{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,12]],"date-time":"2026-02-12T07:59:41Z","timestamp":1770883181339,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,1]],"date-time":"2017-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1485907200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,1]],"date-time":"2017-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1485907200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,1]],"date-time":"2018-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1517443200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":365,"URL":"http:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/open-access\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,24]],"date-time":"2016-11-24T18:16:32Z","timestamp":1480011392000},"page":"45-51","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Minimum four-year subsequent surgery rates of cervical disc replacement versus fusion: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"103","author":[{"given":"T.K.","family":"Wu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"B.Y.","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Y.","family":"Meng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000044","article-title":"Comparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009","volume":"39","author":"Nandyala","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"971","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.05.042","article-title":"Rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after initial posterior cervical foraminotomy","volume":"15","author":"Wang","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E907","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Phillips","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181dc9b51","article-title":"Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"36","author":"Quan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1986","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318133fb99","article-title":"Modified techniques to prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty","volume":"32","author":"Yi","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318278eb38","article-title":"ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration Study","volume":"38","author":"Zigler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-3098-7","article-title":"Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"40","author":"Lei","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2014.05.007","article-title":"Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"21","author":"Tracey","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13996","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Burkus","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3181bb8568","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up","volume":"23","author":"Garrido","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E237","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000185","article-title":"Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical total disk replacement versus anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up","volume":"28","author":"Hisey","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2010.02.007","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"8","author":"Moher","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1929","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f","article-title":"2009 Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane back review group","volume":"34","author":"Furlan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.9.SPINE12555","article-title":"Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site","volume":"18","author":"Coric","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0230","first-page":"1","article-title":"Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up","author":"Jackson","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1738","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.01186","article-title":"ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study","volume":"97","author":"Janssen","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"674","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000869","article-title":"Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pcm cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion","volume":"40","author":"Phillips","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1684","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00476","article-title":"Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial","volume":"93","author":"Sasso","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2533","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-014-2497-5","article-title":"A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion","volume":"38","author":"Zhang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E624","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182413930","article-title":"Cervical myelopathy after cervical total disc arthroplasty: case report and literature review","volume":"37","author":"Chen","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1974-4","article-title":"Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation","volume":"21","author":"Barrey","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.7.SPINE13953","article-title":"Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results","volume":"22","author":"Davis","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurosur Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.02.039","article-title":"The Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy\u00a0\u2013\u00a0a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2-year follow-up","volume":"15","author":"Skeppholm","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2933","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815d0034","article-title":"Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients","volume":"32","author":"Sasso","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3220-3","article-title":"Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"23","author":"Ren","year":"2014","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822699fa","article-title":"Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China","volume":"37","author":"Zhang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182797592","article-title":"Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Delamarter","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e0117826","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0117826","article-title":"Cervical total disc replacement is superior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials","volume":"10","author":"Zhang","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2431","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200211150-00003","article-title":"Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion","volume":"27","author":"Eck","year":"2002","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E9","DOI":"10.3171\/foc.2004.17.3.9","article-title":"Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty","volume":"17","author":"Duggal","year":"2004","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31828ce774","article-title":"Reoperations in cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical fusion: results compiled from multiple prospective food and drug administration investigational device exemption trials conducted at a single site","volume":"38","author":"Blumenthal","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"}],"container-title":["Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877056816302195?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877056816302195?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T03:34:43Z","timestamp":1761795283000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1877056816302195"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S1877056816302195"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["1877-0568"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1877-0568","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Minimum four-year subsequent surgery rates of cervical disc replacement versus fusion: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.10.008","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}