{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,13]],"date-time":"2026-03-13T21:06:54Z","timestamp":1773436014410,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,17]],"date-time":"2016-05-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1463443200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":3181,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Otolaryngol.--head neck surg."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>OBJECTIVE<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the quality of perceived sound in relation to the audiometric result after stapedotomy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>STUDY DESIGN<\/jats:title><jats:p>Ninety\u2010eight patients with otosclerosis, who underwent stapedotomy between 2004 and 2005, participated in this retrospective study. Audiometric data were obtained before and after stapedotomy. Patients filled out two questionnaires: the Amsterdam Post Operative Sound Evaluation and the Operation Benefit Profile, which is based on the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title><jats:p>There were 83 responders and 15\u00a0nonresponders; 83% indicated that their hearing was now better compared to preoperatively. The sounds that gave the highest percentage of distortion were \u201chigh pitched sound\u201d (15%) and \u201cloud sound\u201d (13%). The groups with an air\u2010bone gap of 0 to 10\u00a0dB and 10 to 20\u00a0dB report a relatively high number of patients who experience distortion. The audiometric data correlate well with the Operation Benefit Score.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title><jats:p>Audiometric improvement does not necessarily mean an improvement in perceived sound and vice versa. But the audiometric outcome is significantly related to the patient's experienced handicap, benefit of the operation, residual difficulty, and overall satisfaction.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otohns.2007.03.038","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,8,31]],"date-time":"2007-08-31T07:14:53Z","timestamp":1188544493000},"page":"443-449","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Quality of Perceived Sound after Stapedotomy"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"137","author":[{"given":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique M.L.","family":"Tan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otorhinolaryngology\u2013Head and Neck Surgery Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wilko","family":"Grolman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otorhinolaryngology\u2013Head and Neck Surgery Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rinze A.","family":"Tange","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otorhinolaryngology\u2013Head and Neck Surgery Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wytske J.","family":"Fokkens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Otorhinolaryngology\u2013Head and Neck Surgery Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,5,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_10_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/000348945806700403"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016489950180982"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2310\/7070.2003.11435"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/000348940511400609"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mhn.2000.110364"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/014556130007901108"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0709(97)90044-2"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_2_10_9_1","first-page":"424","article-title":"A self\u2010report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services","volume":"57","author":"Gatehouse S","year":"1999","journal-title":"Health Bull (Edinb)"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_10_10_1","first-page":"63","article-title":"Stapedotomy\u201d technique and results","volume":"6","author":"Marquet J","year":"1985","journal-title":"Am J Otol"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0194-5998(95)70103-6"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_10_12_1","first-page":"521","article-title":"Reporting operative hearing results in stapes surgery: Does choice of outcome measure make a difference?","volume":"17","author":"Berliner KI","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Otol"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00129492-200311000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/000348949410301204"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005537-200111000-00036"},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_2_10_16_1","first-page":"573","article-title":"Comparison of stapes pros\u2010theses: A retrospective analysis of individual audiometric results obtained after stapedotomy by implantation of a gold and a teflon piston","volume":"20","author":"Bruijn AJ","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Otol"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mao.0000172414.64907.9d"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.305.6854.645-b"}],"container-title":["Otolaryngology\u2013Head and Neck Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2007.03.038","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2007.03.038","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2007.03.038","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T14:11:35Z","timestamp":1760969495000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2007.03.038"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.otohns.2007.03.038"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otohns.2007.03.038","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0194-5998","1097-6817"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0194-5998","type":"print"},{"value":"1097-6817","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2006-12-05","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2007-03-23","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2016-05-17","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}