{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,13]],"date-time":"2025-05-13T21:17:13Z","timestamp":1747171033770,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,1]],"date-time":"2016-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1467331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000145","name":"Alberta Innovates Health Solutions","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["201000495-1"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["201000495-1"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000145","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000033","name":"Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000033","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000024","name":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["MFE 113023"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["MFE 113023"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000024","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001804","name":"Canada Research Chairs","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001804","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","thespinejournalonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,28]],"date-time":"2016-03-28T13:16:23Z","timestamp":1459170983000},"page":"884-888","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Luciana Gazzi","family":"Macedo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8396-3790","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna","family":"Bodnar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michele C.","family":"Batti\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1236","DOI":"10.1002\/art.1780380910","article-title":"Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination","volume":"38","author":"Katz","year":"1995","journal-title":"Arthritis Rheum"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.berh.2009.11.001","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"24","author":"Genevay","year":"2010","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1097\/AJP.0b013e31815349bf","article-title":"Spinal canal size and clinical symptoms among persons diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"23","author":"Geisser","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin J Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199505150-00013","article-title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and radiologic features","volume":"20","author":"Amundsen","year":"1995","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2932","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199712150-00016","article-title":"A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis: part I; clinical features related to radiographic findings","volume":"22","author":"Jonsson","year":"1997","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1919","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd","article-title":"Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"35","author":"Schizas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2968","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199712150-00021","article-title":"Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and\/or neurogenic claudication","volume":"22","author":"Willen","year":"1997","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-005-0036-1","article-title":"Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables","volume":"16","author":"Mariconda","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.1100070116","article-title":"Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal\u2014an experimental study in vitro","volume":"7","author":"Schonstrom","year":"1989","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0055","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2607","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200112010-00016","article-title":"The diagnostic effect from axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with degenerative disorders","volume":"26","author":"Willen","year":"2001","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1097\/00002517-199410000-00004","article-title":"Cross-sectional area of the stenotic lumbar dural tube measured from the transverse views of magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"7","author":"Hamanishi","year":"1994","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198804000-00012","article-title":"The significance of oblique cuts on CT scans of the spinal canal in terms of anatomic measurements","volume":"13","author":"Schonstrom","year":"1988","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"Suppl. 6","key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S760","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-1857-8","article-title":"Is spinal stenosis assessment dependent on slice orientation? A magnetic resonance imaging study","volume":"21","author":"Henderson","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/BMR-130440","article-title":"Pathological characteristics of clinical lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"27","author":"Tomkins-Lane","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20110380","article-title":"Quantitative paraspinal muscle measurements: inter-software reliability and agreement using OsiriX and ImageJ","volume":"92","author":"Fortin","year":"2012","journal-title":"Phys Ther"}],"container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S152994301600440X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S152994301600440X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,13]],"date-time":"2018-09-13T20:51:11Z","timestamp":1536871871000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S152994301600440X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S152994301600440X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050","relation":{},"ISSN":["1529-9430"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1529-9430"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Spine Journal","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.02.050","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}