family":"Contu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aram","family":"Hovhannisyan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amanda","family":"Garrido","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jocelyn","family":"Gal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Renaud","family":"Schiappa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julie","family":"Ducray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emmanuel","family":"Chamorey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0001","article-title":"Validating machine learning models for the prediction of labour induction intervention using routine data: a registry-based retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in northern Tanzania","volume":"11","author":"Abubakari","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0002","first-page":"386","article-title":"Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor","volume":"114","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obs. Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2232-8","article-title":"Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction","volume":"19","author":"Alavifard","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMC Preg. Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0004","first-page":"175","article-title":"The reporting of prognostic prediction models for obstetric care was suboptimal: a systematic review","volume":"149","author":"Al Khalifah","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Clin. Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0005","first-page":"345","article-title":"Trends in the use of induction of labour by methods and gestational age in Victoria, Australia: a population-based study (2012\u20132020)","volume":"38","author":"Aziz","year":"2025","journal-title":"Women Birth."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0006","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obs. Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.003","article-title":"Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age","volume":"195","author":"Caughey","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am. J. Obs. Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-0697","article-title":"Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement","volume":"162","author":"Collins","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann. Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.005","article-title":"Prediction models for determining the success of labour induction: a systematic review and critical analysis","volume":"79","author":"D'Souza","year":"2022","journal-title":"Best Pr. Res. Clin. Obs. Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2020.102663","article-title":"Dissatisfaction of women with induction of labour according to parity: results of a population-based cohort study","volume":"84","author":"Dupont","year":"2020","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14953","article-title":"Predicting vaginal delivery after labor induction using machine learning: development of a multivariable prediction model","volume":"104","author":"Ferreira","year":"2025","journal-title":"Acta Obs. Gynecol. Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women","volume":"379","author":"Grobman","year":"2018","journal-title":"N Engl. J. Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0013","first-page":"665.e1","article-title":"Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a validated model","volume":"226","author":"Grobman","year":"2022","journal-title":"Am. J. Obs. Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0014","series-title":"D\u00e9clenchement Artificiel Du Travail \u00e0 Partir De 37 Semaines D'am\u00e9norrh\u00e9e","year":"2008"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000210528.32940.c6","article-title":"Comparison of labour progression between induced and non-induced multiparous women","volume":"107","author":"Hoffman","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obs. Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.06.007","article-title":"Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor","volume":"203","author":"Ivars","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2021.08.031","article-title":"Use of artificial intelligence to predict mean time to delivery following cervical ripening with dinoprostone vaginal insert","volume":"266","author":"Jouffray","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0018","first-page":"1070","article-title":"An externally validated model to predict prolonged induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix","volume":"40","author":"Kawakita","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am. J. Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004039","article-title":"Externally validated prediction model of vaginal delivery after preterm induction with unfavorable cervix","volume":"136","author":"Kawakita","year":"2020","journal-title":"Obs. Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-025-07379-5","article-title":"Trends in induction of labour and associated maternal co-morbidities: a population-based study in Western Australia (2005\u20132020)","volume":"25","author":"Lee","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Preg. Childbirth"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0021","article-title":"Blondel B and ENP2021 study group. Results of the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey and trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France since 1995","volume":"51","author":"Le Ray","year":"2022","journal-title":"J. Gynecol. Obs. Hum. Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9910","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-019-46101-2","article-title":"A mathematical model to predict mean time to delivery following cervical ripening with dinoprostone vaginal insert","volume":"9","author":"Levast","year":"2019","journal-title":"Sci. Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6855","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-33974-7","article-title":"Prediction of an effective cervical ripenning in the induction of labour using vaginal dinoprostone","volume":"13","author":"L\u00f3pez Jim\u00e9nez","year":"2023","journal-title":"Sci. Rep."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13589","article-title":"Prediction models for determining the success of labor induction: a systematic review","volume":"98","author":"Meier","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Obs. Gynecol. Scand"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.130925","article-title":"Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"186","author":"Mishanina","year":"2014","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001744","article-title":"Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist","volume":"11","author":"Moons","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0027","series-title":"Inducing Labour (NG207)","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0028","series-title":"PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram","author":"Page","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0029","series-title":"PRISMA 2020 Checklist","author":"Page","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0030","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0031","first-page":"596","article-title":"Examining users\u2019 Acceptance intention of health applications based on the technology acceptance model","volume":"13","author":"Park","year":"2025","journal-title":"Healthc. (Basel)"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0033","article-title":"A predictive model for successfully inducing active labor among women undergoing labor induction","volume":"5","author":"Rouse","year":"2023","journal-title":"Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0034","series-title":"Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating","author":"Steyerberg","year":"2019"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obs. Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obs. Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-1376","article-title":"PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies","volume":"170","author":"Wolff","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ann. Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0038","series-title":"WHO recommendations: Induction of Labour At Or Beyond term. Geneva","year":"2018"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0039","first-page":"671","article-title":"External validation of prediction models for vaginal delivery after the cesarean section","volume":"23","author":"Yu","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Preg. Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2647","DOI":"10.1177\/0300060519845780","article-title":"Prediction of the induction to delivery time interval in vaginal dinoprostone-induced labor: a retrospective study in a Chinese tertiary maternity hospital","volume":"47","author":"Zhao","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Int. Med. Res"}],"container-title":["Midwifery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0266613826001889?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0266613826001889?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T15:16:39Z","timestamp":1783437399000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0266613826001889"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"references-count":39,"alternative-id":["S0266613826001889"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884","relation":{},"ISSN":["0266-6138"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0266-6138","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Predictive models for estimating the duration of labour induction: A systematic review and critical appraisal","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Midwifery","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2026.104884","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"104884"}}