{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,23]],"date-time":"2026-08-23T17:14:05Z","timestamp":1787505245620,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":95,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,1]],"date-time":"2025-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756684800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Orthopaedics &amp; Traumatology: Surgery &amp; Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,13]],"date-time":"2024-12-13T11:48:23Z","timestamp":1734090503000},"page":"104110","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems \u2013 how should we treat these? A systematic scoping review and algorithm for management"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"111","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1158-238X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benjamin","family":"Schapira","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suroosh","family":"Madanipour","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Padmanabhan","family":"Subramanian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2015.11.038","article-title":"Survivorship after periprosthetic femur fracture: factors affecting outcome","volume":"31","author":"Drew","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10225288","article-title":"Is stem revision necessary for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures? Analysis of osteosynthesis results from 39 cases","volume":"10","author":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Mart\u00edn","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2021.102985","article-title":"Assessment of morbidity and mortality after periprosthetic hip fracture. Influence of Vancouver stage in a retrospective single-centre study of 88 patients","volume":"108","author":"Francony","year":"2022","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0020","series-title":"National Joint Registry for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0025","series-title":"National Joint Registry","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0030","series-title":"The Swedish Arthroplasty Register","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0035","unstructured":"Second American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Data. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014. https:\/\/www.aaos.org\/registries\/publications\/ajrr-annual-report\/. Date last accessed 21\/09\/2024."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0040","unstructured":"The Ninth Annual Report of the American Joint Replacement Registry on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022. https:\/\/www.aaos.org\/registries\/publications\/ajrr-annual-report\/. Date last accessed 21\/09\/2024."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B8.35170","article-title":"The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales. A comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset","volume":"97-B","author":"Patel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0050","first-page":"293","article-title":"Fractures of the femur after hip replacement","author":"Duncan","year":"1995","journal-title":"Instr Course Lect"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B6.34040","article-title":"The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures","volume":"96","author":"Duncan","year":"2014","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1177\/11207000211017115","article-title":"Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total Hip arthroplasty: results of an online survey of the European Hip Society","volume":"33","author":"Thaler","year":"2023","journal-title":"Hip Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.105B5.BJJ-2022-1395.R1","article-title":"Which Unified Classification System type B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished tapered stems should not be fixed?","volume":"105-B","author":"Scott","year":"2023","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0163.R1","article-title":"B2 or not B2? That is the question: a review of periprosthetic fractures around cemented taper-slip femoral components","volume":"103-B","author":"Maggs","year":"2021","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0075","article-title":"A national review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England. Getting It Right First Time","author":"Briggs","year":"2015","journal-title":"Br Orthop Assoc"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0080","unstructured":"Annual Report. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 2023. Date last accessed 21\/09\/2024). https:\/\/aoanjrr.sahmri.com\/documents\/10180\/1579982\/AOA_NJRR_AR23.pdf\/c3bcc83b-5590-e034-4ad8-802e4ad8bf5b?t=1695887126627."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-016-1883-7","article-title":"Principles of managing Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished tapered femoral stems","volume":"27","author":"Quah","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.11.003","article-title":"Polished, collarless, tapered, cemented stems for primary hip arthroplasty may exhibit high rate of periprosthetic fracture at short-term follow-up","volume":"33","author":"Scott","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1447","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0480.R2","article-title":"Surgical treatment of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fracture. Patient characteristics and outcomes of 1381 fractures treated in Sweden between 2001 and 2011","volume":"101-B","author":"Chatziagorou","year":"2019","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1","article-title":"Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them. What is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?","volume":"99-B","author":"Carli","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2019.1624339","article-title":"Reduced periprosthetic fracture rate when changing from a tapered polished stem to an anatomical stem for cemented hip arthroplasty: an observational prospective cohort study with a follow-up of 2 years","volume":"90","author":"Mohammed","year":"2019","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1347","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B10.36534","article-title":"The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty. An analysis of National Joint Registry data","volume":"98-B","author":"Palan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"100","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0115","article-title":"Periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures in cemented and uncemented stems according to Vancouver classification: observation of a new fracture pattern","volume":"15","author":"Karam","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4075","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04302-3","article-title":"Post-operative peri-prosthetic fracture rates following the use of cemented polished taper-slip stems for primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review","volume":"142","author":"Baryeh","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-022-02032-8","article-title":"Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"49","author":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Mart\u00edn","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1311.R1","article-title":"A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures","volume":"99-B","author":"Khan","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.21.00008","article-title":"Revision arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation of Vancouver Type-B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures","volume":"9","author":"Haider","year":"2021","journal-title":"JBJS Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000002148","article-title":"Management of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, revision total hip arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"36","author":"Lewis","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1381","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-020-03332-7","article-title":"Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review","volume":"140","author":"Stoffel","year":"2020","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.6.200050","article-title":"Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes","volume":"6","author":"Patsiogiannis","year":"2021","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2018.12.001","article-title":"Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: a review of biomechanical testing \u2013 Part II","volume":"61","author":"Wang","year":"2019","journal-title":"Clin Biomech"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.12884","article-title":"Is internal fixation alone advantageous in selected B2 periprosthetic fractures?","volume":"85","author":"Solomon","year":"2015","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2021.10.026","article-title":"New sub-classification of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures according to fracture pattern","volume":"53","author":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Mart\u00edn","year":"2022","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jor.2022.03.008","article-title":"Cement-in-cement versus uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures","volume":"31","author":"Kennedy","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Orthop"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-03776-5","article-title":"Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years","volume":"142","author":"Klasan","year":"2022","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-024-05223-7","article-title":"Analysis of complications in 97 periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fractures treated either by internal fixation or revision arthroplasty","volume":"144","author":"Eckardt","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0695.R1","article-title":"Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures involving the Exeter cemented stem reducible fractures with intact bone-cement interfaces can be fixed","volume":"103-B","author":"Powell-Bowns","year":"2021","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0190","article-title":"Factors associated with failure of fixation of Vancouver B fractures around a cemented polished tapered stem: a 5 to 14 year follow up study","volume":"S0020-1383","author":"Powell-Bowns","year":"2023","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1430","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.03.003","article-title":"Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures in cemented femoral implants can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation alone without revision","volume":"34","author":"Smitham","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-018-2181-3","article-title":"Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate","volume":"28","author":"Spina","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0205","first-page":"536","article-title":"Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty Vancouver type B","volume":"56","author":"Bulatovi\u0107","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Clin Croat"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-012-1024-x","article-title":"Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis","volume":"23","author":"Canbora","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2024.101467","article-title":"Early postoperative functional recovery in older patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures: comparison between cemented and cementless stem revisions","volume":"28","author":"Ueyama","year":"2024","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-020-03410-w","article-title":"Union rate, complication rate, and opioid usage after Vancouver B periprosthetic femur fractures: a comparison of fracture types","volume":"141","author":"Malige","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0225","unstructured":"Patient characteristics for revision hip replacement procedures. National Joint Registry. 2021. https:\/\/reports.njrcentre.org.uk\/hips-revision-procedures-patient-characteristics\/H19v1NJR?reportid=AB5D4468-323C-4E54-8737-11C7DAA7B75E&defaults=DC__Reporting_Period__Date_Range=%22MAX%22,J__Filter__Calendar_Year=%22MAX%22,H__Filter__Joint=%22Hip%22. Date last accessed 21\/09\/2024."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2014.03.030","article-title":"Revision of primary total hip arthroplasty for peri-prosthetic fracture: a prospective epidemiological study of 249 consecutive cases in France","volume":"100","author":"Ehlinger","year":"2014","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1472","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B11.34214","article-title":"Field testing the Unified Classification System for peri-prosthetic fractures of the pelvis and femur around a total hip replacement. An international collaboration","volume":"96-B","author":"Vioreanu","year":"2014","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-1809.R1","article-title":"Selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished femoral components can be safely treated with osteosynthesis","volume":"103-B","author":"Slullitel","year":"2021","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2151459319876859","article-title":"Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver Type B2: revision arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plate","volume":"10","author":"Baum","year":"2019","journal-title":"Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2007.02.053","article-title":"Classification of femoral periprosthetic fractures","volume":"38","author":"Ninan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.5.190086","article-title":"Periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur: beyond the Vancouver classification","volume":"5","author":"Stoffel","year":"2020","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0260","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1535.R1","article-title":"The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up. The first 540 cases","volume":"100-B","author":"Westerman","year":"2018","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B11.37668","article-title":"The Exeter Universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years. A report of 382 hips","volume":"98-B","author":"Petheram","year":"2016","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2022.103300","article-title":"Comparison of the functional outcomes after treatment of periprosthetic hip fractures with femoral stem loosening: locking plate fixation with or without femoral stem revision","volume":"108","author":"Vialla","year":"2022","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0275","first-page":"81","article-title":"Vancouver type B 2 fractures: best choice of treatment","volume":"4","author":"Guerra-Farf\u00e1n","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Orthop Traumatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-020-03568-3","article-title":"Open reduction and internal fixation might be a valuable alternative to stem revision in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, irrespective of the stem\u2019s design","volume":"141","author":"Flury","year":"2021","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2022-0685.R1","article-title":"A multicentre comparative analysis of fixation versus revision surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with a cemented polished taper-slip femoral component","volume":"105","author":"Jain","year":"2023","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2014.07.013","article-title":"Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty","volume":"46","author":"Moreta","year":"2015","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jor.2018.01.006","article-title":"Periprosthetic hip fractures: a review of the economic burden based on length of stay","volume":"15","author":"Lyons","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Orthop"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2011.01.017","article-title":"Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated by locked plating: feasibility assessment of the mini-invasive surgical option. A prospective series of 36 fractures","volume":"97","author":"Ehlinger","year":"2011","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1377","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2018-0489.R1","article-title":"Increased complications in geriatric patients with a fracture of the hip whose postoperative weight-bearing is restricted. An analysis of 4918 patients","volume":"100-B","author":"Ottesen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-1482.R1","article-title":"A call to arms: it\u2019s time to bear weight!","volume":"102-B","author":"Trompeter","year":"2020","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.5371\/hp.2016.28.2.90","article-title":"Could patient undergwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty return to their status before trauma?","volume":"28","author":"Zheng","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hip Pelvis"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2017.07.017","article-title":"Outcomes following osteosynthesis of periprosthetic hip fractures around cemented tapered polished stems","volume":"48","author":"Goudie","year":"2017","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.02.036","article-title":"Cementless, fluted, long-stem hemiarthroplasty for Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures around hip hemiarthroplasty","volume":"34","author":"Lizaur-Utrilla","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0330","article-title":"Subsidence in centraliser sign: a novel tool to help predict early subsidence in periprosthetic femoral fractures around polished tapered stems treated with internal fixation","volume":"15","author":"Madanipour","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jemermed.2020.10.016","article-title":"The Subsidence IN Centralizer (SINC) Sign: a diagnostic indicator to help prevent missed periprosthetic hip fractures","volume":"60","author":"Madanipour","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Emerg Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2017.12.018","article-title":"Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision","volume":"104","author":"Cohen","year":"2018","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0345","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/tsaco-2021-000701","article-title":"Is it a matter of time? The effect of transfer time on femur fracture outcomes","volume":"6","author":"Larson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Trauma Surg Acute Care Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2016.07.022","article-title":"Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures by Distal Locking Femoral Stem (Cannulok) in patients 75 years and older","volume":"32","author":"El-Bakoury","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Arthoplasty"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0355","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-010-1182-6","article-title":"Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures","volume":"35","author":"Mertl","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1683","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-014-2570-0","article-title":"Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome","volume":"39","author":"Inngul","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2016.01.036","article-title":"Locking compression plate versus revision-prosthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty","volume":"47","author":"Joestl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0370","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1989","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2959-4","article-title":"Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures","volume":"39","author":"Haasper","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.08.010","article-title":"Periprosthetic femoral fracture - a biomechanical comparison between vancouver type B1 and B2 fixation methods","volume":"29","author":"Moazen","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Arthoplasty"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B8.34431","article-title":"Revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture using an uncemented modular tapered conical stem","volume":"97-B","author":"Da Assun\u00e7\u00e3o","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200305000-00003","article-title":"Trochanteric osteotomy and fixation during total hip arthroplasty","volume":"11","author":"Archibeck","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1933","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2958-5","article-title":"Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with modular stems","volume":"39","author":"Hernandez-Vaquero","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2021.11.036","article-title":"Mid-term outcomes following transfemoral revision of total hip arthroplasty for Vancouver B2\/B3 periprosthetic fractures","volume":"53","author":"Sch\u00f6fl","year":"2022","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-22-08-482","article-title":"Periprosthetic fractures around loose femoral components","volume":"22","author":"Shah","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1186\/s10195-024-00777-z","article-title":"Comparative outcomes of uncemented and cemented stem revision in managing periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"25","author":"Axenhus","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2011.03.050","article-title":"Results of cemented femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in the elderly","volume":"27","author":"Corten","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.3109\/17453670903316827","article-title":"Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up of 23 cases","volume":"80","author":"Briant-Evans","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artd.2022.101071","article-title":"Open reduction and internal fixation and cement-in-cement revision for selected Vancouver B proximal femur periprosthetic fractures","volume":"19","author":"McCarthy","year":"2023","journal-title":"Arthroplast Today"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S77","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e31821b8c3b","article-title":"Periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: current concepts","volume":"25","author":"Parvizi","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1053\/j.oto.2009.05.006","article-title":"Preoperative planning and surgical technique in the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures using a tapered modular fluted prosthesis with distal fixation","volume":"19","author":"Rodriguez","year":"2009","journal-title":"Oper Tech Orthop"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.102B5.BJJ-2019-1333.R2","article-title":"Mechanical failure of 113 uncemented modular revision femoral components","volume":"102-B","author":"Krueger","year":"2020","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.18.00442","article-title":"Femoral bone remodeling in revision total hip arthroplasty with use of modular compared with monoblock tapered fluted titanium stems: the role of stem length and stiffness","volume":"101","author":"Huang","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0445","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/s10195-023-00731-5","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of modular versus monoblock stems in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"24","author":"Wang","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol"},{"issue":"9S1","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0450","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2024.03.046","article-title":"A consecutive series of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular revision stems: clinical and radiographic outcomes","volume":"39","author":"Siljander","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0455","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2010.12.007","article-title":"Reversed anatomic distal femur locking plate for periprosthetic hip fracture fixation","volume":"97","author":"Ehlinger","year":"2011","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"9-10","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0460","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"988","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2013.09.005","article-title":"Mechanical behavior of fixation components for periprosthetic fracture surgery","volume":"28","author":"Lenz","year":"2013","journal-title":"Clin Biomech"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0465","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000365","article-title":"Tangential Bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: a biomechanical study","volume":"29","author":"Lewis","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0470","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1749","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2787-6","article-title":"Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates","volume":"39","author":"Gwinner","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110_bib0475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2015.01.015","article-title":"Treatment of type B periprosthetic femur fractures with curved non-locking plate with eccentric holes: retrospective study of 43 patients with minimum 1-year follow-up","volume":"101","author":"Lunebourg","year":"2015","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"}],"container-title":["Orthopaedics &amp; Traumatology: Surgery &amp; Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877056824004080?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1877056824004080?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,29]],"date-time":"2025-08-29T01:55:43Z","timestamp":1756432543000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1877056824004080"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"references-count":95,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S1877056824004080"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110","relation":{},"ISSN":["1877-0568"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1877-0568","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems \u2013 how should we treat these? A systematic scoping review and algorithm for management","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2024.104110","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Crown Copyright \u00a9 2024 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"104110"}}