{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T19:22:36Z","timestamp":1778613756734,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,11,8]],"date-time":"2013-11-08T01:46:26Z","timestamp":1383875186000},"page":"70-78","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Objectivity in confirmation: Post hoc monsters and novel predictions"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"45","author":[{"given":"Ioannis","family":"Votsis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0005","series-title":"The paradox of predictivism","author":"Barnes","year":"2008"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0010","series-title":"The aim and structure of physical theory","author":"Duhem","year":"1991"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00357583","article-title":"Einstein and Hilbert: Two months in the history of general relativity","volume":"19","author":"Earman","year":"1978","journal-title":"Archive for History of Exact Sciences"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0020","unstructured":"Glymour, C. (2008). The paradox of predictivism (book review). Notre Dame philosophical reviews, <http:\/\/ndpr.nd.edu\/news\/23561-the-paradox-of-predictivism\/>."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0025","series-title":"Fact, fiction and forecast","author":"Goodman","year":"1983"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/axn017","article-title":"On the predilections for predictions","volume":"59","author":"Harker","year":"2008","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/55.1.1","article-title":"Prediction versus accommodation and the risk of overfitting","volume":"55","author":"Hitchcock","year":"2004","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0040","series-title":"The problem of inductive logic","first-page":"315","article-title":"Changes in the problem of inductive logic","author":"Lakatos","year":"1968"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/52.3.575","article-title":"The apparent superiority of prediction to accommodation as a side effect: A reply to Maher","volume":"52","author":"Lange","year":"2001","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.2307\/2026601","article-title":"Empirical equivalence and underdetermination","volume":"88","author":"Laudan","year":"1991","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0055","series-title":"A novel defense of scientific realism","author":"Leplin","year":"1997"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0060","first-page":"273","article-title":"Prediction, accommodation, and the logic of discovery","volume":"Vol. 1","author":"Maher","year":"1988"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0065","series-title":"Error and growth of experimental knowledge","author":"Mayo","year":"1996"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/25.1.1","article-title":"Logical versus historical theories of confirmation","volume":"25","author":"Musgrave","year":"1974","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00388295","article-title":"Relevant deduction: From solving paradoxes towards a general theory","volume":"35","author":"Schurz","year":"1991","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-009-9614-9","article-title":"Data meet theory: Up close and inferentially personal","volume":"182","author":"Votsis","year":"2011","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0080","series-title":"Philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history","author":"Whewell","year":"1847"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0085","series-title":"In defence of objective Bayesianism","author":"Williamson","year":"2010"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0100","series-title":"Change and progress in modern science","first-page":"301","article-title":"Scientific discovery and theory confirmation","author":"Worrall","year":"1985"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0105","series-title":"In the scope of logic, methodology and philosophy of science","first-page":"191","article-title":"New evidence for old","author":"Worrall","year":"2002"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2005.08.007","article-title":"Prediction and the \u2018periodic law\u2019: A rejoinder to Barnes","volume":"36","author":"Worrall","year":"2005","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0095","series-title":"Rationality and reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave","first-page":"31","article-title":"Theory-confirmation and history","author":"Worrall","year":"2006"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009_b0110","article-title":"Why did Einstein\u2019s programme supersede Lorentz\u2019s? (Part I and II)","volume":"24","author":"Zahar","year":"1973","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"}],"container-title":["Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0039368113001052?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0039368113001052?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,6]],"date-time":"2023-07-06T08:34:00Z","timestamp":1688632440000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0039368113001052"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["S0039368113001052"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-3681"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-3681","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Objectivity in confirmation: Post hoc monsters and novel predictions","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.10.009","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}