{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,21]],"date-time":"2026-02-21T21:04:51Z","timestamp":1771707891651,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,1]],"date-time":"2017-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1498867200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.fr","thespinejournalonline.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,2,28]],"date-time":"2017-02-28T07:30:33Z","timestamp":1488267033000},"page":"922-932","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Matthew J.","family":"McGirt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Scott L.","family":"Parker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Praveen","family":"Mummaneni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Knightly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Deborah","family":"Pfortmiller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kevin","family":"Foley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anthony L.","family":"Asher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3182055cac","article-title":"Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life","volume":"24","author":"Adogwa","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1247560","article-title":"Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"53","author":"Ntoukas","year":"2010","journal-title":"Minim Invasive Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.04.024","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy","volume":"11","author":"Parker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2011.09.013","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years","volume":"78","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1097\/NCM.0b013e3182529c05","article-title":"Effect of minimally invasive technique on return to work and narcotic use following transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion: a review","volume":"17","author":"Parker","year":"2012","journal-title":"Prof Case Manag"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.041","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis","volume":"82","author":"Parker","year":"2013","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.3.SPINE10562","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis","volume":"15","author":"Adogwa","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181e03099","article-title":"The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at five years after surgery","volume":"37","author":"Glassman","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2108","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318182e390","article-title":"The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)","volume":"33","author":"Tosteson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0055","first-page":"348","article-title":"Challenges in evaluating and standardizing medical devices in health care facilities","volume":"33","author":"Ventola","year":"2008","journal-title":"P T"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0060","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI.2008.9.08142","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up","volume":"9","author":"Dhall","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0065","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1385","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a4e3be","article-title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","volume":"34","author":"Peng","year":"2009","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0070","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1683","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-008-0687-8","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience","volume":"33","author":"Schizas","year":"2009","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0075","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases","volume":"35","author":"Shunwu","year":"2010","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0080","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.041","article-title":"Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis","volume":"82","author":"Parker","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0085","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B3.34178","article-title":"A comparison of patient-reported outcome measures after spinal surgery","volume":"97-B","author":"Patel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0090","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.11.SPINE09526","article-title":"Comparison of patient and surgeon ratings of outcome 12 months after spine surgery: presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting","volume":"12","author":"Porchet","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0095","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E6","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.10.FOCUS12297","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description","volume":"34","author":"McGirt","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00541514","article-title":"The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement","volume":"5","author":"Langley","year":"1985","journal-title":"Rheumatol Int"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2940","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017","article-title":"The Oswestry Disability Index","volume":"25","author":"Fairbank","year":"2000","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/0168-8510(90)90421-9","article-title":"EuroQol\u2014a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life","volume":"16","year":"1990","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0115","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E2","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.10.FOCUS12311","article-title":"The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation","volume":"34","author":"Asher","year":"2013","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1097\/01376517-200802000-00006","article-title":"The multiple benefits of minimally invasive spinal surgery: results comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar fusion","volume":"40","author":"Starkweather","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Neurosci Nurs"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1097\/00002517-200104000-00002","article-title":"Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis","volume":"14","author":"Whitecloud","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.1.SPINE10571","article-title":"Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior\/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients","volume":"14","author":"McGirt","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e318220be32","article-title":"Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients","volume":"25","author":"Wang","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"677","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.SPINE13447","article-title":"Decreased incidence of venous thromboembolism after spine surgery with early multimodal prophylaxis: clinical article","volume":"21","author":"Cox","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.7.SPINE1362","article-title":"The efficacy of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: results from the NeuroPoint-SD registry: clinical article","volume":"19","author":"Ghogawala","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003_bib0150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E3","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.3.FOCUS1450","article-title":"Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry","volume":"36","author":"Mummaneni","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"}],"container-title":["The Spine Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943017300487?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1529943017300487?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,24]],"date-time":"2022-07-24T22:36:37Z","timestamp":1658702197000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1529943017300487"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]}},"alternative-id":["S1529943017300487"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003","relation":{},"ISSN":["1529-9430"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1529-9430","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Spine Journal","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.02.003","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"\u00a9 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}