{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,12]],"date-time":"2026-06-12T16:08:56Z","timestamp":1781280536265,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780272000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780272000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,15]],"date-time":"2026-01-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768435200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009702","name":"Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009702","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["International Orthodontics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T10:22:06Z","timestamp":1770027726000},"page":"101142","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"special_numbering":"S","title":["Validating conventional 2D IMPA against 3D one: is it still a trustworthy angle? A retrospective CBCT-based diagnostic agreement study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Marco","family":"Serafin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elisa","family":"Boccalari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luca","family":"Fracci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alberto","family":"Caprioglio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s13005-023-00361-6","article-title":"Inclination of mandibular incisors and symphysis in severe skeletal class III malocclusion","volume":"19","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Head Face Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-025-06751-3","article-title":"Is there really a relationship between maxillary and mandibular incisor inclination and the amount of surrounding cortical alveolar bone? A systematic review","volume":"25","author":"d\u2019Oliveira","year":"2025","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1567","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-017-2255-3","article-title":"Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a CBCT study","volume":"22","author":"Srebrzy\u0144ska-Witek","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm11080692","article-title":"Personalized orthodontics: from the sagittal position of lower incisors to the facial profile esthetics","volume":"11","author":"Derwich","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3159","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics12123159","article-title":"The accuracy of lateral cephalogram for measuring alveolar bone thickness and root diameter on mandibular incisors","volume":"12","author":"Limsakul","year":"2022","journal-title":"Diagnostics (Basel)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjv027","article-title":"Assessing lower incisor inclination change: a comparison of four cephalometric methods","volume":"38","author":"Jabbal","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1038\/s41415-024-7781-1","article-title":"The role of orthodontics in the prevention and management of gingival recession","volume":"237","author":"Fleming","year":"2024","journal-title":"Br Dent J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/12615645","article-title":"The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics","volume":"40","author":"Kapila","year":"2011","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1625","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-021-04135-9","article-title":"Orthodontists\u2019 criteria for prescribing cone-beam computed tomography\u00a0\u2014\u00a0a multi-country survey","volume":"26","author":"Caiado","year":"2022","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1177\/14653125231178038","article-title":"Accuracy of conventional versus cone-beam CT-synthesised lateral cephalograms for cephalometric analysis: a systematic review","volume":"51","author":"Raj","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.2319\/082907-399.1","article-title":"In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms","volume":"78","author":"Kumar","year":"2008","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.5624\/isd.2012.42.4.201","article-title":"Comparison of conventional lateral cephalograms with corresponding CBCT radiographs","volume":"42","author":"Park","year":"2012","journal-title":"Imaging Sci Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20585","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-25215-0","article-title":"Effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms using artificial intelligence cephalometric analysis","volume":"12","author":"Chung","year":"2022","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.4103\/tdj.tdj_19_24","article-title":"Comparison of conventional and cone beam computed tomography synthetized cephalograms in evaluating different skeletal patterns","volume":"21","author":"El Tantawy Nour AETSA","year":"2024","journal-title":"Tanta Dent J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.2319\/032210-166.1","article-title":"Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans","volume":"81","author":"Gribel","year":"2011","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2008.12.018","article-title":"Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs. conventional cephalometric views","volume":"136","author":"Ludlow","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1007\/s11547-017-0748-4","article-title":"Evaluation of the influence of patient positioning on the reliability of lateral cephalometry","volume":"122","author":"David","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiol Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1067\/mod.2002.125565","article-title":"Effect of magnification on lateral cephalometric studies","volume":"122","author":"Dibbets","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.2319\/080219-510.1","article-title":"A cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of alveolar bone dimensional changes and the periodontal limits of mandibular incisor advancement in skeletal Class II patients","volume":"90","author":"Matsumoto","year":"2020","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.07.013","article-title":"Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations","volume":"137","author":"Leung","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.4103\/njcp.njcp_90_17","article-title":"Three-dimensional evaluation of alveolar bone thickness of mandibular anterior teeth in different dentofacial types","volume":"21","author":"Eraydin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1590\/2177-6709.23.1.054-062.oar","article-title":"Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness as assessed with cone-beam computed tomography","volume":"23","author":"Foosiri","year":"2018","journal-title":"Dental Press J Orthod"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20140197","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20140197","article-title":"Effective dose of dental CBCT\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a meta-analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units","volume":"44","author":"Ludlow","year":"2015","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.5624\/isd.20250013","article-title":"Accuracy of facial scan registration: a comparison between full-cranium and reduced field-of-view cone-beam computed tomography","volume":"55","author":"Serafin","year":"2025","journal-title":"Imaging Sci Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oooo.2013.06.002","article-title":"Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic treatment. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology","volume":"116","author":"Scarfe","year":"2013","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol"}],"container-title":["International Orthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1761722726000033?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1761722726000033?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,12]],"date-time":"2026-06-12T15:49:41Z","timestamp":1781279381000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1761722726000033"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S1761722726000033"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142","relation":{},"ISSN":["1761-7227"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1761-7227","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Validating conventional 2D IMPA against 3D one: is it still a trustworthy angle? A retrospective CBCT-based diagnostic agreement study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"International Orthodontics","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ortho.2026.101142","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of CEO.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"101142"}}