{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,12]],"date-time":"2025-11-12T03:30:40Z","timestamp":1762918240893,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,1]],"date-time":"2021-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1622505600000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","theclinics.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,7]],"date-time":"2021-05-07T23:01:14Z","timestamp":1620428474000},"page":"359-369","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Routine Third Trimester Sonogram"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"48","author":[{"given":"Katie","family":"Stephens","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alexandros","family":"Moraitis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gordon C.S.","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"year":"2014","series-title":"RCOG green-top guideline No. 31: the investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age-fetus","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib1"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib2","article-title":"Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24\u00a0weeks' gestation)","author":"Bricker","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100242","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2020.100242","article-title":"Routine third-trimester ultrasound in low-risk pregnancies and perinatal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"2","author":"Al-Hafez","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynaecol MFM"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib4","article-title":"A\u00a0critical review of the Cochrane meta-analysis of routine late-pregnancy ultrasound","author":"Smith","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib5","article-title":"Risk factors for adverse outcomes in vaginal preterm breech labor","author":"Toijonen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91347-D","article-title":"The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study","volume":"166","author":"Hickok","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1002778","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002778","article-title":"Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis","volume":"16","author":"Wastlund","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"9239","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib9","article-title":"Management breech presentation","volume":"124","author":"Impey","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"7568","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38919.681563.4F","article-title":"Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for detection of non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy: cross sectional analytic study","volume":"333","author":"Nassar","year":"2006","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib11","first-page":"294","article-title":"Antepartum identification of breech presentation","volume":"49","author":"Watson","year":"2004","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib12","article-title":"Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.1032002","article-title":"Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?","volume":"170","author":"Hannah","year":"2004","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"issue":"9774","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)62233-7","article-title":"Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"377","author":"Flenady","year":"2011","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib15","article-title":"Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies","volume":"6","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.05.008","article-title":"The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study","volume":"211","author":"Flood","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15729","article-title":"Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss","volume":"47","author":"Khalil","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-020-0854-y","article-title":"Oligohydramnios: a prospective study of fetal, neonatal and maternal outcomes in low-middle income countries","volume":"17","author":"Figueroa","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","article-title":"Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib20","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","volume":"5","author":"Middleton","year":"2018","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"10008","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)00131-2","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study","volume":"386","author":"Sovio","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","article-title":"Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure","volume":"48","author":"Gordijn","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib23","article-title":"Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy","author":"Alfirevic","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib24","article-title":"A\u00a0systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the case for screening nulliparous women in late pregnancy using ultrasound","author":"Smith","year":"2019","journal-title":"HTA J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.149","article-title":"Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses","volume":"22","author":"Baschat","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17491","article-title":"Universal vs selective ultrasonography to screen for large-for-gestational-age infants and associated morbidity","volume":"51","author":"Sovio","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000227","article-title":"Shoulder dystocia: incidence and risk factors","volume":"59","author":"Ouzounian","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.11.983","article-title":"94: Accuracy of prenatal detection of macrosomia\u00a0>4,000g and outcomes in the absence of intervention: results of the prospective multicenter genesis study","volume":"216","author":"Galvin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9987","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61904-8","article-title":"Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"385","author":"Boulvain","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13148","article-title":"Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study","volume":"122","author":"Monier","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.06.065","article-title":"Estimated fetal weight by ultrasound: a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery?","volume":"207","author":"Little","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib32","first-page":"17","article-title":"Ultrasonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia. Association with cesarean delivery","volume":"45","author":"Parry","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.01.004","article-title":"Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort","volume":"215","author":"Manuck","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9608","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(08)60136-1","article-title":"An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood","volume":"371","author":"Saigal","year":"2008","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000289","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000289","article-title":"Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 schoolchildren","volume":"7","author":"MacKay","year":"2010","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2445","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.6235","article-title":"Defining \"term\" pregnancy: recommendations from the defining \"Term\" Pregnancy Workgroup","volume":"309","author":"Spong","year":"2013","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib37","article-title":"Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants","volume":"5","author":"Heazell","year":"2019","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-020-0804-9","article-title":"A\u00a0maternal serum metabolite ratio predicts fetal growth restriction at term","volume":"26","author":"Sovio","year":"2020","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"2S","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.12.002","article-title":"Screening for fetal growth restriction using fetal biometry combined with maternal biomarkers","volume":"218","author":"Gaccioli","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"year":"2015","series-title":"MBRRACE-UK Perinatal confidential enquiry: term, singleton, normally formed, antepartum stillbirth","author":"Draper","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib40"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"274","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000388","article-title":"Birth weight percentile and the risk of term perinatal death","volume":"124","author":"Moraitis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10019","key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)01020-X","article-title":"Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries","volume":"387","author":"Flenady","year":"2016","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006_bib43","article-title":"Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile","author":"Sovio","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854521000188?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0889854521000188?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T10:19:34Z","timestamp":1760177974000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0889854521000188"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0889854521000188"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006","relation":{},"ISSN":["0889-8545"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0889-8545"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Routine Third Trimester Sonogram","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ogc.2021.02.006","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}