{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T23:03:40Z","timestamp":1772147020763,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,1]],"date-time":"2024-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706745600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,1]],"date-time":"2024-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706745600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","rbmojournal.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,14]],"date-time":"2023-10-14T19:34:31Z","timestamp":1697312071000},"page":"103619","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"48","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5097-4917","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna","family":"Vanderhoff","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Lanes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kathryn","family":"Go","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lori","family":"Dobson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth","family":"Ginsburg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jay","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Serene S.","family":"Srouji","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E427","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1241","article-title":"Impact of blastocyst biopsy technique on DNA quality and PGT-A results","volume":"114","author":"Abeyta","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2016.1232892","article-title":"Comparason of the result of preimplantation genetic screening obtained by a-CGH and NGS methods from the same embryos","volume":"32","author":"Aleksandrova","year":"2016","journal-title":"Gynaecol. Endocrinol."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.11.019","article-title":"Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negative affect IVF outcomes","volume":"42","author":"Aluko","year":"2020","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online."},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02066424","article-title":"Pregnancy achieved with pronuclear-stage embryos that were cryopreserved and thawed twice: a case report","volume":"13","author":"Baker","year":"1996","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.10.010","article-title":"Reproductive genetics laboratory may impact euploid blastocyst and live birth rates: a comparison of 4 national laboratories\u2019 PGT-A results from vitrified donor oocytes","volume":"119","author":"Bardos","year":"2023","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.09.013","article-title":"Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes","volume":"108","author":"Bradley","year":"2017","journal-title":"Feril. Steril."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.07.114","article-title":"No diagnosis\u201d embryos after PGS should not be discarded: rebiopsy and reanalysis demonstrate the majority are euploid","volume":"102","author":"Brower","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0008","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Assisted Reproductive Technology Manual, 2017. 17(2), 105-16."},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey282","article-title":"Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience","volume":"33","author":"Cimadomo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004295","article-title":"Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a review of the evidence","volume":"137","author":"Dahdough","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet. Gynecol."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2488","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa236","article-title":"Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children","volume":"35","author":"De Vos","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.2.337","article-title":"Successful pregnancy following replacement of embryos previously refrozen at blastocyst stage: a case report","volume":"16","author":"Farhat","year":"2001","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056","article-title":"In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"100","author":"Forman","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.12.017","article-title":"Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles","volume":"109","author":"Friedenthal","year":"2018","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0015","article-title":"Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis","volume":"2017","author":"Gallos","year":"2017","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.06.028","article-title":"Pregnancy potential and perinatal outcomes of embryos cryopreserved twice: a case-control study","volume":"43","author":"Hallamaa","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online"},{"issue":"6288","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1038\/344768a0","article-title":"Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification","volume":"344","author":"Handyside","year":"1990","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.07.869","article-title":"Rebiopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) reanalysis demonstrate the majority of originally \u201cno diagnosis\u201d embryos are euploid with comparable pregnancy rates","volume":"104","author":"Kaing","year":"2015","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.11.079","article-title":"The efficacy of the transfer of twice frozen-thawed embryos with the vitrification method","volume":"91","author":"Kumasako","year":"2009","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"11","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3165","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.11.3165","article-title":"The effect of multiple cryopreservation procedures and blastomere biopsy in the in-vitro development of mouse embryos","volume":"13","author":"Ludwig","year":"1998","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2103","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01550-6","article-title":"When next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) yields an inconclusive report: diagnostic results and clinical outcomes after re biopsy","volume":"36","author":"Neal","year":"2019","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0022","first-page":"e290","article-title":"Re-biopsied pgs embryos yield actionable results","volume":"108","author":"Neitzel","year":"2017","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0024","first-page":"119","article-title":"Consistency in rates of diagnosis of embryonic mosaicism, segmental abnormalities, and \u201cno call\u201d results among experienced embryologists performing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy","volume":"1","author":"Osman","year":"2020","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril. Reports."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02078-4","article-title":"Utilization of preimplantation genetic testing in the USA","volume":"38","author":"Roche","year":"2021","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.5653\/cerm.2016.43.3.181","article-title":"Live birth in a woman with recurrent implantation failure and adenomyosis following transfer of refrozen-warmed embryos","volume":"43","author":"Safari","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039","article-title":"Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical Trial","volume":"100","author":"Scott","year":"2013","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.07.953","article-title":"Live birth of a healthy baby after a frozen embryo transfer with blastocysts that were frozen and thawed twice","volume":"83","author":"Smith","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01204361","article-title":"Cryopreserved mouse embryos can successfully survive biopsy and refreezing","volume":"10","author":"Snabes","year":"1993","journal-title":"J. Assist. Reprod. Genet."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.03.001","article-title":"Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer","volume":"29","author":"Taylor","year":"2014","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.07.052","article-title":"A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using targeted next generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy","volume":"115","author":"Tiegs","year":"2021","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/12.2.310","article-title":"In-vitro development of refrozen mouse embryos","volume":"12","author":"Vitale","year":"1997","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0033","first-page":"223","article-title":"Thaw, Biopsy and refreeze strategy for PGT-A on previously cryopreserved embryos","volume":"11","author":"Wilding","year":"2019","journal-title":"Facts. Views. Vis. OBGYN."},{"issue":"7","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0034","article-title":"Selection of competent blastocysts for transfer by combining time-lapse monitoring and array CGH testing for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic screening: a prospective study with sibling oocytes","volume":"38","author":"Yang","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Medical Genom"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1641","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.09.018","article-title":"Blastocysts can be rebiopsied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening","volume":"102","author":"Zhang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619_bib0036","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.006","article-title":"Complex mosaic blastocysts after preimplantation genetic testing: prevalence and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification","volume":"43","author":"Zhou","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod. Biomed. Online."}],"container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648323007186?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648323007186?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T08:28:47Z","timestamp":1761467327000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1472648323007186"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"alternative-id":["S1472648323007186"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6483","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Reproductive BioMedicine Online","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2023 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"103619"}}