{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,4]],"date-time":"2026-11-04T17:19:03Z","timestamp":1793812743738,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":76,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,21]],"date-time":"2018-02-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519171200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["PM&amp;R"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:label\/>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Objective performance\u2010based outcome measures (OMs) have the potential to provide unbiased and reproducible assessments of limb function. However, very few of these performance\u2010based OMs have been validated for upper limb (UL) prosthesis users. OMs validated in other clinical populations (eg, neurologic or musculoskeletal conditions) could be used to fill gaps in existing performance\u2010based OMs for UL amputees. Additionally, a joint review might reveal consistent gaps across multiple clinical populations. Therefore, the objective of this review was to systematically characterize prominent measures used in both sets of clinical populations with regard to (1) location of task performance around the body, (2) possible grips employed, (3) bilateral versus unilateral task participation, and (4) details of scoring mechanisms. A systematic literature search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health electronic databases for variations of the following terms:\n                      <jats:italic>stroke<\/jats:italic>\n                      ,\n                      <jats:italic>musculoskeletal dysfunction<\/jats:italic>\n                      ,\n                      <jats:italic>amputation<\/jats:italic>\n                      ,\n                      <jats:italic>prosthesis<\/jats:italic>\n                      ,\n                      <jats:italic>upper limb<\/jats:italic>\n                      ,\n                      <jats:italic>outcome<\/jats:italic>\n                      ,\n                      <jats:italic>assessments<\/jats:italic>\n                      . Articles were included if they described performance\u2010based OMs developed for disabilities of the UL. Results show most tasks were performed with 1 hand in the space directly in front of the participant. The tip, tripod, and cylindrical grips were most commonly used for the specific tasks. Few measures assessed sensation and movement quality. Overall, several limitations in OMs were identified. The solution to these limitations may be to modify and validate existing measures originally developed for other clinical populations as first steps to more aptly measure prosthesis use while more complete assessments for UL prosthesis users are being developed.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Level III<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pmrj.2018.02.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,21]],"date-time":"2018-02-21T04:40:48Z","timestamp":1519188048000},"page":"951","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":57,"title":["Evaluation of Performance\u2010Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Sophie","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C. Janice","family":"Hsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lauren","family":"Trent","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tiffany","family":"Ryan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nathan T.","family":"Kearns","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eugene F.","family":"Civillico","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kimberly L.","family":"Kontson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_2","volume-title":"VA\/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Upper Extremity Amputation Rehabilitation","author":"The Management of Upper Extremity Amputation Rehabilitation Working Group","year":"2014"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199009000-00003","article-title":"The artificial substitution of missing hands with myoelectrical prostheses","volume":"258","author":"N\u00e4der M.","year":"1990","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fnins.2016.00209"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_2","unstructured":"D.Weber.Hand Proprioception and Touch Interfaces (HAPTIX). Available athttp:\/\/www.darpa.mil\/program\/hand\u2010proprioception\u2010and\u2010touch\u2010interfaces. Accessed January 18 \u20092017."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anclin.2015.10.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2017-006481"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/03093641003776976"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1479-5868-5-56"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2011.10.0207","article-title":"Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function","volume":"49","author":"Hebert J.S.","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2011.11.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"P3","DOI":"10.1097\/JPO.0b013e3181ae9637","article-title":"Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: A systematic review of the peer\u2010reviewed literature, 1970 to 2009","volume":"21","author":"Wright V.","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Prosthet Orthot"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2377-12-21"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1177\/0309364614554030","article-title":"Assessment of body\u2010powered upper limb prostheses by able\u2010bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine\u2010Hole Peg Test","volume":"40","author":"Haverkate L.","year":"2016","journal-title":"Prosthet Orthot Int"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1097\/JPO.0b013e31826ff91c","article-title":"Reliability and validity of outcome measures for upper limb amputation","volume":"24","author":"Resnik L.","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Prosthet Orthot"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2012.12.0231","article-title":"Influence of standardized activities on validity of Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control","volume":"50","author":"Lindner H.Y.","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2013.09.0197"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0361","article-title":"Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control: Evaluation of construct and rating scale","volume":"41","author":"Lindner H.Y.","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2012.10.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1080\/16501970500312222","article-title":"Intra\u2010 and inter\u2010rater reliability of the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control","volume":"38","author":"Hermansson L.M.","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_2","first-page":"166","article-title":"Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control: a new Rasch\u2010built measure of prosthetic hand control","volume":"37","author":"Hermansson L.M.","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/86.2.245","article-title":"Comparing 2 versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory with the Action Research Arm Test","volume":"86","author":"Barreca S.R.","year":"2006","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2011.03.028","article-title":"Measuring upper limb capacity in patients after stroke: Reliability and validity of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale","volume":"92","author":"Houwink A.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ageing\/27.2.107"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215502cr530oa"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2009.09.0155"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0560"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-1831","article-title":"Intra\u2010rater and inter\u2010rater reliability at the item level of the Action Research Arm Test for patients with stroke","volume":"46","author":"Nordin A.","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1080\/165019701750165916","article-title":"The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl\u2010Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients","volume":"33","author":"Lee J.H.","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1097\/MRR.0b013e32834d330a","article-title":"The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl\u2010Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper\u2010extremity rehabilitation robotic training","volume":"34","author":"Wei X.J.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215502cr534oa","article-title":"Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale","volume":"16","author":"Lee J.H.","year":"2002","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(97)90427-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1310\/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W","article-title":"Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection","volume":"11","author":"Barreca S.","year":"2004","journal-title":"Top Stroke Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.2182\/cjot.2010.77.3.6","article-title":"Clinical utility of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory for stroke rehabilitation","volume":"77","author":"Gustafsson L.A.","year":"2010","journal-title":"Can J Occup Ther"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-10-106","article-title":"Objectively\u2010assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross\u2010cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI)","volume":"10","author":"Schuster C.","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1310\/tsr1804-382","article-title":"Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory\u20109 (CAHAI\u20109): perceived clinical utility within 14 days of stroke","volume":"18","author":"Rowland T.J.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Top Stroke Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2005.03.017"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/73.7.447"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20070186"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2007.12.041"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1310\/tsr18s01-599","article-title":"Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients","volume":"18","author":"Arya K.N.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Top Stroke Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2013.03.007"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2014.01.014","article-title":"Is the long form of the Fugl\u2010Meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke?","volume":"95","author":"Chen K.L.","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089\/neu.2010.1504"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/NPT.0b013e3181a33638"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215504cr722oa"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/65.2.175"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/0963828032000157970"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2004.12.028"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09638280500476188"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0519","article-title":"Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the upper limb subscales of the Motor Assessment Scale using a Rasch analysis model","volume":"42","author":"Miller K.J.","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1440-1630.2009.00810.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2012.12.014"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215506cr877oa"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/09638288.2011.606343"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"871","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215506072181","article-title":"Can quality of movement be measured? Rasch analysis and inter\u2010rater reliability of the Motor Evaluation Scale for Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients (MESUPES)","volume":"20","author":"Van de Winckel A.","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1177\/154596830201600306","article-title":"Assessing the Motor Status Score: A scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke","volume":"16","author":"Ferraro M.","year":"2002","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/026921559701100107"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0463"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2011.09.0179","article-title":"Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures","volume":"49","author":"Bouwsema H.","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2010.10.034","article-title":"Measuring upper limb capacity in poststroke patients: Development, fit of the monotone homogeneity model, unidimensionality, fit of the double monotonicity model, differential item functioning, internal consistency, and feasibility of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale","volume":"92","author":"Roorda L.D.","year":"2011","journal-title":"SULCS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1097\/MRR.0b013e3280118e65","article-title":"The discriminative power of the Wolf motor function test in assessing upper extremity functions in persons with stroke","volume":"29","author":"Ang J.H.","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20110175","article-title":"Rasch validation of the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in people with chronic stroke and subacute stroke","volume":"92","author":"Chen H.F.","year":"2012","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.32.7.1635"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2001.23183"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_66_2","volume-title":"Incorporating valid and reliable outcome measures into care for patients with stroke: Suggestions from the LEAPS Clinical Trial","author":"Fugl\u2010Meyer Assessment of Physical Performance","year":"2008"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4160-4978-4.00014-4","volume-title":"Functional Movement Development Across the Life Span","author":"Cech D.J.","year":"2012"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_68_2","volume-title":"Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications","author":"Shumway\u2010Cook A.","year":"1995"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.5014\/ajot.2016.015487","article-title":"Range of motion requirements for upper\u2010limb activities of daily living","volume":"70","author":"Gates D.H.","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Occup Ther"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_70_2","first-page":"176","volume-title":"The Neuroscience of Human Movement","author":"Leonard C.","year":"1998"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-016-0197-7","article-title":"Learning to use a body\u2010powered prosthesis: Changes in functionality and kinematics","volume":"13","author":"Huinink L.H.","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_72_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2011.06.026"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jht.2014.04.002","article-title":"An introductory study of common grasps used by adults during performance of activities of daily living","volume":"27","author":"Vergara M.","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Hand Ther"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_74_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1097\/JPO.0000000000000058","article-title":"Ease of activities of daily living with conventional and multigrip myoelectric hands","volume":"27","author":"Pr\u00f6bsting E.","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Prosthet Orthot"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_75_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03093640600994581"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_76_2","first-page":"29","article-title":"A review of the failures in use of the below elbow myoelectric prosthesis","volume":"36","author":"Millstein S.","year":"1982","journal-title":"Orthot Prosthet"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_77_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1097\/JPO.0b013e31817ecb16","article-title":"Overuse syndrome and the unilateral upper limb amputee: Consequences and prevention","volume":"20","author":"Gambrell C.R.","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Prosthet Orthot"}],"container-title":["PM&amp;R"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1016%2Fj.pmrj.2018.02.008","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1934148218300996?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1934148218300996?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1016\/j.pmrj.2018.02.008","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,14]],"date-time":"2023-09-14T16:36:15Z","timestamp":1694709375000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1016\/j.pmrj.2018.02.008"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,21]]},"references-count":76,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1016\/j.pmrj.2018.02.008"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pmrj.2018.02.008","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1934-1482","1934-1563"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1934-1482","type":"print"},{"value":"1934-1563","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2017-07-22","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-02-08","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2018-02-21","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}