{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T11:38:59Z","timestamp":1767008339351},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,10,1]],"date-time":"2015-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1443657600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","rbmojournal.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,16]],"date-time":"2015-07-16T15:11:19Z","timestamp":1437059479000},"page":"557-564","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Intra- and inter-observer variability of uterine measurements with three-dimensional ultrasound and implications for clinical practice"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Sotirios H.","family":"Saravelos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tin-Chiu","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)59942-7","article-title":"The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions","volume":"49","author":"American Fertility Society","year":"1988","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7551","article-title":"Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"35","author":"Bermejo","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","article-title":"Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement","volume":"1","author":"Bland","year":"1986","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1744-6570.1963.tb01283.x","article-title":"A new view of interobserver agreement","volume":"16","author":"Burdock","year":"1963","journal-title":"Pers. Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"761","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr028","article-title":"The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review","volume":"17","author":"Chan","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib9010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2011.08.724","article-title":"Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"19","author":"Faivre","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.01.025","article-title":"No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study","volume":"24","author":"Gergolet","year":"2012","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/7.2.161","article-title":"Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results","volume":"7","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2032","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det098","article-title":"The ESHRE\/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies","volume":"28","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu002","article-title":"Reply: are the ESHRE\/ESGE criteria of female genital anomalies for diagnosis of septate uterus appropriate?","volume":"29","author":"Grimbizis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu344","article-title":"Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice","volume":"30","author":"Ludwin","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu001","article-title":"Are the ESHRE\/ESGE criteria of female genital anomalies for diagnosis of septate uterus appropriate?","volume":"29","author":"Ludwin","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60876-0","article-title":"Is hysteroscopic correction of an incomplete uterine septum justified prior to IVF?","volume":"14","author":"Ozgur","year":"2007","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.127","article-title":"Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"21","author":"Salim","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn018","article-title":"Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal","volume":"14","author":"Saravelos","year":"2008","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod. Update"},{"issue":"f1630","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0080","first-page":"1","article-title":"Limits of agreement (Bland-Altman method)","volume":"346","author":"Sedgwick","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2331020777","article-title":"Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues","volume":"233","author":"Troiano","year":"2004","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11490","article-title":"Interobserver variability in the ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies","volume":"40","author":"Van Schoubroeck","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.09.006","article-title":"Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies","volume":"29","author":"Venetis","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"}],"container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648315003600?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648315003600?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,20]],"date-time":"2018-09-20T22:55:22Z","timestamp":1537484122000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1472648315003600"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S1472648315003600"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6483","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Intra- and inter-observer variability of uterine measurements with three-dimensional ultrasound and implications for clinical practice","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Reproductive BioMedicine Online","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.024","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}