{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T15:02:20Z","timestamp":1778770940236,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":46,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,6,1]],"date-time":"2016-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1464739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","thespinejournalonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,26]],"date-time":"2016-01-26T15:31:28Z","timestamp":1453822288000},"page":"728-736","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":32,"title":["Validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system based on patient-reported improvement after posterior lumbar interbody fusion"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Takahito","family":"Fujimori","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shinya","family":"Okuda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Motoki","family":"Iwasaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ryoji","family":"Yamasaki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takafumi","family":"Maeno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tomoya","family":"Yamashita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tomiya","family":"Matsumoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eiji","family":"Wada","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takenori","family":"Oda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0010","first-page":"4","article-title":"Assessment of treatment for low back pain","volume":"60","author":"Izumida","year":"1985","journal-title":"Nippon Seikeigekakai Zasshi"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2714","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.00186","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients","volume":"88","author":"Okuda","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1007\/s00776-012-0232-x","article-title":"An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a validation study of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score","volume":"17","author":"Azimi","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Orthop Sci"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000136","article-title":"A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD)","volume":"39","author":"Arai","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.4.SPINE12651","article-title":"Outcomes of 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"19","author":"Sakaura","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.8.SPINE13125","article-title":"Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"19","author":"Minamide","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.12.SPINE12629","article-title":"Extraforaminal compression of the L-5 nerve root at the lumbosacral junction: clinical analysis, decompression technique, and outcome","volume":"20","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1601","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000077510.95462.39","article-title":"Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and short-form 36","volume":"28","author":"Fujiwara","year":"2003","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-2114-x","article-title":"Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis","volume":"21","author":"Kotani","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31821f4a51","article-title":"Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty","volume":"37","author":"Sakai","year":"2012","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.01.008","article-title":"Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods","volume":"7","author":"Copay","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.01296","article-title":"Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease","volume":"92","author":"Tashjian","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.01095","article-title":"Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis","volume":"90","author":"Glassman","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1186","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/78.11.1186","article-title":"Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1","volume":"78","author":"Stratford","year":"1998","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"968","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006","article-title":"Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales","volume":"8","author":"Copay","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6","article-title":"Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference","volume":"10","author":"Jaeschke","year":"1989","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10","article-title":"Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change","volume":"33","author":"Ostelo","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1294","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.01136","article-title":"Minimum clinically important differences in the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: results from a national multicenter study of patients treated with anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis","volume":"93","author":"Skolasky","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0100","first-page":"229","article-title":"Minimum clinically important change (MCID) of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score","volume":"21","author":"Manoj","year":"2006","journal-title":"Funct Neurol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2079","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c61fd7","article-title":"The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society-22 Appearance, Activity, And Pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis","volume":"35","author":"Carreon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.02.007","article-title":"Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion","volume":"10","author":"Carreon","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.8.SPINE1194","article-title":"Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease","volume":"16","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.12.SPINE10472","article-title":"Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis","volume":"14","author":"Parker","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.10.SPINE12312","article-title":"Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article","volume":"18","author":"Parker","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47","article-title":"Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain","volume":"31","author":"van der Roer","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"Suppl. 2, pt 2","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200709001-00013","article-title":"Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Surgical technique","volume":"89","author":"Okuda","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198107000-00005","article-title":"Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament","volume":"6","author":"Hirabayashi","year":"1981","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(94)90036-1","article-title":"Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire","volume":"47","author":"Juniper","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000201241.90914.22","article-title":"The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy","volume":"31","author":"Cleland","year":"2006","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20100229","article-title":"Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement","volume":"91","author":"Wang","year":"2011","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.2307\/1422689","article-title":"The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904","volume":"100","author":"Spearman","year":"1987","journal-title":"Am J Psychol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2273011499","article-title":"Correlation and simple linear regression","volume":"227","author":"Zou","year":"2003","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1093\/clinchem\/39.4.561","article-title":"Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine","volume":"39","author":"Zweig","year":"1993","journal-title":"Clin Chem"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0175","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2915","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31815b75ae","article-title":"Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain","volume":"32","author":"Kovacs","year":"2007","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0180","first-page":"406","article-title":"Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods","volume":"28","author":"Wells","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.143.1.7063747","article-title":"The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve","volume":"143","author":"Hanley","year":"1982","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0190","first-page":"1","article-title":"Affecting factors for the assessment of the effectiveness in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire","volume":"2","author":"Nakashima","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Spine Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"869","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(97)00097-8","article-title":"Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach","volume":"50","author":"Norman","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.11.SPINE09526","article-title":"Comparison of patient and surgeon ratings of outcome 12 months after spine surgery: presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting","volume":"12","author":"Porchet","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199606000-00005","article-title":"Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty","volume":"78","author":"Lieberman","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827ae242","article-title":"Comparison of patient and surgeon perceptions of adverse events following adult spinal deformity surgery","volume":"38","author":"Hart","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.04.008","article-title":"Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy","volume":"13","author":"Godil","year":"2013","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2013.01.032","article-title":"Postoperative complications and implications on patient-centered outcomes","volume":"181","author":"Tevis","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e114.1","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.01325","article-title":"Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent","volume":"93","author":"Crepeau","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2073","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.H.01802","article-title":"Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty","volume":"91","author":"Mancuso","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181_bib0235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e30195","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0030195","article-title":"Comparison of patient and surgeon expectations of total hip arthroplasty","volume":"7","author":"Jourdan","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"}],"container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943016002941?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943016002941?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,14]],"date-time":"2020-09-14T11:32:24Z","timestamp":1600083144000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1529943016002941"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"references-count":46,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S1529943016002941"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181","relation":{},"ISSN":["1529-9430"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1529-9430","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system based on patient-reported improvement after posterior lumbar interbody fusion","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Spine Journal","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.01.181","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}