{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,14]],"date-time":"2026-07-14T23:36:37Z","timestamp":1784072197723,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":88,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,1]],"date-time":"2022-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1651363200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,27]],"date-time":"2022-02-27T17:13:55Z","timestamp":1645982035000},"page":"84-92","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Prosthesis-patient mismatch following aortic and mitral valves replacement \u2013 A comprehensive review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"Abdulaziz","family":"Joury","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antonio","family":"Duran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Merrill","family":"Stewart","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yvonne E.","family":"Gilliland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stephen M.","family":"Spindel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Salima","family":"Qamruddin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.58.1.20","article-title":"The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch","volume":"58","author":"Rahimtoola","year":"1978","journal-title":"Circulation."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1136\/hrt.2005.067363","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention","volume":"92","author":"Pibarot","year":"2006","journal-title":"Heart."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcmg.2018.10.020","article-title":"Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement","volume":"12","author":"Pibarot","year":"2019","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Imaging"},{"issue":"suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S34","DOI":"10.1093\/ejcts\/6.Supplement_1.S34","article-title":"Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients","volume":"6","author":"Dumesnil","year":"1992","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(00)00859-7","article-title":"Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention","volume":"36","author":"Philippe","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcmg.2018.04.018","article-title":"Obesity paradox in the clinical significance of effective prosthetic orifice area after aortic valve replacement","volume":"12","author":"Coisne","year":"2019","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Imaging"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1093\/ejcts\/ezy466","article-title":"Surgical aortic valve replacement and patient-prosthesis mismatch: a meta-analysis of 108 182 patients. Ur","volume":"56","author":"S\u00e1","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"issue":"20","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0040","article-title":"Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch","volume":"S0022-5223","author":"Vriesendorp","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1093\/ehjci\/jew025","volume":"17","author":"Lancellotti","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"975","DOI":"10.1016\/j.echo.2009.07.013","volume":"22","author":"Zoghbi","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Am Soc Echocardiogr"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1676814","article-title":"Limitations in the assessment of prosthesis-patient mismatch","volume":"68","author":"Amorim","year":"2020","journal-title":"Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1111\/jocs.12719","article-title":"Early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement using bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve in elderly patients: a propensity analysis","volume":"31","author":"Okamoto","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Card Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3361","DOI":"10.21037\/jtd.2018.06.03","article-title":"Late clinical outcomes after mechanical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: old versus new prostheses","volume":"10","author":"Lee","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Thorac Dis"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1097\/imi.0b013e3181a3484b","article-title":"Stentless versus stented bioprosthetic aortic valves: a consensus statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2008","volume":"4","author":"Pepper","year":"2009","journal-title":"Innovations (Phila)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1177\/0218492314533684","article-title":"Hemodynamic performance of trifecta: single-center experience of 400 patients","volume":"23","author":"Modi","year":"2015","journal-title":"Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2017.05.076","article-title":"The prevalence of patient-prosthesis mismatch can be reduced using the trifecta aortic prosthesis","volume":"105","author":"Hernandez-Vaquero","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2964","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm9092964","article-title":"Perceval or trifecta to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch","volume":"9","author":"Hernandez-Vaquero","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-16-0768","article-title":"Reducing prosthesis-patient mismatch with Edwards magna prosthesis for aortic valve replacement","volume":"81","author":"Kume","year":"2017","journal-title":"Circ J"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"530","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2006.03.089","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve","volume":"82","author":"Flameng","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.5090\/kjtcs.19.099","article-title":"Hemodynamic performance of pericardial bioprostheses in the aortic position","volume":"53","author":"Lee","year":"2020","journal-title":"Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3347","DOI":"10.1111\/jocs.15062","article-title":"Six-year follow-up of aortic valve reoperation rates: Carpentier-Edwards Perimount versus St","volume":"35","author":"Stubeda","year":"2020","journal-title":"Jude Medical Trifecta J Card Surg"},{"issue":"20","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0110","first-page":"33046","article-title":"Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch","volume":"S0022-5223","author":"Vriesendorp","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2004.08.028","article-title":"Lange exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves","volume":"129","author":"Eichinger","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"5 Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S269","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-4975(01)02551-6","article-title":"Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: midterm investigational trial results","volume":"71","author":"Thomson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2054","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2007.02.062","article-title":"Carpentier-Edwards perimount magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison","volume":"83","author":"Borger","year":"2007","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0130","first-page":"327","article-title":"Hemodynamic performance of the St. Jude Medical epic supra aortic stented valve","volume":"20","author":"Maitland","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Heart Valve Dis"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-8191.2009.00805.x","article-title":"Comparison of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and St. Jude Medical Epic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement--a retrospective echocardiographic short-term study","volume":"24","author":"Goetzenich","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Card Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.1016\/j.echo.2014.01.002","article-title":"Comprehensive hemodynamic comparison and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch between the St. Jude Medical trifecta and epic bioprosthetic aortic valves","volume":"27","author":"Yadlapati","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Soc Echocardiogr"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0145","first-page":"138","article-title":"A three year experience with the Toronto stentless porcine valve","volume":"4","author":"Berg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S282","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-4975(01)02540-1","article-title":"Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third-generation stented bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement","volume":"71","author":"Jamieson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1016\/j.repc.2017.11.015","article-title":"Hemodynamic and clinical performance of solo stentless bioprosthetic aortic valves","volume":"37","author":"Andrade","year":"2018","journal-title":"Rev Port Cardiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1956","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2016.05.080","article-title":"Pericardial Stentless valve for aortic valve replacement: long-term results","volume":"102","author":"Repossini","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2279","DOI":"10.1111\/jocs.14837","article-title":"Long-term clinical outcomes of the Toronto stentless porcine valve: 15-year results from dual centers","volume":"35","author":"Une","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Card Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0170","first-page":"633","article-title":"Early hemodynamic evaluation of trifecta and freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study","volume":"23","author":"Tasca","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Heart Valve Dis"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.1111\/jocs.12536","article-title":"Hemodynamic comparison between trifecta and freestyle aortic valve during exercise in patients with small aortic root","volume":"30","author":"Tasca","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Card Surg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-196110000-00017","article-title":"Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis","volume":"154","author":"Starr","year":"1961","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2013.05.034","article-title":"Starr-Edwards aortic valve: forty-four years old and still working!","volume":"146","author":"Saxena","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"21","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2850","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.511659","article-title":"Twenty-five-year experience with the Bj\u00f6rk-Shiley convexoconcave heart valve: a continuing clinical concern","volume":"111","author":"Blot","year":"2005","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2013.04.075","article-title":"Aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch and long-term outcomes: 19-year single-center experience","volume":"96","author":"Tully","year":"2013","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2004.10.002","article-title":"Comparative evaluation of small-size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP heart valve prostheses","volume":"79","author":"Otero","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2004.03.021","article-title":"Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves","volume":"128","author":"Bottio","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2009.09.013","article-title":"Assessment of the St. Jude Medical regent prosthetic valve by continuous-wave Doppler and dobutamine stress echocardiography","volume":"89","author":"Sezai","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1007\/s00380-012-0306-x","article-title":"Mid-term results of small-sized St. Jude Medical regent prosthetic valves (21 mm or less) for small aortic annulus","volume":"28","author":"Mizoguchi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Heart Vessels"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0220","first-page":"531","article-title":"The Carbomedics aortic heart valve prosthesis: a review","volume":"45","author":"Aagaard","year":"2004","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0225","article-title":"Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch has no negative effect on Patients\u2019 functional status after aortic valve replacement with CarboMedics prosthesis","volume":"5","author":"Alizadeh-Ghavidel","year":"2016","journal-title":"Res Cardiovasc Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2009.07.039","article-title":"Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses","volume":"139","author":"Sezai","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1186\/1749-8090-9-17","article-title":"Seventeen-millimeter St. Jude Medical regent valve in patients with small aortic annulus: dose moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch matter?","volume":"17","author":"Hu","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2008.09.051","article-title":"The 17-mm St. Jude Medical regent valve is a valid option for patients with a small aortic annulus","volume":"87","author":"Okamura","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"20","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1883","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2009.01.060","article-title":"Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis","volume":"53","author":"Clavel","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehp537","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis","volume":"31","author":"Jilaihawi","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0255","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2014.06.1195","article-title":"Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in Transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis","volume":"64","author":"Pibarot","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0260","series-title":"The impact of prosthesis\u2013patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years","first-page":"12","author":"Head","year":"2021"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0265","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.09.001","article-title":"Prosthesis\u2013patient mismatch in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement","volume":"72","author":"Herrmann","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0270","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2015.10.070","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a randomized trial of a self-expanding prosthesis","volume":"151","author":"Zorn","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"15","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0275","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.3316","article-title":"Comparison of balloon-expandable vs self-expandable valves in patients undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the CHOICE randomized clinical trial","volume":"311","author":"Abdel-Wahab","year":"2014","journal-title":"JAMA."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0280","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2015.06.026","article-title":"1-year outcomes after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves","volume":"66","author":"Abdel-Wahab","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0285","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2019.12.026","article-title":"5-year outcomes after TAVR with balloon-expandable versus self-expanding valves","volume":"13","author":"Abdel-Wahab","year":"2020","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0290","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1111\/joic.12520","article-title":"Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"31","author":"Nalluri","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Interv Cardiol"},{"issue":"21","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0295","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2647","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2019.03.483","article-title":"3-year outcomes after valve-in-valve Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses","volume":"73","author":"Webb","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0300","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1007\/s11886-011-0172-7","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update","volume":"13","author":"Dumesnil","year":"2011","journal-title":"Curr Cardiol Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0305","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2016.57.2.328","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: comparison of different methods of effective orifice area calculation","volume":"57","author":"Cho","year":"2016","journal-title":"Yonsei Med J"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0310","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2004.10.073","article-title":"Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement","volume":"45","author":"Li","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0315","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631549","article-title":"Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival after mitral valve replacement","volume":"115","author":"Magne","year":"2007","journal-title":"Circulation."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0320","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1093\/icvts\/ivx426","article-title":"Does patient-prosthesis mismatch have a negative impact on outcomes following mitral valve replacement?","volume":"26","author":"Aboul-Hassan","year":"2018","journal-title":"Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0325","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2009.01.056","article-title":"Effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival with mitral valve replacement: assessment to 15 years","volume":"87","author":"Jamieson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0330","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2013.07.116","article-title":"Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on tricuspid valve regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension following mitral valve replacement","volume":"168","author":"Angeloni","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"issue":"23","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0335","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2685","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408","article-title":"Aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus","volume":"139","author":"Freitas-Ferraz","year":"2019","journal-title":"Circulation."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0340","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1388","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2016.01.048","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: effect on long-term survival","volume":"101","author":"Swinkels","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0345","first-page":"56","article-title":"Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch in the aortic position: twenty-year experience with Korean patients","volume":"22","author":"Jeong","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Heart Valve Dis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0350","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2015.04.161","article-title":"Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a predictor of survival or a surrogate marker of co-morbidities in cardiac surgery?","volume":"190","author":"Dayan","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0355","first-page":"814","article-title":"The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis","volume":"14","author":"Bleiziffer","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Heart Valve Dis"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0360","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcmg.2015.10.026","article-title":"Predictors and outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement","volume":"9","author":"Dayan","year":"2016","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Imaging"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0365","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.athoracsur.2018.01.090","article-title":"The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement","volume":"106","author":"Fallon","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"114","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0370","first-page":"I553","article-title":"Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch","volume":"4","author":"Kulik","year":"2006","journal-title":"Circulation."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0375","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2003","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-4975(02)04034-1","article-title":"Hemodynamics and early clinical performance of the St. Jude Medical regent mechanical aortic valve","volume":"74","author":"Bach","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ann Thorac Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(00)00859-7","article-title":"Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention","volume":"36","author":"Pibarot","year":"2000","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1940","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2013.12.051","article-title":"Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses","volume":"148","author":"Ugur","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1093\/ejcts\/ezv493","article-title":"Randomized comparison of exercise haemodynamics of freestyle, magna ease and trifecta bioprostheses after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis","volume":"50","author":"Bach","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0395","first-page":"334","article-title":"The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements","volume":"10","author":"O\u2019Brien","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Heart Valve Dis"},{"issue":"12 Suppl 1","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0400","first-page":"I57","article-title":"Hemodynamic performance at rest and during exercise after aortic valve replacement: comparison of pulmonary autografts versus aortic homografts","volume":"106","author":"Laforest","year":"2002","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2015.10.097","article-title":"Incidence, timing, and predictors of valve hemodynamic deterioration after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: multicenter registry","volume":"67","author":"Del Trigo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1136\/thx.25.3.339","article-title":"Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement","volume":"25","author":"Nicks","year":"1970","journal-title":"Thorax"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0415","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5223(19)38105-X","article-title":"Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. New operative technique","volume":"78","author":"Manouguian","year":"1979","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0420","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2007.01.097","article-title":"Aortic root enlargement: what are the operative risks?","volume":"134","author":"Dhareshwar","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0425","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1464","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2006.12.071","article-title":"The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement","volume":"133","author":"Lam","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"22","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0430","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2018.09.045","article-title":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: it is neither rare nor benign","volume":"72","author":"Pibarot","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0435","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"766","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5223(97)70080-1","article-title":"Aortic and mitral valve replacement with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body","volume":"114","author":"David","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004_bb0440","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtcvs.2004.09.032","article-title":"Aortic and mitral valve replacement with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body: an analysis of clinical outcomes","volume":"129","author":"De Oliveira","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg"}],"container-title":["Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0033062022000226?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0033062022000226?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,22]],"date-time":"2025-09-22T00:19:55Z","timestamp":1758500395000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0033062022000226"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"references-count":88,"alternative-id":["S0033062022000226"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0033-0620"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0033-0620","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Prosthesis-patient mismatch following aortic and mitral valves replacement \u2013 A comprehensive review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pcad.2022.02.004","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}