{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T15:16:18Z","timestamp":1784128578859,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,1]],"date-time":"2012-11-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1351728000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,11]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,21]],"date-time":"2012-07-21T22:01:12Z","timestamp":1342908072000},"page":"466-473","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":46,"title":["Comparable clinical outcomes and live births after single vitrified\u2013warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Guixue","family":"Feng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bo","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hong","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jinhui","family":"Shu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xianyou","family":"Gan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fangrong","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xihe","family":"Deng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1856","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.8.1856","article-title":"Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group","volume":"15","author":"ESHRE","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1976","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg357","article-title":"6. Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation","volume":"18","author":"ESHRE","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049","article-title":"Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers","volume":"83","author":"Barrenetxea","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-011-9551-7","article-title":"Frozen\u2013thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers","volume":"28","author":"Berin","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2381","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.03.066","article-title":"Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"91","author":"Chang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1613","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.06.035","article-title":"Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates","volume":"84","author":"Criniti","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00231-X","article-title":"Perinatal characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies complicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome","volume":"101","author":"Duncombe","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0040","first-page":"838","article-title":"Effects of artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles before vitrification on pregnancy outcome","volume":"45","author":"Feng","year":"2010","journal-title":"Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dml053","article-title":"Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF","volume":"13","author":"Fiddelers","year":"2007","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","article-title":"Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer","volume":"73","author":"Gardner","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh593","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects \u2013 a systematic review","volume":"20","author":"Hansen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e32834874e2","article-title":"Current status of human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation","volume":"23","author":"Herrero","year":"2011","journal-title":"Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2062","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.06.008","article-title":"Cryopreserved human blastocysts after vitrification result in excellent implantation and clinical pregnancy rates","volume":"92","author":"Hong","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-7-99","article-title":"Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification","volume":"7","author":"Kader","year":"2009","journal-title":"Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2007.01584.x","article-title":"Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and postintervention study","volume":"115","author":"Khalaf","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dei298","article-title":"Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis","volume":"21","author":"Kjellberg","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.03.085","article-title":"Children born after assisted fertilization have an increased rate of major congenital anomalies","volume":"84","author":"Klemetti","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60538-X","article-title":"Single fresh and frozen\u2013thawed blastocyst transfer using hyaluronan-rich transfer medium","volume":"15","author":"Korosec","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.08.031","article-title":"Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2\u20133 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study","volume":"81","author":"Levitas","year":"2004","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.01.029","article-title":"Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application","volume":"86","author":"Liebermann","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh672","article-title":"Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"20","author":"Lukassen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.02.077","article-title":"Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of single embryo transfer in the United States","volume":"93","author":"Luke","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0115","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2005","volume":"56","author":"Martin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Natl. Vital Stat. Rep."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep035","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)","volume":"24","author":"Nyboe Andersen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1308","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.03.086","article-title":"In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects","volume":"84","author":"Olson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"592","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.12.088","article-title":"Monozygotic twinning is not increased after single blastocyst transfer compared with single cleavage-stage embryo transfer","volume":"93","author":"Papanikolaou","year":"2010","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001","article-title":"A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates","volume":"88","author":"Ryan","year":"2007","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2097","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh398","article-title":"Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer","volume":"19","author":"Schwarzler","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den150","article-title":"Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection","volume":"23","author":"Shih","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61298-9","article-title":"Vitrification demonstrates significant improvement versus slow freezing of human blastocysts","volume":"11","author":"Stehlik","year":"2005","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.09.023","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer: a 6-year progressive implementation of 784 single blastocyst transfers and the influence of payment method on patient choice","volume":"92","author":"Stillman","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1702","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.05.036","article-title":"Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome","volume":"89","author":"Styer","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.12.051","article-title":"Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study","volume":"84","author":"Takahashi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-009-9321-y","article-title":"A theoretical model for single blastocyst transfer","volume":"26","author":"Teranishi","year":"2009","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61091-7","article-title":"Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification","volume":"12","author":"Vajta","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep042","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF\/ICSI","volume":"24","author":"Veleva","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn045","article-title":"The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Vitthala","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1650","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.12.033","article-title":"Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000","volume":"83","author":"Wang","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1699","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq117","article-title":"Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts","volume":"25","author":"Wikland","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-008-9275-5","article-title":"Clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer; single vs. double transfer","volume":"25","author":"Yanaihara","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60591-3","article-title":"Current aspects of blastocyst cryopreservation","volume":"16","author":"Youssry","year":"2008","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1691","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.01.022","article-title":"Vitrified\u2013warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles\u2013time for a new embryo transfer strategy?","volume":"95","author":"Zhu","year":"2011","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."}],"container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S147264831200452X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S147264831200452X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,22]],"date-time":"2022-01-22T11:09:58Z","timestamp":1642849798000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S147264831200452X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,11]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,11]]}},"alternative-id":["S147264831200452X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.07.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6483","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,11]]}}}