{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,14]],"date-time":"2026-09-14T16:05:43Z","timestamp":1789401943620,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1696118400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,25]],"date-time":"2023-05-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684972800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.es","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Optometry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,9]],"date-time":"2023-08-09T08:20:27Z","timestamp":1691569227000},"page":"284-295","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in the different quality measurements"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8270-9704","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Masoud","family":"Khorrami-Nejad","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ahmed Mohammed","family":"Khodair","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mehdi","family":"Khodaparast","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Farshid","family":"Babapour Mofrad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Farzaneh","family":"Dehghanian Nasrabadi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.21037\/atm-20-2290","article-title":"Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods-update 2020","volume":"8","author":"Savini","year":"2020","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0002","first-page":"18","article-title":"Ultrasound and optical biometry","volume":"2009","author":"Holladay","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cataract Refract Surg Today Eur"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000822","article-title":"Advancements in intraocular lens power calculation formulas","volume":"33","author":"Chung","year":"2022","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doctor K., Shanbhag N., Karandikar S. IOL calculations: when, how and which. Mastering the techniques of IOL power calculations India: JAYPEE. 2009:36\u201345.","DOI":"10.5005\/jp\/books\/10503_9"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.07.041","article-title":"Intraocular lens exchange due to incorrect lens power","volume":"114","author":"GJ","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x","article-title":"Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review","volume":"85","author":"Olsen","year":"2007","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0420.2003.00092.x","article-title":"Comparison of laser interferometry and ultrasound A-scan in the measurement of axial length","volume":"81","author":"Goyal","year":"2003","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0008","first-page":"23","article-title":"Ocular ultrasound for evaluation of eye diseases among hypertensive patients with long term of diabetes","volume":"19","author":"Bashir","year":"2020","journal-title":"IOSR J Dental Med Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.msard.2019.101434","article-title":"A-scan ultrasonography as a supportive diagnostic tool in case of acute optic neuritis","volume":"36","author":"De Bernardo","year":"2019","journal-title":"Mult Scler Relat Disord"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1475-1313.2001.00611.x","article-title":"The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements from the IOLMaster","volume":"21","author":"Lam","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ophthal Physiol Opt"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2015-307779","article-title":"Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500","volume":"100","author":"Akman","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1961","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(01)01214-7","article-title":"Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability","volume":"27","author":"Vogel","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1442-9071.2003.00617.x","article-title":"Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation","volume":"31","author":"Rose","year":"2003","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1097\/ICL.0000000000000552","article-title":"An evaluation of the IOLMaster 700","volume":"45","author":"Bullimore","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eye Contact Lens"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0420.2005.00473.x","article-title":"The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster","volume":"83","author":"Freeman","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2006.01.101","article-title":"Influence of severity of nuclear cataract on optical biometry","volume":"32","author":"Prinz","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20170721-05","article-title":"Accuracy of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer for IOL power calculation and comparison to IOLMaster","volume":"33","author":"Savini","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0018","first-page":"1318","article-title":"Signal-to-noise ratio comparisons between spectral-domain and swept-source OCTs","volume":"58","author":"Huang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.04.007","article-title":"Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers","volume":"120","author":"Grulkowski","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0217584","article-title":"The influence of low signal-to-noise ratio of axial length measurement on prediction of target refraction, achieved using IOLMaster","volume":"14","author":"Ryu","year":"2019","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2062","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.07.031","article-title":"Influence of the signal-to-noise ratio on the accuracy of IOLMaster measurements","volume":"33","author":"Suto","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1757","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S170301","article-title":"Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio","volume":"12","author":"Chia","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clinic Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.18240\/ijo.2021.07.08","article-title":"Comparison of IOL-Master 700 and IOL-Master 500 biometers in ocular biological parameters of adolescents","volume":"14","author":"Shi","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2017.0091","article-title":"Comparison of ocular biometry using new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer with other devices","volume":"32","author":"Cho","year":"2018","journal-title":"Korean J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/8946364","article-title":"Reliability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer in healthy children, adults, and cataract patients","volume":"2020","author":"Huang","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.exer.2021.108578","article-title":"Comparison of A-Scan ultrasonography and the Lenstar optical biometer in Guinea pig eyes","volume":"207","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"Exp Eye Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0027","first-page":"3","article-title":"Comparison of optical and ultrasound biometry and assessment of using both methods in practice","volume":"70","author":"Cech","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sjopt.2014.04.003","article-title":"Comparison of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound measurements of the axial length of the eye","volume":"28","author":"Nakhli","year":"2014","journal-title":"Saudi J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0029","article-title":"Comparison of 2 modern swept-source optical biometers-IOLMaster 700 and Anterion","author":"Langenbucher","year":"2022","journal-title":"Graefe's Arch Clinic Exp Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2913","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-020-01475-5","article-title":"Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement by scanning slit topography, infrared, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes","volume":"40","author":"Ho","year":"2020","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/481238","article-title":"Comparison of optical versus ultrasonic biometry in keratoconic eyes","author":"\u00c7\u0131nar","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e31821cc4d6","article-title":"Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population","volume":"88","author":"Gursoy","year":"2011","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2009.02091.x","article-title":"Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry","volume":"37","author":"Landers","year":"2009","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1950","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(03)00243-8","article-title":"Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery","volume":"29","author":"Findl","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2014.08.014","article-title":"Overview of the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of the biometry values provided by various ophthalmic devices","volume":"158","author":"Rozema","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0036","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of accuracy of immersion a-scan ultrasound biometry and optical biometry in cases undergoing small incision cataract surgery","volume":"13","author":"Joshi","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Clinic Diagn Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0037","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.03.019","article-title":"Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography\u2013based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography\u2013based optical biometer","volume":"41","author":"Srivannaboon","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.07.013","article-title":"Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry","volume":"42","author":"Hoffer","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.02.027","article-title":"Comparison of axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth measurements of 2 recently introduced devices to a known biometer","volume":"178","author":"Shajari","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.08.064","article-title":"Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes","volume":"39","author":"Shen","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0041","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-010-1509-4","article-title":"Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation","volume":"249","author":"Ron\u010devi\u0107","year":"2011","journal-title":"Graefe's Arch Clinic Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1757","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S170301","article-title":"Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio","volume":"12","author":"Chia","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clinic Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Optometry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1888429623000171?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1888429623000171?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T11:13:39Z","timestamp":1761822819000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1888429623000171"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S1888429623000171"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["1888-4296"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1888-4296","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in the different quality measurements","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Journal of Optometry","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.optom.2023.05.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espa\u00f1a, S.L.U.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}