{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T23:59:01Z","timestamp":1790639941098,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]],"date-time":"2026-05-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779840000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","rbmojournal.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T16:20:06Z","timestamp":1779812406000},"page":"105796","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparable live births for single vitrified blastocyst transfer from day 5 compared with day 6: a retrospective analysis"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"53","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-6766-9305","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giorgia","family":"Carullo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Samia","family":"El-Hadad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Min","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ana Velasco","family":"Gil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Natalia Cervantes","family":"Gomez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6143-3553","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sofia","family":"Makieva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brigitte","family":"Leeners","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0001","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02380-1","article-title":"Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?","volume":"39","author":"Abdala","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049","article-title":"Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: A comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers","volume":"83","author":"Barrenetxea","year":"2005","journal-title":"Fertility and Sterility"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0003","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1948","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez163","article-title":"Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes","volume":"34","author":"Bourdon","year":"2019","journal-title":"Human Reproduction"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-10-33","article-title":"GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction cycles: oocyte morphology","volume":"10","author":"Cota","year":"2012","journal-title":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology"},{"issue":"10","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9837-4","article-title":"Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6","volume":"29","author":"Eman","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-025-07965-0","article-title":"The effect of endometriosis on oocyte quality: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment","author":"Fan","year":"2025","journal-title":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00518-5","article-title":"Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer","author":"Gardner","year":"2000","journal-title":"Fertility and Sterility"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002118.pub5","article-title":"Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology","author":"Glujovsky","year":"2016","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"12","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0818-x","article-title":"Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6","volume":"33","author":"Haas","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.08.340","article-title":"Ovarian stimulation protocols: impact on oocyte and endometrial quality and function","author":"Harvey","year":"2025","journal-title":"Fertility and Sterility"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e3283297dd6","article-title":"Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?","volume":"21","author":"Kolibianakis","year":"2009","journal-title":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7827-7-103","article-title":"Impact of GnRH analogues on oocyte\/embryo quality and embryo development in in vitro fertilization\/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a case control study","volume":"7","author":"Murber","year":"2009","journal-title":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.112384","article-title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes following vitrified warmed day 5\/6 blastocyst transfers using solid surface methodology with fresh blastocyst transfers","volume":"6","author":"Muthukumar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2020.00499","article-title":"Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching","volume":"11","author":"Park","year":"2020","journal-title":"Frontiers in Endocrinology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0015","series-title":"R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing","year":"2024"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fcell.2023.1092994","article-title":"Higher miscarriage rate in subfertile women with endometriosis receiving unbiopsied frozen-warmed single blastocyst transfers","volume":"11","author":"Sachs","year":"2023","journal-title":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092","article-title":"Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony","volume":"89","author":"Shapiro","year":"2008","journal-title":"Fertility and Sterility"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2022.1066757","article-title":"Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher in high-grade day 6 blastocysts than in low-grade day 5 blastocysts","volume":"13","author":"Shi","year":"2023","journal-title":"Frontiers in Endocrinology"},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1906","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq143","article-title":"The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"25","author":"Sunkara","year":"2010","journal-title":"Human Reproduction"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew358","article-title":"Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen\u2013thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols","author":"Toftager","year":"2017","journal-title":"Human Reproduction"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-022-02397-0","article-title":"Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results","volume":"39","author":"Tong","year":"2022","journal-title":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0022","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.23634","article-title":"Absolute Risk of Adverse Obstetric Outcomes Among Twin Pregnancies After In Vitro Fertilization by Maternal Age","volume":"4","author":"Wang","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Network Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2023.03.005","article-title":"Comparison of clinical outcome between day 5 and day 6 single blastocyst transfers in cycles undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy","volume":"62","author":"Wu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-022-07013-1","article-title":"Prolonging the time of progesterone supplementation to improve the pregnancy outcomes of single day 6 blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial","volume":"23","author":"Xu","year":"2022","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0578.2008.00203.x","article-title":"Elective cryopreservation of all day 5 blastocysts is more effective than using day 6 blastocysts for improving pregnancy outcome in stimulated cycles","volume":"7","author":"Yamamoto","year":"2008","journal-title":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s11596-023-2699-4","article-title":"Pregnancy Outcomes for Day 5 Versus Day 6 Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer with Different Qualities of Embryos: A Large Matched-cohort Study","volume":"43","author":"Yu","year":"2023","journal-title":"Current Medical Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0027","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20190050","article-title":"Effect of GnRH analogues for pituitary suppression on oocyte morphology in repeated ovarian stimulation cycles","author":"Zanetti","year":"2019","journal-title":"JBRA Assisted Reproduction"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.02.030","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed day 5 blastocyst transfers compared to vitrified-warmed day 6 blastocyst transfers: A meta analysis","volume":"247","author":"Zeng","year":"2020","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796_bib0029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.5653\/cerm.2022.05540","article-title":"The pregnancy outcomes of day-5 poor-quality and day-6 high-quality blastocysts in single blastocyst transfer cycles","volume":"50","author":"Zhang","year":"2023","journal-title":"Daehan Saengsik Uihak Hoeji\/Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine"}],"container-title":["Reproductive BioMedicine Online"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648326003378?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1472648326003378?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T23:04:08Z","timestamp":1790636648000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1472648326003378"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S1472648326003378"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6483"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6483","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparable live births for single vitrified blastocyst transfer from day 5 compared with day 6: a retrospective analysis","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Reproductive BioMedicine Online","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2026.105796","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"105796"}}