{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T13:58:39Z","timestamp":1785851919148,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559347200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Nature Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["81571397"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81571397"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Nature Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["31770989"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["31770989"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Nature Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["81701523"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81701523"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.com.au","rbmojournal.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,23]],"date-time":"2018-12-23T11:55:03Z","timestamp":1545566103000},"page":"892-900","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Live birth rate and neonatal outcome following cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus blastocyst transfer using the freeze-all strategy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Qianqian","family":"Zhu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jing","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yun","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bian","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ningling","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mingru","family":"Yin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suqun","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qifeng","family":"Lyu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yanping","family":"Kuang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18942","article-title":"Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"51","author":"Alviggi","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obst Gyn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.05.024","article-title":"Are We Ready to Eliminate the Transfer of Fresh Embryos in IVF?","volume":"102","author":"Barnhart","year":"2014","journal-title":"FErtil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0003","unstructured":"Brugnon, F., Bouraoui, Z., Ouchchane, L., Gremeau, A.S., Peikrishvili, R., Pouly, J.L., Janny, L., 2010. Cumulative pregnancy rates after single cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a randomized and prospective study, Meeting of Eshre, pp. I60-I61."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1513873","article-title":"Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome","volume":"375","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"New Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01133388","article-title":"A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality","volume":"3","author":"Cummins","year":"1986","journal-title":"J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu001","article-title":"Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Dar","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des448","article-title":"Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies after blastocyst versus Day 3 embryo transfer: Canadian ART Register (CARTR) analysis","volume":"28","author":"Dar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu286","article-title":"The type of culture medium and the duration of in vitro culture do not influence birthweight of ART singletons","volume":"30","author":"De Vos","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2442","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew219","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle","volume":"31","author":"De Vos","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2593","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der251","article-title":"An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment","volume":"26","author":"Devroey","year":"2011","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20170048","article-title":"Fresh embryos versus freeze-all embryos - transfer strategies: Nuances of a meta-analysis","volume":"21","author":"Dieamant","year":"2017","journal-title":"Jbra Assisted Reproduction"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu027","article-title":"Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence","volume":"20","author":"Evans","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-014-0387-9","article-title":"Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results","volume":"32","author":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Shaw","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1130","article-title":"Risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer: a large population study using contemporary registry data from Australia and New Zealand","volume":"104","author":"Georgina","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0015","first-page":"371","article-title":"Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study","volume":"214","author":"Ginstr\u00e3","year":"2016","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0016","first-page":"D2118","article-title":"Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology","author":"Glujovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Db Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"857","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2017.1332175","article-title":"Blastocyst transfer is not associated with increased unfavorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer","volume":"33","author":"Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2561","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew244","article-title":"Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"31","author":"Martins","year":"2016","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17327","article-title":"Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes","volume":"49","author":"Martins","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-014-0391-0","article-title":"Freeze-all policy: is it time for that?","volume":"32","author":"Roque","year":"2015","journal-title":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003","article-title":"Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"99","author":"Roque","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertility & Sterility"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-017-0255-4","article-title":"Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"Reproductive Biology & Endocrinology Rb & E"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2013.04.006","article-title":"Blastocyst culture and cryopreservation to optimize clinical outcomes of warming cycles","volume":"27","author":"Zhu","year":"2013","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey044","article-title":"Live birth rates in the first complete IVF cycle among 20 687 women using a freeze-all strategy","volume":"33","author":"Zhu","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648318306631?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648318306631?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,23]],"date-time":"2019-05-23T09:57:04Z","timestamp":1558605424000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1472648318306631"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S1472648318306631"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6483","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Live birth rate and neonatal outcome following cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus blastocyst transfer using the freeze-all strategy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Reproductive BioMedicine Online","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.034","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}