{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,12]],"date-time":"2026-09-12T01:11:16Z","timestamp":1789175476455,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,1]],"date-time":"2017-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,1]],"date-time":"2016-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1475280000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Practical Laboratory Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,4,29]],"date-time":"2017-04-29T05:21:12Z","timestamp":1493443272000},"page":"52-59","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":42,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Traditional versus reverse syphilis algorithms: A comparison at a large academic medical center"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Craig D.","family":"Dunseth","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bradley A.","family":"Ford","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew D.","family":"Krasowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/978-81-322-1774-9_5","article-title":"Current trend on syphilis diagnosis: issues and challenges","volume":"808","author":"Morshed","year":"2014","journal-title":"Adv. Exp. Med. Biol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1128\/CVI.00681-14","article-title":"Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis","volume":"22","author":"Morshed","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin. Vaccine Immunol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.02555-10","article-title":"Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays","volume":"49","author":"Binnicker","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/OLQ.0000000000000126","article-title":"Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection","volume":"41","author":"Gratzer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Sex. Transm. Dis."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib5","unstructured":"C. Centers for Disease, Prevention, Discordant Results from Reverse Sequence Syphilis Screening \u2013 Five Laboratories, United States, 2006\u20132010, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 60(5), 2011, pp. 133\u20137."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1373\/clinchem.2012.184234","article-title":"The impact of analytical sensitivity on screening algorithms for syphilis","volume":"58","author":"Zhang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin. Chem."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.05636-11","article-title":"Direct comparison of the traditional and reverse syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis","volume":"50","author":"Binnicker","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib8","first-page":"119","article-title":"Performance of chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay in screening for syphilis in pregnant women from low-prevalence, resource-limited setting","volume":"99","author":"Boonchaoy","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Med. Assoc. Thail."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.3343\/alm.2016.36.1.23","article-title":"Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays","volume":"36","author":"Huh","year":"2016","journal-title":"Ann. Lab. Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/OLQ.0b013e3181ec51f1","article-title":"Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms","volume":"38","author":"Owusu-Edusei","year":"2011","journal-title":"Sex. Transm. Dis."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1097\/QCO.0b013e32834e9a3c","article-title":"Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis?","volume":"25","author":"Binnicker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib12","unstructured":"Iowa-2015 State Health Profile (CDC), 2015. \u3008http:\/\/doi.org\/www.cdc.gov\/nchhstp\/stateprofiles\/pdf\/iowa_profile.pdf\u3009."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib13","unstructured":"M.E. Patton, J.R. Su, R. Nelson, H. Weinstock, C. Centers for Disease, Prevention, Primary and Secondary Syphilis \u2013 United States, 2005\u20132013, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 63(18), 2014, pp. 402\u20136."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.4103\/2153-3539.129450","article-title":"Autoverification in a core clinical chemistry laboratory at an academic medical center","volume":"5","author":"Krasowski","year":"2014","journal-title":"J. Pathol. Inform."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1116","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciu087","article-title":"Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management","volume":"58","author":"Tong","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin. Infect. Dis."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.00702-11","article-title":"Evaluation of a PCR test for detection of treponema pallidum in swabs and blood","volume":"50","author":"Grange","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1973","DOI":"10.4049\/jimmunol.131.4.1973","article-title":"Humoral immune response in experimental syphilis to polypeptides of Treponema pallidum","volume":"131","author":"Hanff","year":"1983","journal-title":"J. Immunol."},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-005664","article-title":"Comparison of an automated rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test with the conventional RPR card test in syphilis testing","volume":"4","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1128\/JCM.06347-11","article-title":"It is time to use treponema-specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis","volume":"50","author":"Loeffelholz","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Clin. Microbiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib20","unstructured":"G. Penicillin, Benzathine, 2016. \u3008http:\/\/www.ashp.org\/menu\/DrugShortages\/CurrentShortages\/bulletin.aspx?Id=1232\u3009."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-015-0137-7","article-title":"Promoting improved utilization of laboratory testing through changes in an electronic medical record: experience at an academic medical center","volume":"15","author":"Krasowski","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/civ445","article-title":"Discordant syphilis immunoassays in pregnancy: perinatal outcomes and implications for clinical management","volume":"61","author":"Mmeje","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clin. Infect. Dis."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2041","DOI":"10.1007\/s10096-015-2449-z","article-title":"Evaluation of different confirmatory algorithms using seven treponemal tests on Architect Syphilis TP-positive\/RPR-negative sera","volume":"34","author":"Jonckheere","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1128\/CVI.05335-11","article-title":"Analysis of bioplex syphilis IgG quantitative results in different patient populations","volume":"18","author":"Loeffelholz","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin. Vaccine Immunol."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/OLQ.0000000000000066","article-title":"Improved reverse screening algorithm for Treponema pallidum antibody using signal-to-cutoff ratios from chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay","volume":"41","author":"Dai","year":"2014","journal-title":"Sex. Transm. Dis."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1097\/OLQ.0b013e318205491a","article-title":"Evaluation of an IgM\/IgG sensitive enzyme immunoassay and the utility of index values for the screening of syphilis infection in a high-risk population","volume":"38","author":"Wong","year":"2011","journal-title":"Sex. Transm. Dis."}],"container-title":["Practical Laboratory Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2352551716300361?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2352551716300361?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]],"date-time":"2023-08-23T06:21:14Z","timestamp":1692771674000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2352551716300361"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["S2352551716300361"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007","relation":{},"ISSN":["2352-5517"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2352-5517","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Traditional versus reverse syphilis algorithms: A comparison at a large academic medical center","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.plabm.2017.04.007","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}