{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T18:41:31Z","timestamp":1790880091517,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":82,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,1]],"date-time":"2017-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1512086400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.theclinics.com","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","theclinics.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,26]],"date-time":"2017-10-26T12:21:04Z","timestamp":1509020464000},"page":"631-643","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":37,"title":["Fetal Malpresentation and Malposition"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Rachel A.","family":"Pilliod","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aaron B.","family":"Caughey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.01.026","article-title":"Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery","volume":"210","author":"Caughey","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000647","article-title":"Persistent occiput posterior","volume":"125","author":"Barth","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00246-3","article-title":"Breech presentation is a risk factor for intrapartum and neonatal death in preterm delivery","volume":"93","author":"Demol","year":"2000","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","article-title":"The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study","volume":"166","author":"Hickok","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib5","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2015","volume":"66","author":"Martin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2010.02576.x","article-title":"Recurrence of breech presentation in consecutive pregnancies","volume":"117","author":"Ford","year":"2010","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(99)00116-2","article-title":"Small fetal size: a risk factor for breech birth at term","volume":"67","author":"Roberts","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-994093","article-title":"Increased incidence of fetal growth restriction in association with breech presentation in preterm deliveries <32\u00a0weeks","volume":"14","author":"Sherer","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.01.029","article-title":"Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor","volume":"191","author":"Chou","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"558.e1-5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.07.022","article-title":"Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes","volume":"205","author":"Hua","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181f7496d","article-title":"Leiomyomas at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination and adverse obstetric outcomes","volume":"116","author":"Stout","year":"2010","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4283-7","article-title":"Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors-a nationwide population based cohort study","volume":"295","author":"Macharey","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12834","article-title":"Breech presentation: its predictors and consequences. An analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer Obstetric Database (1996-2011)","volume":"95","author":"Zsirai","year":"2016","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00323.x","article-title":"Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital","volume":"112","author":"Pradhan","year":"2005","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01507.x","article-title":"Term breech presentation in the Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants","volume":"110","author":"Rietberg","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib16","first-page":"783","article-title":"External cephalic version: predictors of success","volume":"94","author":"Aisenbrey","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000184.pub4","article-title":"Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version","author":"Cluver","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"630.e1-7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.008","article-title":"Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis","volume":"199","author":"Kok","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182324583","article-title":"Effect of regional anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"118","author":"Goetzinger","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.04.036","article-title":"Neuraxial analgesia to increase the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"215","author":"Magro-Malosso","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade","article-title":"External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis","volume":"112","author":"Grootscholten","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9239","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.004","article-title":"Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial","volume":"191","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.056","article-title":"Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial","volume":"191","author":"Whyte","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1694","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127902","article-title":"Mode of delivery and outcome of 699 term singleton breech deliveries at a single center","volume":"187","author":"Giuliani","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(00)00447-4","article-title":"Term breech and long-term morbidity \u2013 cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery","volume":"96","author":"Munstedt","year":"2001","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000113625.29073.4c","article-title":"Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: still a safe option","volume":"103","author":"Alarab","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1916","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91432-3","article-title":"Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor","volume":"172","author":"Laros","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(94)90169-4","article-title":"Incidence and contribution of predisposing factors to transverse lie presentation","volume":"44","author":"Gemer","year":"1994","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-999449","article-title":"Transverse lie","volume":"7","author":"Hankins","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00140-6","article-title":"Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse","volume":"78","author":"Uygur","year":"2002","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050802037647","article-title":"Face and brow presentation: independent risk factors","volume":"21","author":"Bashiri","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.11.029","article-title":"Face presentation: predictors and delivery route","volume":"194","author":"Shaffer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"540","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01105.x","article-title":"Malpresentations\u2013impact on mode of delivery","volume":"90","author":"Gardberg","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib35","series-title":"Malpresentation and malposition. Management of labor and delivery","first-page":"172","author":"Cheng","year":"2015"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050701288325","article-title":"Spinal cord injuries at birth: a multicenter review of nine cases","volume":"20","author":"Vialle","year":"2007","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2004.12.005","article-title":"Labor with abnormal presentation and position","volume":"32","author":"Stitely","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib38","first-page":"419","article-title":"Compound presentation: a survey of 131 patients","volume":"32","author":"Breen","year":"1968","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib39","first-page":"59","article-title":"Compound presentation; a survey of 65 cases","volume":"1","author":"Goplerud","year":"1953","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500460133","article-title":"Unusual rectal trauma due to compound fetal presentation","volume":"26","author":"Byrne","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib41","first-page":"40","article-title":"Forearm injury associated with compound presentation and prolonged labour","volume":"4","author":"Kwok","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Neonatal Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6661(199909\/10)8:5<231::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-J","article-title":"Congenital ischemic forearm necrosis associated with a compound presentation","volume":"8","author":"Tebes","year":"1999","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000206217.07883.a2","article-title":"The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes","volume":"107","author":"Cheng","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib44","first-page":"1027","article-title":"Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome","volume":"98","author":"Fitzpatrick","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib45","first-page":"749","article-title":"Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas","volume":"96","author":"Sizer","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5\u00a0Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000158861.43593.49","article-title":"Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia","volume":"105","author":"Lieberman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349409013392","article-title":"Persistent occiput posterior presentation\u2013a clinical problem","volume":"73","author":"Gardberg","year":"1994","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14821","article-title":"Prospective multicenter study of ultrasound-based measurements of fetal head station and position throughout labor","volume":"46","author":"Vitner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor","volume":"19","author":"Sherer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x","article-title":"Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor","volume":"19","author":"Sherer","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib51","first-page":"915","article-title":"Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes","volume":"101","author":"Ponkey","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15808","article-title":"Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery","volume":"48","author":"Ghi","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.00046.x","article-title":"Recurrent persistent occipito-posterior position in subsequent deliveries","volume":"111","author":"Gardberg","year":"2004","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000331.pub3","article-title":"Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour","author":"Anim-Somuah","year":"2011","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000154889.47063.84","article-title":"Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome","volume":"105","author":"Senecal","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"856","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.06.017","article-title":"The relationship of fetal position and ethnicity with shoulder dystocia and birth injury","volume":"195","author":"Cheng","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003710276","article-title":"Manual rotation to reduce caesarean delivery in persistent occiput posterior or transverse position","volume":"24","author":"Shaffer","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"5\u00a0Pt\u00a01","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib58","first-page":"746","article-title":"Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries","volume":"91","author":"Gardberg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.026","article-title":"Significance of accidental extensions in the lower uterine segment during cesarean delivery","volume":"194","author":"de la Torre","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306.e1-5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.07.005","article-title":"Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor","volume":"197","author":"Sung","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1064","article-title":"Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography","volume":"24","author":"Akmal","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000255972.48257.83","article-title":"Impact on delivery outcome of ultrasonographic fetal head position prior to induction of labor","volume":"109","author":"Peregrine","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314617","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/314617","article-title":"Fetal head position during the first stage of labor: comparison between vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasound","volume":"2014","author":"Shetty","year":"2014","journal-title":"ISRN Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.103","article-title":"Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery","volume":"21","author":"Akmal","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001","article-title":"Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study","volume":"164","author":"Ramphul","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.011","article-title":"Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor","volume":"193","author":"Zahalka","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2199","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13855","article-title":"Maternal positioning to correct occiput posterior fetal position during the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Guittier","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001063.pub3","article-title":"Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior)","author":"Hunter","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0730-7659.2005.00382.x","article-title":"Randomized controlled trial of hands-and-knees positioning for occipitoposterior position in labor","volume":"32","author":"Stremler","year":"2005","journal-title":"Birth"},{"issue":"7438","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.37942.594456.44","article-title":"Randomised controlled trial of effect of hands and knees posturing on incidence of occiput posterior position at birth","volume":"328","author":"Kariminia","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"60.e1-8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.10.882","article-title":"Is maternal posturing during labor efficient in preventing persistent occiput posterior position? A randomized controlled trial","volume":"208","author":"Desbriere","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511.e1-7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.05.033","article-title":"Lateral asymmetric decubitus position for the rotation of occipito-posterior positions: multicenter randomized controlled trial EVADELA","volume":"215","author":"Le Ray","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"634","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182a10e43","article-title":"Manual rotation to decrease operative delivery in posterior or transverse positions","volume":"122","author":"Le Ray","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000281666.04924.be","article-title":"Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate","volume":"110","author":"Le Ray","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.12.025","article-title":"Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section","volume":"136","author":"Reichman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.029","article-title":"Manual rotation of the fetal occiput: predictors of success and delivery","volume":"194","author":"Shaffer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12199","article-title":"A\u00a0re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour","volume":"120","author":"Tempest","year":"2013","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.11.047","article-title":"The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries","volume":"192","author":"Benavides","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31829752fc","article-title":"Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries","volume":"122","author":"Bradley","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31828b72cb","article-title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery","volume":"121","author":"Stock","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.075","article-title":"Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury","volume":"191","author":"Damron","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30647-8","article-title":"Guidelines for operative vaginal birth","volume":"26","author":"Cargill","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Obstet Gynaecol Can"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854517301134?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854517301134?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,26]],"date-time":"2018-08-26T09:52:48Z","timestamp":1535277168000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0889854517301134"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"references-count":82,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0889854517301134"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["0889-8545"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0889-8545","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Fetal Malpresentation and Malposition","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.08.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}