{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T20:43:29Z","timestamp":1789764209818,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,1]],"date-time":"2024-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709251200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,1]],"date-time":"2024-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709251200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100022105","name":"Oral Reconstruction Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100022105","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.jp","prosdent.org","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,4]],"date-time":"2024-01-04T19:22:56Z","timestamp":1704396176000},"page":"475.e1-475.e7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"131","author":[{"given":"Juli\u00e1n","family":"Conejo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas H.","family":"Yoo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pablo J.","family":"Atria","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Howard","family":"Fraiman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus B.","family":"Blatz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.12.017","article-title":"Digital versus conventional impressions of fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"116","author":"Chochlidakis","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12527","article-title":"Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review","volume":"27","author":"Ahlholm","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3625","article-title":"Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: A systematic review","volume":"29","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02219.x","article-title":"Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: An optical scanning study","volume":"23","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2021.09.001","article-title":"Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review","volume":"129","author":"Carneiro Pereira","year":"2023","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12567","article-title":"Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: Accuracy outcomes","volume":"27","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13211","article-title":"Digital vs conventional implant impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"29","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2017.10.005","article-title":"A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation","volume":"62","author":"Monaco","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13166","article-title":"Digital workflow for implant rehabilitation with double full-arch monolithic zirconia prostheses","volume":"29","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2017.12.010","article-title":"Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study","volume":"120","author":"Tischler","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13162","article-title":"Digital versus conventional full-arch implant impressions: A prospective study on 16 edentulous maxillae","volume":"29","author":"Chochlidakis","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12801","article-title":"Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: Current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry","volume":"28","author":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s00769-006-0191-z","article-title":"Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision","volume":"12","author":"Menditto","year":"2007","journal-title":"Accred Qual Assur"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13135","article-title":"Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner","volume":"29","author":"Revilla-Le\u00f3n","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12994","article-title":"Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: A comparative study","volume":"28","author":"Amin","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00416.x","article-title":"In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks: A comparison between \u201cvirtual\u201d and \u201cphysical\u201d assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements","volume":"14","author":"Jemt","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib17","first-page":"270","article-title":"Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Br\u00e5nemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup","volume":"6","author":"Jemt","year":"1991","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib18","first-page":"506","article-title":"Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: A critical review","volume":"25","author":"Abduo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01414.x","article-title":"Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years","volume":"18","author":"Kreissl","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3418","article-title":"Implications of implant framework misfit: A systematic review of biomechanical sequelae","volume":"29","author":"Abduo","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib21","first-page":"216","article-title":"Accuracy of implant impression techniques","volume":"11","author":"Assif","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(90)90296-O","article-title":"Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins","volume":"64","author":"Mojon","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e3180587b3f","article-title":"Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants","volume":"16","author":"Cabral","year":"2007","journal-title":"Implant Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib24","first-page":"112","article-title":"Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures","volume":"12","author":"Assif","year":"1992","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-011-0622-z","article-title":"Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--A digital approach.","volume":"16","author":"Stimmelmayr","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib26","first-page":"217","article-title":"Dimensional changes of dental impression materials by thermal changes","volume":"58","author":"Kwang-Mahn","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Biomed Mater Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.5431","article-title":"Accuracy of digital vs conventional implant impression approach: A three-dimensional comparative in vitro analysis","volume":"32","author":"Basaki","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13297","article-title":"Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study","volume":"29","author":"Alshawaf","year":"2018","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-17-00142","article-title":"Accuracy of casts fabricated by digital and conventional implant impressions","volume":"45","author":"Bohner","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.10.029","article-title":"Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans","volume":"124","author":"Papaspyridakos","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"}],"container-title":["The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022391323008284?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0022391323008284?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,20]],"date-time":"2025-09-20T11:04:26Z","timestamp":1758366266000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0022391323008284"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S0022391323008284"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-3913"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-3913","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2023.12.012","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2024 by the Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}