{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T04:11:42Z","timestamp":1792210302053,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004726","name":"Ministry of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004726","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["aaojournal.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,14]],"date-time":"2018-08-14T00:00:11Z","timestamp":1534204811000},"page":"242-251","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":58,"title":["A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"126","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9148-2804","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giovanni","family":"Montesano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Susan R.","family":"Bryan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David P.","family":"Crabb","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8183-5365","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paolo","family":"Fogagnolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2504-0004","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Francesco","family":"Oddone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1972-1222","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Allison M.","family":"McKendrick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2559-8769","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrew","family":"Turpin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3746-141X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paolo","family":"Lanzetta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Perdicchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0090-630X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chris A.","family":"Johnson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David F.","family":"Garway-Heath","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paolo","family":"Brusini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luca M.","family":"Rossetti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003996","article-title":"A\u00a0qualitative investigation into patients\u2019 views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring","volume":"4","author":"Glen","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2004.06.019","article-title":"Fixation stability using central and pericentral fixation targets in patients with age-related macular degeneration","volume":"111","author":"Bellmann","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000153","article-title":"Introduction to microperimetry and its use in analysis of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration","volume":"26","author":"Hanout","year":"2015","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0122157","article-title":"Compass: clinical evaluation of a new instrument for the diagnosis of glaucoma","volume":"10","author":"Rossetti","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5000821","article-title":"Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects","volume":"26","author":"Fogagnolo","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012799","article-title":"STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration","volume":"6","author":"Cohen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.12208","article-title":"Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach","volume":"35","author":"Fidalgo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01161.x","article-title":"An automatic static perimeter, design and pilot study","volume":"53","author":"Heijl","year":"1975","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4787","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.03-0023","article-title":"Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation","volume":"44","author":"Turpin","year":"2003","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"885","DOI":"10.1016\/0042-6989(94)90039-6","article-title":"Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation","volume":"34","author":"King-Smith","year":"1994","journal-title":"Vision Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6694","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-11185","article-title":"Robust and censored modeling and prediction of progression in glaucomatous visual fields","volume":"54","author":"Bryan","year":"2013","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.08-3354","article-title":"Estimating normative limits of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc rim area with quantile regression","volume":"51","author":"Artes","year":"2010","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1544","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1987.01060110090039","article-title":"Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field","volume":"105","author":"Heijl","year":"1987","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2105-12-77","article-title":"pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves","volume":"12","author":"Robin","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMC Bioinformatics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1288","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e31822b3746","article-title":"Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects","volume":"88","author":"Acton","year":"2011","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(89)90006-8","article-title":"Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields","volume":"108","author":"Heijl","year":"1989","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.97","article-title":"Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma","volume":"15","author":"Brusini","year":"2006","journal-title":"J\u00a0Glaucoma"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.1989.01070010083032","article-title":"The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects","volume":"107","author":"Heijl","year":"1989","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib19","first-page":"1083","article-title":"Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients","volume":"30","author":"Werner","year":"1989","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib20","first-page":"2006","article-title":"Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry","volume":"41","author":"Kutzko","year":"2000","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.1990.tb01694.x","article-title":"Factors associated with a learning effect in glaucoma patients using automated perimetry","volume":"68","author":"Kulze","year":"1990","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.5.2.7","article-title":"Incorporating spatial models in visual field test procedures","volume":"5","author":"Rubinstein","year":"2016","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0420.1998.760208.x","article-title":"Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm","volume":"76","author":"Bengtsson","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib24","first-page":"2654","article-title":"Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies","volume":"43","author":"Artes","year":"2002","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5985","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-10428","article-title":"The relationship between variability and sensitivity in large-scale longitudinal visual field data","volume":"53","author":"Russell","year":"2012","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.01.020","article-title":"Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage","volume":"121","author":"Gardiner","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5631","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.16-20053","article-title":"Effect of restricting perimetry testing algorithms to reliable sensitivities on test-retest variability","volume":"57","author":"Gardiner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.6.4.11","article-title":"Reducing variability of perimetric global indices from eyes with progressive glaucoma by censoring unreliable sensitivity data","volume":"6","author":"Pathak","year":"2017","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.15-18000","article-title":"The effect of limiting the range of perimetric sensitivities on pointwise assessment of visual field progression in glaucoma","volume":"57","author":"Gardiner","year":"2016","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2006.12.012","article-title":"Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity","volume":"47","author":"Wyatt","year":"2007","journal-title":"Vision Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4632","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.05-1598","article-title":"Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm","volume":"47","author":"Newkirk","year":"2006","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"986","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.82.9.986","article-title":"Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology","volume":"82","author":"Garway-Heath","year":"1998","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0161642018309357?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0161642018309357?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,27]],"date-time":"2025-09-27T14:06:25Z","timestamp":1758981985000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0161642018309357"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S0161642018309357"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010","relation":{},"ISSN":["0161-6420"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0161-6420","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Ophthalmology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.08.010","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}