{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,30]],"date-time":"2026-08-30T18:51:49Z","timestamp":1788115909589,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,1]],"date-time":"2022-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646092800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,1]],"date-time":"2021-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1638316800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Prostate International"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,7]],"date-time":"2021-12-07T02:43:57Z","timestamp":1638845037000},"page":"34-37","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Is antibiotic prophylaxis still mandatory for transperineal prostate biopsy? Results of a comparative study"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4209-8670","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giacomo M.","family":"Pirola","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3486-1226","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marilena","family":"Gubbiotti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emanuele","family":"Rubilotta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7354-9190","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniele","family":"Castellani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicol\u00f2","family":"Trabacchin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Tafuri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Princiotta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eugenio","family":"Martorana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3697-6457","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Filippo","family":"Annino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Antonelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-7796.152017","article-title":"Current practice of prostate biopsy in Australia and New Zealand: A survey","volume":"7","author":"Davis","year":"2015","journal-title":"Urol Ann"},{"issue":"1 Suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib2","first-page":"S12","article-title":"Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy","volume":"189","author":"Nam","year":"2013","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1784","DOI":"10.1017\/S0950268815002885","article-title":"The global burden of major infectious complications following prostate biopsy","volume":"144","author":"Bennett","year":"2016","journal-title":"Epidemiol Infect"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib4","first-page":"76","article-title":"Bacteremia and bacteriuria after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy","volume":"164","author":"Lindert","year":"2000","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.05.049","article-title":"Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy","volume":"64","author":"Loeb","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.06.003","article-title":"Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study","volume":"63","author":"Wagenlehner","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02837-0","article-title":"Antibiotic resistance, hospitalizations, and mortality related to prostate biopsy: first report from the Norwegian Patient Registry","volume":"38","author":"Johansen","year":"2020","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib8","first-page":"952","article-title":"The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy\u2014are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis?","volume":"179","author":"Feliciano","year":"2008","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.03.001","article-title":"Comparison of a combined regimen of fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin with ciprofloxacin alone as antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy in the era of high fluoroquinolone-resistant rectal flora","volume":"9","author":"Lim","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prostate Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.09.029","article-title":"Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy","volume":"71","author":"Hara","year":"2008","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.5152\/tud.2019.19106","article-title":"Prostate MRI and transperineal TRUS\/MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection: clinical practice updates","volume":"45","author":"Martorana","year":"2019","journal-title":"Turk J Urol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib12","series-title":"EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections","isbn-type":"print","author":"Bonkat","year":"2021","ISBN":"https:\/\/id.crossref.org\/isbn\/9789492671134"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16089","DOI":"10.1038\/srep16089","article-title":"Comparison between ultrasound guided transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized, and controlled trial","volume":"5","author":"Guo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"552","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(98)00296-9","article-title":"Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy","volume":"52","author":"Kapoor","year":"1998","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.2000.00576.x","article-title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study","volume":"85","author":"Aron","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"735","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-015-0967-3","article-title":"Advantages of single-puncture transperineal saturation biopsy of prostate: analysis of outcomes in 125 patients using our scheme","volume":"47","author":"Martorana","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1186\/s13756-018-0336-y","article-title":"Estimating the burden of antimicrobial resistance: a systematic literature review","volume":"7","author":"Naylor","year":"2018","journal-title":"Antimicrob Resist Infect Control"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c2096","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c2096","article-title":"Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"340","author":"Costelloe","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib19","first-page":"1830","article-title":"Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare","volume":"186","author":"Loeb","year":"2011","journal-title":"J\u00a0Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.12.067","article-title":"Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli as cause of postprostate biopsy infection: implications for prophylaxis and treatment","volume":"77","author":"Zaytoun","year":"2011","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3861","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-021-03699-1","article-title":"Infection rate and complications after 621 transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies in local anesthesia without standard antibiotic prophylaxis","volume":"39","author":"G\u00fcnzel","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1038\/s41391-020-0204-8","article-title":"\"TREXIT 2020\": why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now","volume":"23","author":"Grummet","year":"2020","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2020.10.001","article-title":"Rebiopsy rate after transperineal or transrectal prostate biopsy","volume":"9","author":"Marenco Jimenez","year":"2021","journal-title":"Prostate Int"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1199","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-016-1985-1","article-title":"Zero hospital admissions for infection after 577 transperineal prostate biopsies using single dose cephazolin prophylaxis","volume":"35","author":"Pepdjonovic","year":"2017","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2463","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-020-03454-y","article-title":"Risk factors for infection complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy","volume":"39","author":"Ding","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"782.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2021.02.016","article-title":"Safety and side effects of transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis","volume":"39","author":"Sigle","year":"2021","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.1086","article-title":"Free-hand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in the office without antibiotic prophylaxis: experience with 304 cases","volume":"35","author":"Szabo","year":"2021","journal-title":"J\u00a0Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000002251","article-title":"Infection rate after transperineal prostate biopsy with and without prophylactic antibiotics: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies","volume":"207","author":"Castellani","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["Prostate International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2287888221000593?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S2287888221000593?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,6]],"date-time":"2025-11-06T09:01:06Z","timestamp":1762419666000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S2287888221000593"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S2287888221000593"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001","relation":{},"ISSN":["2287-8882"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2287-8882","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Is antibiotic prophylaxis still mandatory for transperineal prostate biopsy? Results of a comparative study","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Prostate International","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prnil.2021.11.001","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2022 Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}