{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T06:36:55Z","timestamp":1780468615256,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,1]],"date-time":"2012-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1354320000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,9,21]],"date-time":"2012-09-21T04:52:37Z","timestamp":1348203157000},"page":"642-648","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: should it be the rule?"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Elisabet","family":"Clua","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rosa","family":"Tur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Buenaventura","family":"Coroleu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Montse","family":"Boada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"I.","family":"Rodr\u00edguez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pedro N.","family":"Barri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Veiga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-7-36","article-title":"Single-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in fresh IVF and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles: a meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Baruffi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0010","first-page":"118","article-title":"Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception","volume":"4","author":"Blake","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cohcrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1292","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh785","article-title":"The couple\u2019s decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer?","volume":"20","author":"Blennborn","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.06.023","article-title":"Analysis of factors associated with multiple pregnancy in an oocyte donation programme","volume":"21","author":"Clua","year":"2010","journal-title":"Reprod. BioMed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0025","first-page":"2658","article-title":"Donor age is a paramount to success in oocyte donation","volume":"16","author":"Cohen","year":"1999","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/15.3.616","article-title":"Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization","volume":"15","author":"Coroleu","year":"2000","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cutting, R., Morroll, D., Roberts, S., Pickering, S., Rutherford, A. (on behalf of the BFS and ACE) 2008. Elective Single Embryo Transfer: guidelines for pratice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologist. Hum. Fertil. 11, 131\u2013146.","DOI":"10.1080\/14647270802302629"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60384-7","article-title":"Factors and perceptions that influence women\u2019s decisions to have a single embryo transferred","volume":"15","author":"De Lacey","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod. BioMed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1851","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq124","article-title":"Assisted reproductive technology in Europe 2006 results generated from European registers by ESHRE","volume":"25","author":"De Mouzon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deh188","article-title":"A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF\/ICSI cycles","volume":"19","author":"Gerris","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.117305","article-title":"Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion","volume":"185","author":"Grobman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.01.007","article-title":"Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No 182, September 2006","volume":"102","author":"JOINT SOGC-CFAS","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg081","article-title":"Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting","volume":"18","author":"Land","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0070","unstructured":"Law 14\/2006 of 26 May, on human assisted reproduction techniques. BOE [Official State Gazette] 126, 27\/05\/2006."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61441-1","article-title":"Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI","volume":"13","author":"Le Lannou","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reprod. BioMed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der469","article-title":"Association between oocyte donation and maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 43 years or older","author":"Le Ray","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60695-5","article-title":"Cumulative impact of adding frozen-thawed cycles to single versus double fresh embryo transfers","volume":"15","author":"Lundin","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod. BioMed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmq028","article-title":"Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer","volume":"17","author":"Maheshwari","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2121","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del121","article-title":"A prospective trial comparing oocyte donor ovarian response and recipient pregnancy rates between suppression with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone and dual suppression with a contraceptive vaginal ring and GnRH","volume":"21","author":"Mart\u00ednez","year":"2006","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590801893331","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, comparative study of leuprorelin+human menopausal gonadotropins versus ganirelix+recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in oocyte donors and pregnancy rates among the corresponding recipients","volume":"24","author":"Mart\u00ednez","year":"2008","journal-title":"Gynecol. Endocrinol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"c6945","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c6945","article-title":"Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials","volume":"341","author":"McLernon","year":"2010","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)01823-4","article-title":"Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: a 3-year retrospective analysis","volume":"76","author":"Noyes","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmh048","article-title":"Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction \u2013 the Belgian project","volume":"11","author":"Ombelet","year":"2005","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg145","article-title":"Attitudes of IVF\/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer","volume":"18","author":"Pinborg","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2009.01135.x","article-title":"Blastocyst embryo transfer is the primary determinant for improved outcomes in oocyte donation cycles","volume":"26","author":"Porat","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.08.053","article-title":"Guidelines on number of embryos transferred","volume":"90","author":"Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0135","unstructured":"Real Decreto 1301\/2006 de 10 de Noviembre. BOE n\u00fam 270, 11\/11\/2006, Anexo IV, Selecci\u00f3n y evaluaci\u00f3n del donante de c\u00e9lulas reproductoras. 39493\u201339494."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1043","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/154.11.1043","article-title":"Risk of multiple birth associated with in vitro fertilization using donor eggs","volume":"154","author":"Reynolds","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am. J. Epidemiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)00572-7","article-title":"Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?","volume":"80","author":"Reynolds","year":"2003","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0145","first-page":"405","article-title":"Marco de actitud ante las gestaciones m\u00faltiples: Legislaciones y recomendaciones","volume":"24","author":"Ricciarelli","year":"2007","journal-title":"Rev. Iberoam. de Fert. y Reprod. Hum."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.3109\/09513590.2011.633662","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer and cumulative pregnancy rate: five-year experience in a Southern European Country","volume":"28","author":"Rodr\u00edguez","year":"2012","journal-title":"Gynecol. Endocrinol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00685-3","article-title":"Blastocyst culture and transfer increases the efficiency of oocyte donation","volume":"74","author":"Schoolcraft","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2636","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.10.2636","article-title":"Factors influencing the obstetric and perinatal outcome after oocyte donation","volume":"17","author":"Sheffer-Mimouni","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2500","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep238","article-title":"The aged uterus: multifetal pregnancy outcome after ovum donation in older women","volume":"24","author":"Simchen","year":"2009","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0170","unstructured":"SEF (Sociedad Espa\u00f1ola de Fertilidad) registry statistics (www.registrosef.com). SEF registro 2008. <http:\/\/www.registrosef.com>."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"428","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60369-0","article-title":"Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation","volume":"15","author":"S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m-Anttila","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod. BioMed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.2.483","article-title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcome after oocyte donation-comparison with in vitro fertilization pregnancies","volume":"13","author":"S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m-Anttila","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1858","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg384","article-title":"Elective single embryo transfer yields good delivery rates in oocyte donation","volume":"18","author":"S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m-Anttila","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2392","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa041032","article-title":"Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization","volume":"351","author":"Thurin","year":"2004","journal-title":"N. Engl. J. Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"856","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61035-8","article-title":"Prevention of multiple pregnancy following IVF in Spain","volume":"13","author":"Tur","year":"2006","journal-title":"Reprod. BioMed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmq017","article-title":"Clinical and immunologic aspects of egg donation pregnancies: a systematic review","volume":"16","author":"Van der Hoorn","year":"2010","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pog.2010.03.007","article-title":"Influencia de la edad y de las t\u00e9cnicas de reproducci\u00f3n asistida en nuestros resultados obst\u00e9tricos y perinatales","volume":"53","author":"Vazquez","year":"2010","journal-title":"Prog. Obstet. Ginecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136542","article-title":"Pregnancy after the replacement of a frozen\u2013thawed embryo with less than 50% intact blastomeres","volume":"2","author":"Veiga","year":"1987","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008_b0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der359","article-title":"Donor age is a major determinant of success of oocyte donation\/recipient programme","volume":"27","author":"Wang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."}],"container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648312005391?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648312005391?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,29]],"date-time":"2022-01-29T12:41:51Z","timestamp":1643460111000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1472648312005391"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S1472648312005391"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.09.008","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6483","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12]]}}}