{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,4]],"date-time":"2025-10-04T08:14:14Z","timestamp":1759565654511},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,1]],"date-time":"2016-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1472688000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.theclinics.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","theclinics.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,11]],"date-time":"2016-08-11T05:24:46Z","timestamp":1470893086000},"page":"495-515","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Evidence Basis for Hysterectomy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Jenifer N.","family":"Byrnes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emanuel C.","family":"Trabuco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf","article-title":"Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States","volume":"122","author":"Wright","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e11","DOI":"10.2196\/ijmr.3160","article-title":"The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes","volume":"3","author":"Pitter","year":"2014","journal-title":"Interact J Med Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1380","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11652.x","article-title":"Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome","volume":"107","author":"Ottosen","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2003.00115.x","article-title":"Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"82","author":"Miskry","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1132","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0412.2002.811206.x","article-title":"Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6\u00a0cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized study","volume":"81","author":"Hwang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00271-6","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"83","author":"Ribeiro","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1561","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127596","article-title":"Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"187","author":"Benassi","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-005-0118-7","article-title":"Abdominal vs vaginal hysterectomy: a comparative study of the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction","volume":"274","author":"Silva-Filho","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003677.pub4","article-title":"Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease","author":"Nieboer","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003677.pub5","article-title":"Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease","author":"Aarts","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.09.003","article-title":"Comparison of the different types of \u201claparoscopic total hysterectomy\u201d","volume":"14","author":"Leung","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib12","first-page":"624","article-title":"A\u00a0classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy","volume":"82","author":"Munro","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.09.005","article-title":"Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysterectomy: meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Guo","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-010-1778-5","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective randomised study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of benign diseases of the uterus","volume":"284","author":"Roy","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.026","article-title":"Postoperative pain after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a randomized trial","volume":"203","author":"Ghezzi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.10.019","article-title":"A\u00a0prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease","volume":"148","author":"Drahonovsky","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.07.006","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal, and minilaparotomy hysterectomies for enlarged myomatous uteri","volume":"103","author":"Sesti","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.08.015","article-title":"Value of laparoscopic assistance for vaginal hysterectomy with prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy","volume":"194","author":"Agostini","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7432","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37984.623889.F6","article-title":"The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy","volume":"328","author":"Garry","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib20","first-page":"712","article-title":"Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study","volume":"97","author":"Dara\u00ef","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib21","first-page":"337","article-title":"Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study","volume":"80","author":"Soriano","year":"2001","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"8941","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(95)91158-8","article-title":"Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time?","volume":"345","author":"Richardson","year":"1995","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib23","first-page":"895","article-title":"Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting","volume":"80","author":"Summitt","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a4ee4d","article-title":"Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease","volume":"122","author":"Rosero","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1038","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000244","article-title":"An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy","volume":"123","author":"Wright","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000090","article-title":"Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy","volume":"123","author":"Woelk","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.12.007","article-title":"AAGL position statement: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology","volume":"20","author":"AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib28","first-page":"80","article-title":"Calculating the true cost of robotic hysterectomy","volume":"68","author":"Tiwari","year":"2014","journal-title":"Healthc Financ Manage"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"120.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.09.028","article-title":"Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy","volume":"210","author":"Dayaratna","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.10.008","article-title":"A\u00a0comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches","volume":"21","author":"Martino","year":"2014","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181af36e3","article-title":"Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures","volume":"114","author":"Kho","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318264f848","article-title":"Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure","volume":"120","author":"Uccella","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"794","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31822f1c92","article-title":"Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy","volume":"118","author":"Hur","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.08.009","article-title":"Transvaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: is vaginal cuff closure associated with a reduced risk?","volume":"125","author":"Iaco","year":"2006","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000115507.26155.45","article-title":"Characteristics of patients with vaginal rupture and evisceration","volume":"103","author":"Croak","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2006.11.005","article-title":"Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies","volume":"14","author":"Hur","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.03.024","article-title":"Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature","volume":"205","author":"Uccella","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2010.08.035","article-title":"Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy","volume":"120","author":"Nick","year":"2011","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00276-8","article-title":"Vaginal removal of the benign nonprolapsed uterus: experience with 300 consecutive operations","volume":"94","author":"Figueiredo","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70011-0","article-title":"Vaginal hysterectomy in women with history of previous cesarean delivery","volume":"179","author":"Unger","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1521","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.129165","article-title":"Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population","volume":"187","author":"Kovac","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.064","article-title":"Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population-based cohort study","volume":"197","author":"Blandon","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.012","article-title":"Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications","volume":"198","author":"Altman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000278567.37925.4e","article-title":"Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy","volume":"110","author":"D\u00e4llenbach","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3182309a22","article-title":"Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training","volume":"17","author":"Burkett","year":"2011","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854516300225?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854516300225?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,12]],"date-time":"2019-09-12T11:58:16Z","timestamp":1568289496000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0889854516300225"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0889854516300225"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0889-8545"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0889-8545","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Evidence Basis for Hysterectomy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2016.04.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}