{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T22:56:21Z","timestamp":1761173781865,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"17","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,1]],"date-time":"2023-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1701388800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,1]],"date-time":"2023-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1701388800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Progr\u00e8s en Urologie"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,21]],"date-time":"2023-11-21T20:56:52Z","timestamp":1700600212000},"page":"1044-1046","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Routine uterine preservation during sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse\u00a0\u2013\u00a0pro"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"T.","family":"Thubert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Degez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","article-title":"Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence","volume":"89","author":"Olsen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"13","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1016\/j.purol.2009.09.022","article-title":"Should a hysterectomy be carried at the same time as surgery for a prolapse by vaginal route?","volume":"19","author":"Debodinance","year":"2009","journal-title":"Prog Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2859-6","article-title":"Uterus-preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a patient-centered outcome report and video of a continuous series of 245 patients","volume":"27","author":"Veit-Rubin","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","article-title":"Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"24","author":"Barber","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2008.08.010","article-title":"Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study","volume":"15","author":"Rosen","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Minimally Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.035","article-title":"Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"213","author":"Ridgeway","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-053679","article-title":"Protocol for a prospective multisite cohort study investigating hysterectomy versus uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: the HUPPS study","volume":"11","author":"Scime","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","article-title":"Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines","volume":"219","author":"Meriwether","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.4293\/108680812X13462882736132","article-title":"Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of perioperative complications and anatomical outcomes","volume":"16","author":"Bojahr","year":"2012","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2217","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05534-0","article-title":"Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation","volume":"34","author":"Sato","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05403-2","article-title":"Clinical and outcomes complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7\u00a0years","volume":"34","author":"Chan","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","article-title":"Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"de Oliveira","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1328","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002913","article-title":"Association between concomitant hysterectomy and repeat surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair in a cohort of nearly 100,000 women","volume":"132","author":"Dallas","year":"2018","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05263-w","article-title":"Prolapse and mesh reoperations following sacrocolpopexy: comparing supracervical hysterectomy, total hysterectomy, and no hysterectomy","volume":"34","author":"Kikuchi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3131","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04858-z","article-title":"Prevalence of histological abnormalities in hysterectomy specimens performed for prolapse. A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"32","author":"Nicholson","year":"2021","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-023-05576-4","article-title":"The incidence and risk factors of occult malignancy in patients receiving vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse","author":"Ryu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1481","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-2041-3","article-title":"Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy","volume":"24","author":"Costantini","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","article-title":"Uterine-preserving POP surgery","volume":"24","author":"Gutman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23026","article-title":"Efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of laparoscopic single sheet mesh sacrohysteropexy","volume":"36","author":"Pandeva","year":"2017","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0100","first-page":"e37874","article-title":"Outcomes of pregnancy and recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with uterine preservation: a retrospective case-series study","volume":"15","author":"Alsary","year":"2023","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31827d8667","article-title":"Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse","volume":"19","author":"Frick","year":"2013","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1-6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","article-title":"Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse","volume":"209","author":"Korbly","year":"2013","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Progr\u00e8s en Urologie"],"original-title":[],"language":"fr","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1166708723002956?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1166708723002956?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T06:37:33Z","timestamp":1761115053000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1166708723002956"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"17","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S1166708723002956"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002","relation":{},"ISSN":["1166-7087"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1166-7087"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Routine uterine preservation during sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse\u00a0\u2013\u00a0pro","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Progr\u00e8s en Urologie","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.purol.2023.11.002","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}