{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T04:56:42Z","timestamp":1790657802246,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790812800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785110400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001828","name":"Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001828","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Social Science & Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T23:37:04Z","timestamp":1784763424000},"page":"119614","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"special_numbering":"C","title":["Are public preferences over health distributions guided by principles of distribution? A social choice experiment"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"406","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-9303-5280","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maartje","family":"Tromm","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8722-3431","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vivian","family":"Reckers-Droog","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4558-7637","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew","family":"Robson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib1","series-title":"Achieving Justice: Comparative Public Opinions on Income Distribution","author":"Aalberg","year":"2003"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-024-01154-5","article-title":"Health equity and distributive justice: views of high-level African policymakers","volume":"25","author":"Amri","year":"2024","journal-title":"BMC Med. Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1086\/233897","article-title":"What is the point of equality?","volume":"109","author":"Anderson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00646210","article-title":"Equality and equal opportunity for welfare","volume":"56","author":"Arneson","year":"1989","journal-title":"Philos. Stud."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2021.113892","article-title":"Public values and plurality in health priority setting: what to do when people disagree and why we should care about reasons as well as choices","volume":"277","author":"Baker","year":"2021","journal-title":"Soc. Sci. Med."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib6","series-title":"An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation","author":"Bentham","year":"1996"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1215\/03616878-2010-033","article-title":"Public values, health inequality, and alternative notions of a \u201cfair\u201d response","volume":"35","author":"Blacksher","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Health Polit. Pol. Law"},{"issue":"7013","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.311.7013.1155","article-title":"Consulting the public about health service priorities","volume":"311","author":"Bowie","year":"1995","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"287","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0013-0427.2005.00421.x","article-title":"Are people inequality-averse, or just risk-averse?","volume":"72","author":"Carlsson","year":"2005","journal-title":"Economica"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1108\/14777261211238954","article-title":"Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework","volume":"26","author":"Clark","year":"2012","journal-title":"J. Health Organisat. Manag."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-8510(99)00043-3","article-title":"Public views on health care rationing: a group discussion study","volume":"49","author":"Cookson","year":"1999","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.26.5.323","article-title":"Principles of justice in health care rationing","volume":"26","author":"Cookson","year":"2000","journal-title":"J. Med. Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1007\/s10198-023-01597-4","article-title":"Self-interest, positional concerns and distributional considerations in healthcare preferences","volume":"25","author":"Daniel","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eur. J. Health Econ."},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x","article-title":"Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?","volume":"31","author":"Deutsch","year":"1975","journal-title":"J. Soc. Issues"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib15","series-title":"Sovereign Virtue: the Theory and Practice of Equality","author":"Dworkin","year":"2000"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2015.10.005","article-title":"Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: a systematic review of what counts and to what extent","volume":"146","author":"Gu","year":"2015","journal-title":"Soc. Sci. Med."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1136\/jme-2022-108702","article-title":"Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting: the relevance and roles of empirical studies exploring public values","volume":"51","author":"Gustavsson","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Med. Ethics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib18","series-title":"The Health of Nations: Public Opinion and the Making of American and British Health Policy","author":"Jacobs","year":"1993"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeoa.2024.100518","article-title":"Aging populations and expenditures on health","volume":"29","author":"Kallestrup-Lamb","year":"2024","journal-title":"The Journal of the Economics of Ageing"},{"issue":"277","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0335.t01-1-00269","article-title":"Inequality aversion versus risk aversion","volume":"70","author":"Kroll","year":"2003","journal-title":"Economica"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib21","series-title":"The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017)","article-title":"Distributive justice","author":"Lamont","year":"2017"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1086\/293210","article-title":"Equity versus efficiency: the elusive trade-off","volume":"100","author":"Le Grand","year":"1990","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"9","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1116","DOI":"10.1080\/10810730.2013.768724","article-title":"Public views about health causation, attributions of responsibility, and inequality","volume":"18","author":"Lundell","year":"2013","journal-title":"J. Health Commun."},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"849","DOI":"10.1215\/03616878-2010-032","article-title":"Playing fair: fairness beliefs and health policy preferences in the United States","volume":"35","author":"Lynch","year":"2010","journal-title":"J. Health Polit. Pol. Law"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib25","series-title":"Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior","first-page":"105","author":"McFadden","year":"1974"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib26","series-title":"Utilitarianism","author":"Mill","year":"2001"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1086\/293425","article-title":"Distributive justice: what the people think","volume":"102","author":"Miller","year":"1992","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib28","series-title":"Principles of Social Justice","author":"Miller","year":"1999"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib29","series-title":"Our Principles","year":"2024"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib30","series-title":"New Health Technologies: Managing Access, Value and Sustainability","year":"2017"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-019-00363-0","article-title":"Systematic review of public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: principles of distributive justice","volume":"12","author":"Oedingen","year":"2019","journal-title":"The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib32","series-title":"Deprivation and the Impact on Smoking Prevalence, England and Wales: 2017 to 2021","year":"2023"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib33","series-title":"A Theory of Justice (Rev. Ed., 5.-6. Printing)","author":"Rawls","year":"2003"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1080\/20016689.2018.1557981","article-title":"Health technology assessment (HTA) and economic evaluation: efficiency or fairness first","volume":"7","author":"Richardson","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal of Market Access & Health Policy"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1007\/s10888-025-09702-8","article-title":"Do social preferences explain health inequality aversion?","volume":"23","author":"Robson","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Econ. Inequal."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhealeco.2025.103018","article-title":"Responsibility-sensitive welfare weights for health","volume":"102","author":"Robson","year":"2025","journal-title":"J. Health Econ."},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3310\/hta5050","article-title":"Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques","volume":"5","author":"Ryan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Health Technol. Assess."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1186\/s40900-021-00289-8","article-title":"The value of involving patients and public in health services research and evaluation: a qualitative study","volume":"7","author":"Saini","year":"2021","journal-title":"Research Involvement and Engagement"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib39","series-title":"The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers","author":"Saldana","year":"2015"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib40","series-title":"Inequality Reexamined","author":"Sen","year":"1995"},{"issue":"5","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.17269\/s41997-018-0128-4","article-title":"Is \u2018health equity\u2019 bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers\u2019 perspectives","volume":"109","author":"Smith","year":"2018","journal-title":"Can. J. Public Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1007\/s11211-020-00354-9","article-title":"Differentiated distributive justice preferences? Configurations of preferences for equality, equity and need in three welfare domains","volume":"33","author":"Van Hootegem","year":"2020","journal-title":"Soc. Justice Res."},{"issue":"8","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib43","first-page":"236","article-title":"Equity, equality, and need: a qualitative study into teachers' professional trade-offs in justifying their differentiation practice","volume":"9","author":"Vijfeijken","year":"2021","journal-title":"Open J. Soc. Sci."},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/0167-6296(91)90015-F","article-title":"QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off","volume":"10","author":"Wagstaff","year":"1991","journal-title":"J. Health Econ."},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-014-0063-2","article-title":"A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting","volume":"7","author":"Whitty","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Patient"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib46","first-page":"1863","article-title":"Chapter 35 equity in health","volume":"vol. 1","author":"Williams","year":"2000"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S026646230605077X","article-title":"Equity\u2013efficiency trade-offs in health technology assessment","volume":"22","author":"Williams","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1369-6513.2002.00176.x","article-title":"Principles of distributive justice used by members of the general public in the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation: a qualitative study","volume":"5","author":"Wilmot","year":"2002","journal-title":"Health Expect."},{"key":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614_bib49","series-title":"Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data","author":"Wooldridge","year":"2010"}],"container-title":["Social Science & Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S027795362600691X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S027795362600691X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T04:18:32Z","timestamp":1790655512000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S027795362600691X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"references-count":49,"alternative-id":["S027795362600691X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614","relation":{},"ISSN":["0277-9536"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0277-9536","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Are public preferences over health distributions guided by principles of distribution? A social choice experiment","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Social Science & Medicine","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2026.119614","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}],"article-number":"119614"}}