{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T09:15:09Z","timestamp":1791969309122,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1777593600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1777593600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,2]],"date-time":"2026-04-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1775088000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004385","name":"Universiteit Gent","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004385","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002913","name":"Government of Flanders","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002913","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","radiographyonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Radiography"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,16]],"date-time":"2026-04-16T21:09:13Z","timestamp":1776373753000},"page":"103410","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Image quality standards in digital mammography: A consensus statement"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3254-6430","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"L.","family":"Vandendaele","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4842-7877","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"P.J.","family":"De Visschere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Hendrickx","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3218-6917","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Wallaert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"M.-M.","family":"Goossens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Van Herck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2449-5872","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"L.","family":"Cockmartin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Van Ongeval","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9070-0849","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M.","family":"van Gurp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.13130724","article-title":"Breast cancer detected with screening US: reasons for nondetection at mammography","volume":"270","author":"Bae","year":"2014","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-13-208","article-title":"Mammogram image quality as a potential contributor to disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis: an observational study","volume":"13","author":"Rauscher","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3971","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2776253","article-title":"Does image quality matter? Impact of resolution and noise on mammographic task performance","volume":"34","author":"Saunders","year":"2007","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib4","article-title":"In-depth retrospective review of originally negative screening mammograms from women with confirmed breast cancer","volume":"106","author":"Vandendaele","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Belg Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib5","series-title":"BreastScreen Aotearoa National Policy and quality standards","year":"2013"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib6","series-title":"Guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening (National screening service Dublin, Ireland)","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib7","series-title":"samenwerking met het Centrum voor Kankeropsporing (CvKO) en na advies van de Vlaamse werkgroep)","year":"2019"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib8","series-title":"BreastScreen Australia national accreditation standards","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib9","series-title":"Digital mammography quality control manual","author":"Berns","year":"2018"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib10","series-title":"Guidance for breast screening mammographers","year":"2020"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib11","series-title":"European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis","author":"Perry","year":"2006"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2023.02.025","article-title":"The impact of subjective image quality evaluation in mammography","volume":"29","author":"Aluki\u0107","year":"2023","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2015.05.006","article-title":"Comparing the use and interpretation of PGMI scoring to assess the technical quality of screening mammograms in the UK and Norway","volume":"21","author":"Boyce","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1093\/jbi\/wbaa117","article-title":"Variability in mammography quality assessment after implementation of enhancing quality using the inspection program (EQUIP)","volume":"3","author":"Funaro","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Breast Imaging"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carj.2014.02.001","article-title":"Clinical image quality in daily practice of breast cancer mammography screening","volume":"65","author":"Guertin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2015.07.005","article-title":"Mammography image assessment; validity and reliability of current scheme","volume":"21","author":"Hill","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2009.04.069","article-title":"A review of methods of clinical image quality evaluation in mammography. Article","volume":"74","author":"Li","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6498\/ad1cd4","article-title":"Clinical image quality assessment and mean glandular dose for full field digital mammography","author":"Nassar","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Radiol Prot"},{"issue":"1082","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib19","article-title":"A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the craniocaudal projection. Review","volume":"91","author":"Sweeney","year":"2018","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib20","series-title":"Volpara lab user guide (Volpara health Technologies Ltd)","year":"2023"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2019.07.002","article-title":"Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: a six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process","volume":"147","author":"Belton","year":"2019","journal-title":"Technol Forecast Soc Change"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000002887","article-title":"The Delphi method","volume":"95","author":"Humphrey-Murto","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.5662\/wjm.v11.i4.116","article-title":"Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness","volume":"11","author":"Nasa","year":"2021","journal-title":"World J Methodol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib24","first-page":"1","volume":"18","author":"Williamson","year":"2017","journal-title":"The COMET handbook"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib25","first-page":"1","article-title":"Delphi method: strengths and weaknesses","volume":"16","author":"Fink-Hafner","year":"2019","journal-title":"Adv Methodol Stat"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib26","series-title":"RAND methodological guidance for conducting and critically appraising Delphi panels","author":"Khodyakov","year":"2023"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib27","series-title":"CAR practice guidelines and technical standards for breast imaging and intervention","year":"2016"},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1999","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.287085053","article-title":"Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them?","volume":"28","author":"Ayyala","year":"2008","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib29","first-page":"40","article-title":"Mediolateral oblique projection in mammography: use of different angulation for patients with different thorax anatomies","volume":"9","author":"Bedene","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Health Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109464","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2020.109464","article-title":"Development and content validity evaluation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography: a mixed-method study","volume":"134","author":"Boita","year":"2021","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib31","series-title":"European quality assurance scheme for breast cancer services training template for digital breast cancer screening","year":"2021"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib32","unstructured":"European breast cancer guidelines. Organisation of screening programme. (Publications Office of the European Union)."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.190.2.8284372","article-title":"Assessing adequacy of mammographic image quality","volume":"190","author":"Eklund","year":"1994","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.carj.2017.12.003","article-title":"Mammography clinical image quality and the false positive rate in a Canadian breast cancer screening program","volume":"69","author":"Guertin","year":"2018","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-017-0917-3","article-title":"Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening","volume":"19","author":"Holland","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib37","series-title":"TruPGMI: AI for mammography quality improvement, white paper","author":"Johnston Lisa","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib38","series-title":"Pain and discomfort in mammography. Digital mammography: a holistic approach","first-page":"177","author":"Whelehan","year":"2022"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2016.07.004","article-title":"Mammographic image reject rate analysis and cause\u2013a National Maltese Study","volume":"23","author":"Mercieca","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2022.03.002","article-title":"Standardised or individualised X-ray tube angle for mediolateral oblique projection in digital mammography?","volume":"28","author":"Moshina","year":"2022","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib41","first-page":"124","article-title":"Breast cancer detection in Qatar: evaluation of mammography image quality using a standardized assessment tool. Art Meme Sagligi Dergisi\/J Breast","volume":"16","author":"Narayan","year":"2020","journal-title":"Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib42","first-page":"E607","article-title":"Evaluation of the quality of mammographic breast positioning: a quality improvement study","volume":"9","author":"Rouette","year":"2021","journal-title":"Can Med Asso Open Access J"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-017-0550-9","article-title":"Overview of the radiographers\u2019 practice in 65 healthcare centers using digital mammography systems in Portugal","volume":"8","author":"S\u00e1 dos Reis","year":"2017","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1002\/jmrs.400","article-title":"Mammographic compression practices of force- and pressure-standardisation protocol: a scoping review. Review","volume":"67","author":"Serwan","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Med Radiat Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib45","first-page":"713","article-title":"Mammography image quality: model for predicting compliance with posterior nipple line criterion","volume":"80","author":"Spuur","year":"2011","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2018.01.004","article-title":"Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting. Article","volume":"100","author":"Spuur","year":"2018","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1002\/jmrs.404","article-title":"Full-field digital mammography: the \u201830% rule\u2019and influences on visualisation of the pectoralis major muscle on the craniocaudal view of the breast","volume":"67","author":"Strohbach","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Med Radiat Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib48","first-page":"34","article-title":"Effect of compressed breast thickness on average glandular dose (AGD) during screening mammography using full-field digital mammography (FFDM)","volume":"8","author":"Suliman","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Acad"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2017.03.004","article-title":"Mammographic image quality in relation to positioning of the breast: a multicentre international evaluation of the assessment systems currently used, to provide an evidence base for establishing a standardised method of assessment","volume":"23","author":"Taylor","year":"2017","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib50","series-title":"The right focus: manual on mammography positioning technique","author":"van Landsveld-Verhoeven","year":"2015"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"448","DOI":"10.1177\/0969141321998718","article-title":"Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers","volume":"28","author":"Waade","year":"2021","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1177\/08465371211025195","article-title":"Canadian association of radiologists mammography accreditation program\u2014clinical image assessment","volume":"73","author":"Wadden","year":"2022","journal-title":"Can Assoc Radiol J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2021.109747","article-title":"Development and validation of a novel measure of adverse patient positioning in mammography","volume":"140","author":"Whelehan","year":"2021","journal-title":"Europ J Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.radi.2015.02.001","article-title":"Does elevating image receptor increase breast receptor footprint and improve pressure balance?","volume":"21","author":"Smith","year":"2015","journal-title":"Radiography"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib55","series-title":"Digital mammography: a holistic approach","author":"Mercer","year":"2022"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib56","first-page":"868","article-title":"Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening","volume":"186","author":"Entz","year":"2014","journal-title":"R\u00f6fo"},{"issue":"2\u20134","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib57","article-title":"The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection","volume":"37","year":"2007","journal-title":"ICRP Publ 103 Ann"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib58","series-title":"Digital mammography: a holistic approach","first-page":"317","article-title":"Supplementary projections","author":"Kelly","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2020.11.036","article-title":"Effect of the EQUIP initiative on additional images performed at screening mammography: a pilot study","volume":"73","author":"Falcon","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clin Imag"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jradnu.2017.11.006","article-title":"The art of mammography with respect to positioning and compression\u2014a Swedish perspective","volume":"37","author":"Dumky","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Radiol Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-019-0711-0","article-title":"Characterization of radiographers\u2019 mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study","volume":"10","author":"Richli Meystre","year":"2019","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0175781","article-title":"Mammographic compression in Asian women","volume":"12","author":"Lau","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-017-4214-8","article-title":"Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program?","volume":"163","author":"Moshina","year":"2017","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3422-4","article-title":"Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality","volume":"25","author":"Broeders","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib65","series-title":"Digital mammography: a holistic approach","first-page":"295","article-title":"Practical mammography","author":"Mercer","year":"2022"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2014.12.012","article-title":"Mammographic compression\u2013a need for mechanical standardization","volume":"84","author":"Branderhorst","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1118\/1.4812418","article-title":"A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force","volume":"40","author":"de Groot","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.16.17522","article-title":"Mammography positioning standards in the digital era: is the status quo acceptable?","volume":"209","author":"Huppe","year":"2017","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib69","series-title":"Image quality, system optimisation and quality control. Digital mammography","first-page":"233","author":"Szczepura","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib70","first-page":"90","article-title":"Objective and subjective assessment of mammographic positioning quality","author":"Picard","year":"2022","journal-title":"SPIE"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13244-020-00860-z","article-title":"Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists","volume":"11","author":"S\u00e1 dos Reis","year":"2020","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2021210746","article-title":"Added value of prereading screening mammograms for breast cancer by radiologic technologists on early screening outcome","volume":"302","author":"Geertse","year":"2022","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410_bib73","series-title":"Training mammography interpretation","year":"2025"}],"container-title":["Radiography"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1078817426000866?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1078817426000866?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,8]],"date-time":"2026-06-08T23:34:37Z","timestamp":1780961677000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1078817426000866"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["S1078817426000866"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410","relation":{},"ISSN":["1078-8174"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1078-8174","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Image quality standards in digital mammography: A consensus statement","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Radiography","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.radi.2026.103410","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"103410"}}