{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,10]],"date-time":"2026-04-10T02:55:02Z","timestamp":1775789702965,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,17]],"date-time":"2016-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1463443200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4460,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Otolaryngol.--head neck surg."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>OBJECTIVES<\/jats:title><jats:p>The objective of this study was to compare the safety, difficulty of removal, and postoperative pain profile of radiofrequency ablation versus standard electrocautery removal of tonsils.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING<\/jats:title><jats:p>A prospective, blinded study was designed to remove 1 tonsil with each of the 2\u00a0methods. Time of operation, estimated blood loss, difficulty of operation, postoperative pain, rate of postoperative hemorrhage, and the patient's preferred technique were evaluated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title><jats:p>The operating time was significantly longer (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.007) and the patients reported significantly less pain (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) with radiofrequency ablation. There were no differences in blood loss, difficulty of operation, or postoperative hemorrhage rates. The patients preferred the radiofrequency ablation technique (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSION<\/jats:title><jats:p>Radiofrequency ablation is a viable method to remove tonsillar tissue. Operating time for this procedure will likely decrease with experience. There was significantly less pain reported with radiofrequency ablation compared with standard electrocautery. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:300\u20135.)<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.09.024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,4,9]],"date-time":"2004-04-09T05:21:57Z","timestamp":1081488117000},"page":"300-305","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Radiofrequency Ablation versus Electrocautery in Tonsillectomy"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"130","author":[{"given":"Daniel J.","family":"Hall","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology\u2014Head and Neck Surgery Tripler Army Medical Center Honolulu Hawaii"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Philip D.","family":"Littlefield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology\u2014Head and Neck Surgery Tripler Army Medical Center Honolulu Hawaii"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Deborah P.","family":"Birkmire\u2010Peters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology\u2014Head and Neck Surgery Tripler Army Medical Center Honolulu Hawaii"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Capt Michael R.","family":"Holtel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otolaryngology\u2014Head and Neck Surgery Tripler Army Medical Center Honolulu Hawaii"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mhn.2002.129736"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-5876(00)00293-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mhn.2000.109758"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-5876(01)00553-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/0022215021911031"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.127.9.1106"}],"container-title":["Otolaryngology\u2013Head and Neck Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.09.024","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.09.024","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.09.024","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T10:47:42Z","timestamp":1760957262000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.09.024"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,3]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.09.024"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2003.09.024","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0194-5998","1097-6817"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0194-5998","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-6817","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2016-05-17","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}