{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T15:08:04Z","timestamp":1787843284935,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,1]],"date-time":"2021-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","rbmojournal.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,22]],"date-time":"2021-04-22T19:36:36Z","timestamp":1619120196000},"page":"197-204","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Impact of previous Caesarean section on reproductive outcomes after assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analyses"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Jing","family":"Zhao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Hao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bin","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yonggang","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yanping","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2009.02.019","article-title":"Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium","volume":"106","author":"Ben-Nagi","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.02.007","article-title":"Coelho Lopes RG. Findings in patients with postmenstrual spotting with prior Cesarean section","volume":"17","author":"Borges","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.028","article-title":"Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery","volume":"205","author":"Clark","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-200295040-00012","article-title":"Uterine rupture and dehiscence: ten-year review and case-control study","volume":"95","author":"Diaz","year":"2002","journal-title":"South Med. J."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2569","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu197","article-title":"Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility","volume":"29","author":"Evers","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/362518","article-title":"Prelabour caesarean section following IVF\/ICSI in older-term nulliparous women: too precious to push?","volume":"2011","author":"Gillet","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Pregnancy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2007.10.004","article-title":"Resectoscopic correction of the \u2018isthmocele\u2019 in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility","volume":"15","author":"Gubbini","year":"2008","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2010.10.011","article-title":"Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: prospective study","volume":"18","author":"Gubbini","year":"2011","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1943","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det130","article-title":"Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"28","author":"Gurol-Urganci","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu057","article-title":"A population-based cohort study of the effect of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility","volume":"29","author":"Gurol-Urganci","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-3016.1996.tb00062.x","article-title":"Impact of Caesarean section on future pregnancy \u2013 a review of cohort studies","volume":"10","author":"Hemminki","year":"1996","journal-title":"Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)48491-8","article-title":"Cesarean section and subsequent fertility: results from the 1982 National Survey of Family Growth","volume":"43","author":"Hemminki","year":"1985","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0013","first-page":"0","article-title":"Effect of a prior cesarean delivery on pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study in a freeze-all setting","author":"Huang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4160-4","article-title":"Caesarean section and its impact on fertility and time to a subsequent pregnancy in Germany: a database analysis in gynecological practices","volume":"294","author":"Jacob","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch. Gynecol. Obstet."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002494","article-title":"Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"15","author":"Keag","year":"2018","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3349","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det343","article-title":"First birth Caesarean section and subsequent fertility: a population-based study in the USA, 2000\u20132008","volume":"28","author":"Kjerulff","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.18663","article-title":"Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008\u20132014","volume":"317","author":"Li","year":"2017","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement","volume":"4","author":"Moher","year":"2015","journal-title":"Syst. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1914","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.7.1914","article-title":"The relationship between Caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies","volume":"17","author":"Murphy","year":"2002","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.11133","article-title":"Does the presence of a Cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study","volume":"40","author":"Naji","year":"2012","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1489","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det110","article-title":"Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?","volume":"28","author":"Naji","year":"2013","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-165","article-title":"Caesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"13","author":"O'Neill","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2560","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu217","article-title":"Does a Caesarean section increase the time to a second live birth? A register-based cohort study","volume":"29","author":"O'Neill","year":"2014","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045","article-title":"Impact of a prior cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: a prospective study","volume":"106","author":"Patounakis","year":"2016","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1983","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deg402","article-title":"Does Caesarean section cause infertility?","volume":"18","author":"Porter","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wombi.2019.05.005","article-title":"Giving birth after caesarean: identifying shared preferences among pregnant women using Q methodology","volume":"33","author":"Rietveld","year":"2020","journal-title":"Women and Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1007\/s10396-015-0678-5","article-title":"Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars","volume":"43","author":"Ryo","year":"2016","journal-title":"J. Med. Ultrason."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31930-5","article-title":"Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children","volume":"392","author":"Sandall","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.03.006","article-title":"Delivery after previous cesarean: long-term maternal outcomes","volume":"34","author":"Silver","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin. Perinatol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1289","article-title":"First cesarean birth and subsequent fertility","volume":"85","author":"Smith","year":"2006","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182704880","article-title":"Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop","volume":"120","author":"Spong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","article-title":"Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology","volume":"283","author":"Stroup","year":"2000","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1363","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12738","article-title":"New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect","volume":"41","author":"Tanimura","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000292089.18717.9f","article-title":"Reduced fertility after cesarean delivery","volume":"110","author":"Toll\u00e5nes","year":"2007","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2013.03.008","article-title":"Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications","volume":"20","author":"Tower","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0037","first-page":"1","article-title":"Previous caesarean section is associated with lower subsequent in vitro fertilization live birth rates","volume":"0","author":"van del Tweel","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum. Fertil."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez295","article-title":"Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"35","author":"Vissers","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6405","article-title":"Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position","volume":"34","author":"Wang","year":"2009","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.12.004","article-title":"Fertility outcomes of IVF\/ICSI after Caesarean section: a cohort study","volume":"40","author":"Wang","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0041","first-page":"922","article-title":"Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section undergoing in vitro fertilization: a retrospective case\u2013control study","volume":"37","author":"Wang","year":"2017","journal-title":"J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol\u2013Med. Sci."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007_bib0042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3288","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.900581","article-title":"Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patient with previous cesarean scar","volume":"22","author":"Zhang","year":"2016","journal-title":"Med. Sci. Monit."}],"container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648321001838?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648321001838?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T08:21:43Z","timestamp":1761466903000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1472648321001838"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S1472648321001838"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6483","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Impact of previous Caesarean section on reproductive outcomes after assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analyses","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Reproductive BioMedicine Online","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.007","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}