{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,19]],"date-time":"2026-08-19T19:53:35Z","timestamp":1787169215875,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598918400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,1]],"date-time":"2020-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598918400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","theclinics.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,5]],"date-time":"2020-06-05T21:50:49Z","timestamp":1591393849000},"page":"429-437","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Reducing Cesarean Delivery Surgical Site Complications"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"Margaret S.","family":"Villers","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.3201\/eid0705.010511","article-title":"Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections","volume":"7","author":"Yokoe","year":"2001","journal-title":"Emerg Infect Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1231","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1602044","article-title":"Adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery","volume":"375","author":"Tita","year":"2016","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S819","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.09.012","article-title":"Factors associated with 30-day readmissions for cesarean delivery surgical site infections","volume":"215","author":"Villers","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1279","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002333","article-title":"Adding azithromycin to cephalosporin for cesarean delivery infection prophylaxis: a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"130","author":"Skeith","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000384","article-title":"Extreme obesity and postcesarean maternal complications","volume":"124","author":"Stamilio","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2012.12.012","article-title":"The relationship between obesity and surgical site infections in women undergoing caesarean sections: an integrative review","volume":"29","author":"Anderson","year":"2013","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib7","first-page":"638936","article-title":"Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review","volume":"2014","author":"Pierpont","year":"2014","journal-title":"ISRN Obes"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.08.006","article-title":"Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations (part 2)","volume":"219","author":"Caughey","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247.e1-.e9","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.04.012","article-title":"Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3)","volume":"221","author":"Macones","year":"2019","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002249","article-title":"Evidence-based bundles and cesarean delivery surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"130","author":"Carter","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003091","article-title":"Reducing cesarean delivery surgical site infections: a resident-driven quality initiative","volume":"133","author":"Kawakita","year":"2019","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002834","article-title":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199 summary: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery","volume":"132","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"708","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001064","article-title":"Obstetric surgical site infections: 2 grams compared with 3 grams of cefazolin in morbidly obese women","volume":"126","author":"Ahmadzia","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib14","first-page":"365","article-title":"Improving the effectiveness of penicillin allergy de-labeling","volume":"3","author":"Bourke","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Allergy Clin Immunol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e108","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocv139","article-title":"Identifying opportunities in EHR to improve the quality of antibiotic allergy data","volume":"23","author":"Moskow","year":"2015","journal-title":"J\u00a0Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e167","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1685503","article-title":"Efficacy of non-beta-lactam antibiotics for prevention of cesarean delivery surgical site infections","volume":"9","author":"Harris","year":"2019","journal-title":"AJP Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1511048","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery","volume":"374","author":"Tuuli","year":"2016","journal-title":"N\u00a0Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463.e1-e8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.05.060","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial","volume":"217","author":"Springel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001118","article-title":"Skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"126","author":"Ngai","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajic.2009.10.004","article-title":"Educational intervention, revised instrument sterilization methods, and comprehensive preoperative skin preparation protocol reduce cesarean section surgical site infections","volume":"38","author":"Rauk","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Infect Control"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002167","article-title":"Vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"130","author":"Caissutti","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib22","article-title":"Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections","author":"Haas","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.08.010","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized trial that compared povidone iodine and chlorhexidine as antiseptics for vaginal hysterectomy","volume":"192","author":"Culligan","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001899","article-title":"Risk factors for postcesarean maternal infection in a trial of extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis","volume":"129","author":"Boggess","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271.e1-7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.049","article-title":"Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient","volume":"203","author":"Alanis","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1570339","article-title":"Abdominal incision selection for cesarean delivery of women with class III obesity","volume":"33","author":"Sutton","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib27","article-title":"Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section","author":"Mathai","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0114190","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0114190","article-title":"Caesarean section: could different transverse abdominal incision techniques influence postpartum pain and subsequent quality of life? A systematic review","volume":"10","author":"Gizzo","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00204-X","article-title":"Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial","volume":"388","author":"Abalos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000124807.76451.47","article-title":"Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis","volume":"103","author":"Chelmow","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1607","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.03.063","article-title":"Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery","volume":"193","author":"Berghella","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827a072c","article-title":"Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"121","author":"Figueroa","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31820ad61e","article-title":"Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"117","author":"Tuuli","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000227","article-title":"Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"123","author":"Mackeen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.501","article-title":"Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques","volume":"206","author":"Schrufer-Poland","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"838","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-475X.2007.00287.x","article-title":"Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on fibroblast viability, chemotactic signaling, and proliferation in a provisional wound (fibrin) matrix","volume":"15","author":"McNulty","year":"2007","journal-title":"Wound Repair Regen"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000634","article-title":"Prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy after cesarean delivery","volume":"125","author":"Echebiri","year":"2015","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.09.017","article-title":"Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean is associated with reduced risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"218","author":"Yu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"628","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15413","article-title":"Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial","volume":"126","author":"Hyldig","year":"2019","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-013-1813-2","article-title":"Necrotizing fasciitis: an urgent diagnosis","volume":"43","author":"Paz Maya","year":"2014","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9763470","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/9763470","article-title":"Fulminating postcaesarean necrotising fasciitis: a rare and lethal condition successfully managed in a resource-disadvantaged setting in sub-Saharan Africa","volume":"2017","author":"Sama","year":"2017","journal-title":"Case Rep Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1067\/j.cpsurg.2014.06.001","article-title":"Necrotizing soft tissue infections: review and current concepts in treatment, systems of care, and outcomes","volume":"51","author":"Hakkarainen","year":"2014","journal-title":"Curr Probl Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib43","first-page":"55","article-title":"Potential future applications for negative pressure wound therapy and installation devices","volume":"30","author":"Falola","year":"2016","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib44","first-page":"321","article-title":"A\u00a0randomized comparison of secondary closure and secondary intention in patients with superficial wound dehiscence","volume":"80","author":"Dodson","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000171114.75338.06","article-title":"Reclosure of the disrupted laparotomy wound: a systematic review","volume":"106","author":"Wechter","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib46","first-page":"317","article-title":"Operative management of abdominal wound dehiscence: outcomes and factors influencing time to healing in patients undergoing surgical debridement with primary closure","volume":"30","author":"Tilt","year":"2018","journal-title":"Wounds"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1186\/s13756-017-0202-3","article-title":"Patient engagement with surgical site infection prevention: an expert panel perspective","volume":"6","author":"Tartari","year":"2017","journal-title":"Antimicrob Resist Infect Control"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S98876","article-title":"Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges","volume":"9","author":"Zuarez-Easton","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1086\/655435","article-title":"Comparison of costs of surgical site infection and endometritis after cesarean section using claims and medical record data","volume":"31","author":"Olsen","year":"2010","journal-title":"Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854520300334?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854520300334?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T10:18:02Z","timestamp":1760177882000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0889854520300334"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0889854520300334"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0889-8545"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0889-8545","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Reducing Cesarean Delivery Surgical Site Complications","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2020.04.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}